How popular isManhattan Active Warehouse Management?
In September 2026, people searched for Manhattan Active Warehouse Management by name about 320 times worldwide, about the same as the previous year. These searches made up 0.13% of all global warehouse management software searches, placing Manhattan Active Warehouse Management 11th out of 11 brands. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about warehouse management software, Manhattan Active Warehouse Management appeared in three of the five answers and was the fourth most recommended of the 11.
Manhattan Active Warehouse Management is the 11th most searched of 11 competitors and the fourth most recommended in AI answers.
Blue YonderShare of searches 24.2%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 7th
Zoho InventoryShare of searches 24.2%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
HighJumpShare of searches 19.8%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
Manhattan AssociatesShare of searches 10.8%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 6th- Manhattan Active Warehouse ManagementShare of searches 0.13%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Follow Manhattan Active Warehouse Management and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top warehouse management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Manhattan Active Warehouse Management was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Manhattan Active Warehouse Management is the fourth most recommended of the 11.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Blue Yonder3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Zoho Inventory3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Manhattan Associates3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Cin73 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Fishbowl3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ShipHero2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- HighJump0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Extensiv0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Korber0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about warehouse management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which warehouse management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best warehouse management software tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best warehouse management software for a warehouse team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“warehouse management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“inventory management software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which warehouse management software compete with Manhattan Active Warehouse Management?
Share of searches by month for Blue Yonder, Zoho Inventory, HighJump, Manhattan Associates, Cin7, Extensiv, Korber, ShipHero, Manhattan Active Warehouse Management. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Blue Yonder | Zoho Inventory | HighJump | Manhattan Associates | Cin7 | Extensiv | Korber | ShipHero | Fishbowl | Descartes MacroPoint | Manhattan Active Warehouse Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 25.7% | 25.7% | 21% | 6.3% | 7.8% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 2% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
| Nov 2025 | 22.6% | 27.7% | 22.6% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 3% | 4.5% | 1.7% | 0.27% | 0.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 19.4% | 29% | 23.7% | 8.7% | 6.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 4.7% | 1.5% | 0.23% | 0.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 20.5% | 25.1% | 25.1% | 9.2% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 1.6% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| Feb 2026 | 21% | 25.6% | 25.6% | 9.4% | 6.4% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 1.6% | 0.31% | 0.35% |
| Mar 2026 | 23% | 23% | 28.1% | 6.9% | 7% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 1.5% | 0.27% | 0.4% |
| Apr 2026 | 21.2% | 26% | 26% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.6% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| May 2026 | 21.5% | 26.3% | 26.3% | 6.4% | 6.8% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.4% | 0.26% | 0.31% |
| Jun 2026 | 22.2% | 27.2% | 22.2% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 3% | 3.6% | 1.4% | 0.26% | 0.12% |
| Jul 2026 | 22.4% | 27.4% | 18.3% | 12.2% | 8.3% | 3% | 3% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 0.27% | 0.14% |
| Aug 2026 | 22.9% | 22.9% | 22.9% | 12.5% | 7.2% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Sep 2026 | 24.2% | 24.2% | 19.8% | 10.8% | 7.6% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 1.2% | 0.29% | 0.13% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 24.2% | 60.5K | 0% | +1.3 points | |
| 2, moved from 3rd to 2nd | 24.2% | 60.5K | 0% | +1.3 pointsmoved from 3rd to 2nd | |
| 3, moved from 2nd to 3rd | 19.8% | 49.5K | -18.2% | -3.1 pointsmoved from 2nd to 3rd | |
| 4, held 4th | 10.8% | 27.1K | -18.1% | -1.7 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 7.6% | 19K | 0% | +0.4 points | |
| 6, moved from 7th to 6th | 4% | 9.9K | +22.2% | +0.9 pointsmoved from 7th to 6th | |
| 7, moved from 8th to 7th | 4% | 9.9K | +22.2% | +0.9 pointsmoved from 8th to 7th | |
| 8, moved from 6th to 8th | 4% | 9.9K | 0% | +0.2 pointsmoved from 6th to 8th | |
| 9, held 9th | 1.2% | 3.1K | -17.6% | -0.2 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.29% | 720 | -18.2% | 0 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.13% | 320 | -17.9% | 0 points |
24.2%
Held 1st. 60.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +1.3 points.
24.2%
Moved from 3rd to 2nd. 60.5K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +1.3 points.
3.
HighJump19.8%
Moved from 2nd to 3rd. 49.5K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -3.1 points.
10.8%
Held 4th. 27.1K estimated branded searches, -18.1% vs prior month. Share -1.7 points.
5.
Cin77.6%
Held 5th. 19K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
6.
Extensiv4%
Moved from 7th to 6th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
7.
Korber4%
Moved from 8th to 7th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, +22.2% vs prior month. Share +0.9 points.
8.
ShipHero4%
Moved from 6th to 8th. 9.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
9.
Fishbowl1.2%
Held 9th. 3.1K estimated branded searches, -17.6% vs prior month. Share -0.2 points.
0.29%
Held 10th. 720 estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Held 11th. 320 estimated branded searches, -17.9% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Manhattan Active Warehouse Management and its closest rivals
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs Extensiv: compare popularity
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs Korber: compare popularity
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs ShipHero: compare popularity
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs Fishbowl: compare popularity
Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs Descartes MacroPoint: compare popularity- Compare Manhattan Active Warehouse Management with any brand
Every comparison with Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
10 comparisons
- Blue Yonder vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- Cin7 vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- Extensiv vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- Fishbowl vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- HighJump vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- Korber vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs Manhattan Associates
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs ShipHero
- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management vs Zoho Inventory
How has branded search demand for Manhattan Active Warehouse Management changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Manhattan Active Warehouse Management worldwide held steady at 320.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Manhattan Active Warehouse Management’s share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide held steady, from 0.11% to 0.13%.
How did search popularity change for warehouse management software worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes
In September 2026, Zoho Inventory overtook HighJump to rank 2nd among warehouse management software worldwide, with 24.2% of the searches.
In September 2026, Extensiv overtook ShipHero to rank 6th among warehouse management software worldwide, with 4% of the searches.
In September 2026, Korber overtook ShipHero to rank 7th among warehouse management software worldwide, with 4% of the searches.
In September 2026, Blue Yonder gained share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide, from 22.9% to 24.2%.
In September 2026, HighJump lost share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide, from 22.9% to 19.8%.
In September 2026, Manhattan Associates lost share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide, from 12.5% to 10.8%.
How are Manhattan Active Warehouse Management’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Manhattan Active Warehouse Management’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- manhattan active warehouse management
Do you work for Manhattan Active Warehouse Management? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.
Is Manhattan Active Warehouse Management your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.