Food storage brands in Australia:Which are most popular?
In September 2026, Sistema was the most searched food storage brand in Australia, accounting for 35.7% of all searches among the 11 brands we track. When we checked with ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews, Sistema and Pyrex were mentioned most often, in three of the five answers. Sistema was recommended most often, coming first in two out of four responses that gave a list.
SistemaShare of searches 35.7%Mentioned in 3 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 1st
TupperwareShare of searches 29.2%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
DécorShare of searches 19.5%Mentioned in 1 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 7th
SmashShare of searches 5.8%Mentioned in 0 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations –
OXOShare of searches 2.4%Mentioned in 2 of 5 AI answersPlace in AI recommendations 4th
Follow food storage brands and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top food storage brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In Brandwave's three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Sistema and Pyrex were mentioned most often, in three of the five answers. Sistema was recommended most often, coming first in two out of four answers that gave a list. Glasslock was second, and Pyrex was third. Tupperware, which ranked second in searches, was not mentioned at all.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Sistema1st- Glasslock2nd
Pyrex3rd
OXO4th
Lock&Lock5th
MontiiCo6th
Décor7th
Tupperware–
Smash–
Rubbermaid–
ClickClack–
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Sistema3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Pyrex3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
OXO2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Glasslock2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Lock&Lock2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Décor1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
MontiiCo1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Tupperware0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Smash0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Rubbermaid0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ClickClack0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about food storage brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best food storage containers in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which lunch box brand is best for kids?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best glass meal prep containers?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“food storage containers”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“lunch box”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.
Which food storage brands do people search for most?
This chart shows how often people search Google for each food storage brand by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 food storage brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Sistema, Tupperware, Décor, Smash, OXO, Pyrex. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Sistema | Tupperware | Décor | Smash | OXO | Pyrex | MontiiCo | Glasslock | Lock&Lock | Rubbermaid | ClickClack |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 32% | 32% | 17.4% | 6.3% | 3.4% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.69% | 0.55% |
| Nov 2025 | 30% | 30% | 16.3% | 8.9% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 4.7% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.64% | 0.52% |
| Dec 2025 | 28.9% | 35.3% | 15.7% | 6.9% | 3.8% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.76% | 0.26% |
| Jan 2026 | 23.2% | 34.7% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 10.4% | 1.1% | 0.76% | 0.41% | 0.27% |
| Feb 2026 | 30.7% | 30.7% | 16.7% | 9.1% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.53% | 0.43% |
| Mar 2026 | 34.2% | 28% | 18.6% | 6.8% | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.7% | 2% | 0.9% | 0.48% |
| Apr 2026 | 32.6% | 32.6% | 17.8% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 2.7% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 0.46% |
| May 2026 | 35.1% | 28.7% | 19.2% | 5.7% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.76% | 0.4% |
| Jun 2026 | 33% | 33% | 18.1% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.71% | 0.38% |
| Jul 2026 | 32.7% | 32.7% | 17.9% | 6.4% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.57% | 0.31% |
| Aug 2026 | 36.2% | 29.6% | 19.8% | 5.8% | 2% | 2% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.34% |
| Sep 2026 | 35.7% | 29.2% | 19.5% | 5.8% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.63% | 0.34% |
| Rank | Brand | Share of searches | Estimated monthly branded searches | vs prior month | Share change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, held 1st | 35.7% | 14.8K | -18.2% | -0.5 points | |
| 2, held 2nd | 29.2% | 12.1K | -18.2% | -0.4 points | |
| 3, held 3rd | 19.5% | 8.1K | -18.2% | -0.3 points | |
| 4, held 4th | 5.8% | 2.4K | -17.2% | 0 points | |
| 5, held 5th | 2.4% | 1K | 0% | +0.4 points | |
| 6, held 6th | 2.4% | 1K | 0% | +0.4 points | |
| 7, held 7th | 1.7% | 720 | 0% | +0.3 points | |
| 8, held 8th | 1.2% | 480 | -18.6% | 0 points | |
| 9, held 9th | 1.2% | 480 | 0% | +0.2 points | |
| 10, held 10th | 0.63% | 260 | -18.8% | 0 points | |
| 11, held 11th | 0.34% | 140 | -17.6% | 0 points |
1.
Sistema35.7%
Held 1st. 14.8K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.5 points.
29.2%
Held 2nd. 12.1K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.4 points.
3.
Décor19.5%
Held 3rd. 8.1K estimated branded searches, -18.2% vs prior month. Share -0.3 points.
4.
Smash5.8%
Held 4th. 2.4K estimated branded searches, -17.2% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
5.
OXO2.4%
Held 5th. 1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
6.
Pyrex2.4%
Held 6th. 1K estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.4 points.
7.
MontiiCo1.7%
Held 7th. 720 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.3 points.
1.2%
Held 8th. 480 estimated branded searches, -18.6% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
1.2%
Held 9th. 480 estimated branded searches, 0% vs prior month. Share +0.2 points.
10.
Rubbermaid0.63%
Held 10th. 260 estimated branded searches, -18.8% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
11.
ClickClack0.34%
Held 11th. 140 estimated branded searches, -17.6% vs prior month. Share 0 points.
Which brand is most popular in search among food storage brands in Australia?
11 brands
In September 2026, Sistema was the most searched among food storage brands in Australia, with an estimated 14.8K branded searches, 35.7% of all searches for the 11 we track. Tupperware is in 2nd place, 6.5 percentage points behind at 29.2%.
| Brand | Share of searches | Peak | Low | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32% → 35.7% | 36.2%Aug 2026 | 23.2%Jan 2026 | 1st | |
| 32% → 29.2% | 35.3%Dec 2025 | 28%Mar 2026 | 2nd | |
| 17.4% → 19.5% | 19.8%Aug 2026 | 12.7%Jan 2026 | 3rd | |
| 6.3% → 5.8% | 12.7%Jan 2026 | 5.1%Apr 2026 | 4th | |
| 3.4% → 2.4% | 3.8%Dec 2025 | 2%Aug 2026 | 5th | |
| 2.6% → 2.4% | 3.1%May 2026 | 1.7%Jan 2026 | 6th | |
| 1.9% → 1.7% | 10.4%Jan 2026 | 1.3%Apr 2026 | 7th | |
| Glasslock | 1.6% → 1.2% | 1.9%Apr 2026 | 1.1%Jan 2026 | 8th |
| 1.6% → 1.2% | 2%Mar 2026 | 0.76%Jan 2026 | 9th | |
| 0.69% → 0.63% | 0.9%Mar 2026 | 0.41%Jan 2026 | 10th | |
| 0.55% → 0.34% | 0.55%Oct 2025 | 0.26%Dec 2025 | 11th |
Each finding as a sentence
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Sistema’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia increased from 32% to 35.7%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Tupperware’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia decreased from 32% to 29.2%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Décor’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia increased from 17.4% to 19.5%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Smash’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia decreased from 6.3% to 5.8%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OXO’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia decreased from 3.4% to 2.4%.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Sistema’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 36.2% in August 2026 and was lowest at 23.2% in January 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Tupperware’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 35.3% in December 2025 and was lowest at 28% in March 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Décor’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 19.8% in August 2026 and was lowest at 12.7% in January 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Smash’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 12.7% in January 2026 and was lowest at 5.1% in April 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OXO’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 3.8% in December 2025 and was lowest at 2% in August 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pyrex’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 3.1% in May 2026 and was lowest at 1.7% in January 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, MontiiCo’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 10.4% in January 2026 and was lowest at 1.3% in April 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Lock&Lock’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia peaked at 2% in March 2026 and was lowest at 0.76% in January 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pyrex, MontiiCo, Glasslock, Lock&Lock, Rubbermaid and ClickClack held steady: their share of searches among food storage brands in Australia each moved less than 0.5 percentage points.
How did search popularity change for Australia food storage brands in September 2026?
7 changes

