HiPP vs SMA:Which is more popular in the United Kingdom?
In September 2026, SMA had more branded searches than HiPP among baby formula brands in the United Kingdom. SMA had about 4,800 branded searches, while HiPP had 1,300. SMA made up 4.9% of all baby formula brand searches we track, and HiPP accounted for 1.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about baby formula brands, SMA appeared in two of the three answers and HiPP in none.
Follow HiPP vs SMA and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top baby formula brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions, SMA was mentioned in two out of three: in two of the three ChatGPT answers. HiPP did not appear in any of the three answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Aptamil3 of 3Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Kendamil2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
SMA2 of 3Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answers
Cow & Gate1 of 3Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answers
HiPP0 of 3Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answers
See every answer about baby formula brands
3 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best first infant milk in the UK?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which baby formula is best for colic?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Is expensive baby formula better than supermarket formula?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“baby formula”
Google showed no AI Overview for this search.
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in United Kingdom on October 27, 2026.
Is HiPP or SMA more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for HiPP and SMA by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all five baby formula brands we track, month by month, from searches in United Kingdom.
Share of searches by month for SMA, HiPP. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Kendamil | Aptamil | Cow & Gate | SMA | HiPP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.6% | 29.4% | 16.7% | 7.7% | 1.5% |
| Nov 2025 | 44.8% | 29.5% | 16.8% | 7.8% | 1.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 46.7% | 28.8% | 16.4% | 7% | 1.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 37.2% | 28% | 16% | 17.9% | 0.95% |
| Feb 2026 | 44.5% | 24.2% | 25.8% | 4% | 1.6% |
| Mar 2026 | 53.2% | 24.1% | 17.3% | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| Apr 2026 | 61.4% | 20.5% | 12.9% | 3.6% | 1.6% |
| May 2026 | 58.2% | 23.9% | 12.3% | 4.2% | 1.5% |
| Jun 2026 | 57.6% | 23.6% | 13.5% | 4.2% | 1.1% |
| Jul 2026 | 56.9% | 24.9% | 11.6% | 5.3% | 1.2% |
| Aug 2026 | 55.7% | 23.6% | 14.4% | 5.2% | 1.1% |
| Sep 2026 | 57% | 23.2% | 13.6% | 4.9% | 1.3% |
How has branded search for HiPP and SMA changed in the United Kingdom over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- SMA was ahead of HiPP in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, HiPP’s share of searches among baby formula brands in the United Kingdom moved from 1.5% to 1.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.3K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, SMA’s share of searches among baby formula brands in the United Kingdom moved from 7.7% to 4.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 6.8K to 4.8K.
How did search popularity change for United Kingdom baby formula brands in September 2026?
1 change
Estimated monthly branded searches for SMA in the United Kingdom fell 29.4% over 12 measured months, from 6.8K to 4.8K in September 2026.
How are HiPP’s and SMA’s branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using HiPP’s and SMA’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among baby formula brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.