How popular isLunary?
In September 2026, people searched for Lunary by name about 3,600 times worldwide, an 18.2% decrease from the previous year. These searches made up 1.4% of all global LLM observability platform searches, placing Lunary sixth out of eight platforms. When we asked both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about LLM observability platforms, Lunary appeared in two of the five answers and was the seventh most recommended of the eight.
Lunary is the sixth most searched of 8 competitors and the seventh most recommended in AI answers.
LangfuseShare of searches 42.3%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
LangSmithShare of searches 28.4%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 2nd
Weights & BiasesShare of searches 19.7%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 8th
Arize PhoenixShare of searches 5.1%Mentioned in 5 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 3rd
LunaryShare of searches 1.4%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 7th
Follow Lunary and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top LLM observability platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Lunary was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Lunary is the seventh most recommended of the eight.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Langfuse1st
LangSmith2nd
Arize Phoenix3rd
Braintrust4th
Datadog LLM Observability5th
Helicone6th
Lunary7th
Weights & Biases8th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Langfuse5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
LangSmith5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Arize Phoenix5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Datadog LLM Observability5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Braintrust3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Helicone2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Lunary2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Weights & Biases1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about LLM observability platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which LLM observability platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best LLM observability platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best LLM observability platform for a machine learning team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“llm observability platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“llm monitoring tools”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Which LLM observability platforms compete with Lunary?
Share of searches by month for Langfuse, LangSmith, Weights & Biases, Arize Phoenix, Lunary. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Langfuse | LangSmith | Weights & Biases | Arize Phoenix | Helicone | Lunary | Braintrust | Datadog LLM Observability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 29.3% | 29.3% | 31.5% | 4.4% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 0.63% | 0.95% |
| Nov 2025 | 29.4% | 29.4% | 31.8% | 4.4% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 0.64% | 0.76% |
| Dec 2025 | 29.8% | 29.8% | 30.7% | 4% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
| Jan 2026 | 33.3% | 27.2% | 28% | 4.8% | 3% | 2% | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| Feb 2026 | 34.9% | 28.5% | 25.1% | 5.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 0.93% | 0.93% |
| Mar 2026 | 34.9% | 28.7% | 25.2% | 5.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.92% |
| Apr 2026 | 33.6% | 27.6% | 28.4% | 4.9% | 3% | 1.1% | 0.73% | 0.58% |
| May 2026 | 35.7% | 29.4% | 24.7% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 1.2% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
| Jun 2026 | 37.1% | 30.5% | 21.9% | 5.5% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| Jul 2026 | 39.3% | 32.4% | 19.1% | 4.7% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 0.46% |
| Aug 2026 | 41.2% | 27.7% | 19.2% | 7% | 2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.37% |
| Sep 2026 | 42.3% | 28.4% | 19.7% | 5.1% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.34% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 42.3% | 110K | 0% | +1 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 28.4% | 74K | 0% | +0.7 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 19.7% | 51.3K | +0.31% | +0.5 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 5.1% | 13.2K | -29.4% | -1.9 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 1.7% | 4.4K | -18.5% | -0.3 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 1.4% | 3.6K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.1% | 2.9K | 0% | 0 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 0.34% | 880 | -12% | 0 points |
1.
Langfuse42.3%
Held 1st. 110K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +1 points.
28.4%
Held 2nd. 74K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.7 points.
19.7%
Held 3rd. 51.3K estimated branded searches, +0.31% vs prior month. Share +0.5 points.
5.1%
Held 4th. 13.2K estimated branded searches, -29.4% vs prior month. Share -1.9 points.
5.
Helicone1.7%
Held 5th. 4.4K estimated branded searches, -18.5% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
6.
Lunary1.4%
Held 6th. 3.6K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
1.1%
Held 7th. 2.9K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
0.34%
Held 8th. 880 estimated branded searches, -12% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Compare popularity between Lunary and its closest rivals
Every comparison with Lunary
7 comparisons
How has branded search demand for Lunary changed worldwide over the last 12 months?
2 findings
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, estimated monthly branded searches for Lunary worldwide fell from 4.4K to 3.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Lunary’s share of searches among LLM observability platforms worldwide held steady, from 1.7% to 1.4%.
How did search popularity change for LLM observability platforms worldwide in September 2026?
6 changes

In September 2026, Langfuse gained share of searches among LLM observability platforms worldwide, from 41.2% to 42.3%.

In September 2026, LangSmith gained share of searches among LLM observability platforms worldwide, from 27.7% to 28.4%.

In September 2026, Weights & Biases gained share of searches among LLM observability platforms worldwide, from 19.2% to 19.7%.

In September 2026, Arize Phoenix lost share of searches among LLM observability platforms worldwide, from 7% to 5.1%.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Braintrust worldwide rose 81.3% over 12 measured months, from 1.6K to 2.9K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Datadog LLM Observability worldwide fell 63.3% over 12 measured months, from 2.4K to 880 in September 2026.
How are Lunary’s branded searches counted?
1 search term
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Lunary’s name. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for this branded term can be used to understand whether interest in the brand is growing, holding steady, or fading.
- lunary
Do you work for Lunary? To request corrections or removal please contact us via our support page and we will be happy to assist.

Is Lunary your brand?
Put your own campaigns, spend and outcomes next to this demand line, so you can see which of your marketing lined up with the movements above.