In September 2026, Sistema lost share of searches among food storage brands in Australia, from 36.2% to 35.7%.

Tupperware’s share of searches among food storage brands in Australia has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 33% to 29.2% in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Décor in Australia rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 6.6K to 8.1K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for ClickClack in Australia fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 210 to 140 in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for OXO in Australia fell 23.1% over 12 measured months, from 1.3K to 1K in September 2026.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Glasslock in Australia fell 18.6% over 12 measured months, from 590 to 480 in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Lock&Lock in Australia fell 18.6% over 12 measured months, from 590 to 480 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted for food storage brands?
11 search terms
Each brand's share of searches among food storage brands comes from the terms listed under its name. When people mostly search for a brand because of something else it sells, only the searches that name this product count here.
Sistema
1 branded search term
- sistema containers
Tupperware
1 branded search term
- tupperware
Décor
1 branded search term
- decor containers
Smash
1 branded search term
- smash lunch box
OXO
1 branded search term
- oxo containers
Pyrex
1 branded search term
- pyrex containers
MontiiCo
1 branded search term
- montiico lunch box
Glasslock
1 branded search term
- glasslock
Lock&Lock
1 branded search term
- lock and lock
Rubbermaid
1 branded search term
- rubbermaid containers
ClickClack
1 branded search term
- click clack containers
Compare popularity between leading brands

Sistema vs Tupperware: compare popularity
Sistema vs Décor: compare popularity
Sistema vs Smash: compare popularity
Sistema vs OXO: compare popularity
Tupperware vs Décor: compare popularity
Tupperware vs Smash: compare popularity
Tupperware vs OXO: compare popularity
Décor vs Smash: compare popularity
Décor vs OXO: compare popularity
Smash vs OXO: compare popularity- Compare any of these brands

See your own brand in this picture
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to your campaigns, spend and outcomes, so you can see what moved your numbers, not just that they moved.