Brandwave

Pandora vs Tiffany & Co.:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Tiffany & Co. had more branded searches than Pandora among jewellery brands in Australia. Tiffany & Co. had about 74,000 branded searches, while Pandora had 37,000. Tiffany & Co. made up 17% of all jewellery brand searches we track, and Pandora accounted for 8.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about jewellery brands, Tiffany & Co. appeared in three of the five answers and Pandora in one. Pandora and Tiffany & Co. were each mentioned first in one of the two answers that named either.

Among jewellery brands in Australia in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Tiffany & Co., about 2 searches for every 1 for Pandora

Tiffany & Co. 74K searchesPandora 37K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Tiffany & Co., mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Pandora in 1

Tiffany & Co. in 3 of 5Pandora in 1 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Each is named first in 1 of 2 answers.

Pandora first in 1Tiffany & Co. first in 1

Follow Pandora vs Tiffany & Co. and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top jewellery brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Tiffany & Co. was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Pandora was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Pandora and Tiffany & Co. were each listed first in one of the two answers that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. By Charlotte1st
  2. Temple of the Sun2nd
  3. Sarah & Sebastian3rd
  4. Mejuri4th
  5. Cushla Whiting5th
  6. Swarovski6th
  7. Pandora7th
  8. Arms of Eve8th
  9. Tiffany & Co.9th
  10. Natasha Schweitzer–
  11. +2 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Tiffany & Co.3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • By Charlotte3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Temple of the Sun3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Swarovski2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Arms of Eve2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Sarah & Sebastian2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Mejuri2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Cushla Whiting2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Pandora1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Natasha Schweitzer0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+2 more

See every answer about jewellery brands

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.

Is Pandora or Tiffany & Co. more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Pandora and Tiffany & Co. by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 jewellery brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.

Pandora and Tiffany & Co. among jewellery brands in Australia, by month

Share of searches by month for Tiffany & Co., Pandora. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSwarovskiTiffany & Co.By CharlotteArms of EveSarah & SebastianPandoraMejuriNatasha SchweitzerTemple of the SunLucy FolkThomas SaboCushla Whiting
Oct 202533.6%15.1%12.3%8.3%10.1%8.8%4.5%1.7%2%2%1.3%0.33%
Nov 202533%12.1%14.7%12.1%8.1%8.6%5.4%1.3%1.6%1.3%1.3%0.25%
Dec 202537.6%13.7%11.3%9.2%9.2%9.4%3.4%1.2%1.8%1.5%1.2%0.2%
Jan 202633.8%15.2%12.4%8.3%12.4%7.2%3.7%1.7%2%1.7%1.4%0.33%
Feb 202636.3%16.3%10.9%7.3%10.9%7.7%4%1.5%1.8%1.8%1.2%0.35%
Mar 202630.9%17%13.9%9.3%11.3%6.6%4.1%1.9%1.9%1.5%1.2%0.37%
Apr 202630.4%16.7%13.6%9.1%11.1%7.6%5%1.8%1.8%1.5%0.99%0.36%
May 202635.1%15.7%12.9%7%10.5%7.9%4.7%1.7%1.7%1.4%0.94%0.34%
Jun 202635.6%16%13.1%8.7%8.7%7.6%3.9%1.4%2.1%1.4%0.95%0.35%
Jul 202632.4%17.7%11.9%7.9%9.7%8.4%5.3%1.9%1.9%1.1%1.3%0.38%
Aug 202629.6%16.2%13.2%8.9%10.8%9%5.9%1.8%1.8%1.2%1.2%0.42%
Sep 202631.1%17%13.9%9.3%9.3%8.5%4.2%1.9%1.9%1.2%1.2%0.37%

How has the Pandora and Tiffany & Co. comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Tiffany & Co. was ahead of Pandora in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pandora’s share of searches among jewellery brands in Australia moved from 8.8% to 8.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 43K to 37K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Tiffany & Co.’s share of searches among jewellery brands in Australia moved from 15.1% to 17%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 74K.

How did search popularity change for Australia jewellery brands in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Tiffany & Co. gained share of searches among jewellery brands in Australia, from 16.2% to 17%.

  2. In September 2026, Pandora fell from 5th to 6th among jewellery brands in Australia.

How are branded searches counted?

3 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Pandora’s and Tiffany & Co.’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Pandora

2 branded search terms

  • pandora bracelet
  • pandora jewellery

Tiffany & Co.

1 branded search term

  • tiffany and co

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among jewellery brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.