Carhartt WIP vs Thrills:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Carhartt WIP and Thrills were level in searches among streetwear brands in Australia, with an estimated 3.6K branded searches each, at 3.2% of the total each. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about streetwear brands, Carhartt WIP appeared in four of the five answers and Thrills in one. Carhartt WIP was mentioned before Thrills in four out of five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Carhartt WIP and Thrills are searched for about as often as each other.
Who does AI mention more?
Carhartt WIP, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Thrills in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Carhartt WIP, named ahead of Thrills in 4 of 5 answers
Follow Carhartt WIP vs Thrills and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top streetwear brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Carhartt WIP was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Thrills was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Carhartt WIP was listed before Thrills in four out of five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Stüssy1st
Carhartt WIP2nd
Ksubi3rd
Represent4th
Butter Goods5th
Kith6th
Corteiz7th
Thrills7th
Fear of God Essentials9th
I Love Ugly–- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Carhartt WIP4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Stüssy3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Ksubi3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Kith2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Represent2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Butter Goods1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Corteiz1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Fear of God Essentials1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Thrills1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
I Love Ugly0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about streetwear brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which streetwear brand should I buy in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best streetwear brands?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which streetwear brand makes the best hoodies?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“streetwear”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“streetwear brands”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.
Is Carhartt WIP or Thrills more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Carhartt WIP and Thrills by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 streetwear brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Carhartt WIP, Thrills. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Stüssy | I Love Ugly | Ksubi | Butter Goods | Corteiz | Kith | Carhartt WIP | Fear of God Essentials | Thrills | Represent | Huffer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 39.6% | 11.8% | 11.8% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.3% |
| Nov 2025 | 33% | 22% | 9.9% | 8.1% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 4.4% | 1.3% |
| Dec 2025 | 34.5% | 12.6% | 12.6% | 8.4% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 3.7% | 1.4% |
| Jan 2026 | 36.7% | 11% | 13.4% | 6% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 1.4% |
| Feb 2026 | 39.5% | 11.8% | 11.8% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.5% | 14.4% | 11.8% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 1.3% |
| Apr 2026 | 41.9% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 6.9% | 6.9% | 5.6% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.4% |
| May 2026 | 34.9% | 12.8% | 12.8% | 8.5% | 7% | 8.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Jun 2026 | 31.6% | 14.1% | 11.5% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 2.8% | 5.2% | 2.8% |
| Jul 2026 | 33.5% | 15% | 12.2% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.5% | 4.5% | 2.4% | 4.5% | 1.9% |
| Aug 2026 | 40.8% | 18.3% | 10% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Sep 2026 | 44.2% | 13.2% | 10.8% | 7.2% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 0.89% |
How has the Carhartt WIP and Thrills comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Carhartt WIP was ahead of Thrills in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Carhartt WIP’s share of searches among streetwear brands in Australia moved from 5.3% to 3.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 5.4K to 3.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Thrills’ share of searches among streetwear brands in Australia moved from 2.8% to 3.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.9K to 3.6K.
How did search popularity change for Australia streetwear brands in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Thrills overtook Represent to rank 9th among streetwear brands in Australia, with 3.2% of the searches.

Carhartt WIP’s share of searches among streetwear brands in Australia has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 5.2% to 3.2% in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Carhartt WIP’s and Thrills’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Carhartt WIP
1 branded search term
- carhartt wip
Thrills
1 branded search term
- thrills clothing
Other head-to-heads among streetwear brands

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.