Brandwave

Bonds vs TOM Organic:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Bonds had more branded searches than TOM Organic among period care brands in Australia. Bonds had about 3,600 branded searches, while TOM Organic had 2,400. Bonds made up 6% of all period care brand searches we track, and TOM Organic accounted for 4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about period care brands, TOM Organic appeared in three of the five answers and Bonds in two. TOM Organic was mentioned before Bonds in three out of five answers.

Among period care brands in Australia in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Bonds, about 50% more searches than TOM Organic

Bonds 3.6K searchesTOM Organic 2.4K searches

Who does AI mention more?

TOM Organic, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Bonds in 2

TOM Organic in 3 of 5Bonds in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

TOM Organic, named ahead of Bonds in 3 of 5 answers

TOM Organic first in 3Bonds first in 2

Follow Bonds vs TOM Organic and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top period care brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, TOM Organic was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Bonds was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. TOM Organic was listed before Bonds in three out of five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Modibodi1st
  2. TOM Organic1st
  3. U by Kotex3rd
  4. Libra4th
  5. Bonds5th
  6. Tsuno6th
  7. Carefree7th
  8. Cottons7th
  9. Always9th
  10. Stayfree–
  11. +2 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Modibodi3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • TOM Organic3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Libra2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • U by Kotex2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Bonds2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Carefree1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Always1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Cottons1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Tsuno1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Stayfree0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+2 more

See every answer about period care brands

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.

Is Bonds or TOM Organic more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Bonds and TOM Organic by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 period care brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.

Bonds and TOM Organic among period care brands in Australia, by month

Share of searches by month for Bonds, TOM Organic. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthModibodiLibraU by KotexBondsStayfreeTOM OrganicMoxieCarefreeAlwaysCottonsTsunoThinx
Oct 202544.4%24.2%8%7.2%3.9%3.1%0.79%1.2%5.9%0.52%0.34%0.43%
Nov 202558.8%17.6%7.1%6.4%2.8%2.3%0.7%0.86%2.3%0.46%0.25%0.38%
Dec 202550.9%22.7%8.6%6.8%3.6%2.4%0.9%1.1%1.7%0.6%0.21%0.49%
Jan 202653.8%19.7%8%7.1%3.9%2.6%0.96%1.2%1.4%0.63%0.28%0.52%
Feb 202645.7%24.9%9.5%7.4%3.3%3.3%0.99%1.2%2.1%0.8%0.35%0.43%
Mar 202637.1%30.3%10%7.4%4.9%3.3%1.2%1.5%2.7%0.8%0.35%0.43%
Apr 202638.4%25.6%12.7%7.6%5.1%3.4%1.3%1.5%2.8%0.83%0.36%0.45%
May 202634.2%28%13.8%8.3%5.5%3.6%1.4%1.4%2.5%0.74%0.4%0.4%
Jun 202638.3%25.5%12.6%7.6%6.2%3.3%1.2%1.5%2.2%0.83%0.29%0.36%
Jul 202629.3%35.9%12.6%7.1%5.8%3.1%1.4%1.4%2.1%0.78%0.27%0.27%
Aug 202636.3%29.6%11.1%7.2%5.9%3.9%1.6%1.2%1.6%0.96%0.23%0.34%
Sep 202636.7%29.9%11.2%6%6%4%2.2%1.5%1.2%0.79%0.35%0.28%

How has the Bonds and TOM Organic comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Bonds was ahead of TOM Organic in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Bonds’ share of searches among period care brands in Australia moved from 7.2% to 6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 3.6K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TOM Organic’s share of searches among period care brands in Australia moved from 3.1% to 4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.9K to 2.4K.

How did search popularity change for Australia period care brands in September 2026?

2 changes

  1. In September 2026, Bonds lost share of searches among period care brands in Australia, from 7.2% to 6%.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for TOM Organic in Australia rose 26.3% over 12 measured months, from 1.9K to 2.4K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Bonds’ and TOM Organic’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Bonds

1 branded search term

  • bonds period undies

TOM Organic

1 branded search term

  • tom organic

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among period care brands

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free