Brandwave

Socket vs Sonatype:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Sonatype had more branded searches than Socket among dependency scanning tools worldwide. Sonatype had about 9,900 branded searches, while Socket had 2,900. Sonatype made up 6.8% of all dependency scanning tool searches we track, and Socket accounted for 2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about dependency scanning tools, Socket and Sonatype each appeared in two of the five answers. Socket was mentioned before Sonatype in two out of three answers that named either.

Among dependency scanning tools worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Sonatype, about 3 searches for every 1 for Socket

Sonatype 9.9K searchesSocket 2.9K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.

Socket in 2 of 5Sonatype in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Socket, named ahead of Sonatype in 2 of 3 answers

Socket first in 2Sonatype first in 1

Follow Socket vs Sonatype and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top dependency scanning tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Socket was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Sonatype was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Socket was listed before Sonatype in two out of three answers that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Trivy1st
  2. Dependabot2nd
  3. Snyk3rd
  4. OWASP Dependency-Check4th
  5. Socket5th
  6. Sonatype6th
  7. Renovate7th
  8. Mend8th
  9. Black Duck9th
  10. OWASP Dependency-Track10th
  11. +1 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Trivy4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Dependabot4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Snyk3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • OWASP Dependency-Check3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Sonatype2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Renovate2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Socket2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Black Duck2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Mend2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • OWASP Dependency-Track1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

+1 more

See every answer about dependency scanning tools

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.

Is Socket or Sonatype more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Socket and Sonatype by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 dependency scanning tools we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Socket and Sonatype among dependency scanning tools worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Sonatype, Socket. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSnykTrivyDependabotOWASP Dependency-TrackSonatypeRenovateOWASP Dependency-CheckSocketBlack DuckMendFOSSA
Oct 202543.6%19.5%13%5.8%7.1%3.2%4.8%1.2%1.1%0.72%<0.01%
Nov 202540.2%22%12%6.6%8%3.6%4.4%1.3%0.98%0.81%<0.01%
Dec 202539.8%21.8%14.5%6.5%6.5%3.5%4.3%1.2%1.1%0.8%<0.01%
Jan 202639.2%21.5%14.3%6.4%7.8%3.5%4.3%1.1%1%0.79%<0.01%
Feb 202644%19.7%13.2%5.9%7.2%3.9%3.2%1.2%0.95%0.73%<0.01%
Mar 202626.3%47.7%9.6%4.3%4.3%2.9%2.3%1.4%0.76%0.43%<0.01%
Apr 202635.6%29.2%13.1%5.8%5.8%3.2%3.2%2.4%0.94%0.77%<0.01%
May 202639%21.3%14.3%6.4%6.4%3.5%2.8%4.6%0.93%0.64%<0.01%
Jun 202639.8%21.8%14.6%6.5%6.5%3.6%3.6%2.1%0.95%0.58%<0.01%
Jul 202635.4%23.7%15.9%7.1%7.1%3.9%3.1%1.9%1.3%0.72%<0.01%
Aug 202633.8%27.6%15.1%5.5%6.8%3.7%2.5%3.3%0.98%0.68%<0.01%
Sep 202633.9%27.7%15.2%6.8%6.8%3.7%2.5%2%0.98%0.6%<0.01%

How has the Socket and Sonatype comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Sonatype was ahead of Socket in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Socket’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide moved from 1.2% to 2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.6K to 2.9K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Sonatype’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide moved from 7.1% to 6.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 9.9K.

How did search popularity change for dependency scanning tools worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track overtook Sonatype to rank 4th among dependency scanning tools worldwide, with 6.8% of the searches.

  2. In September 2026, Socket lost share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide, from 3.3% to 2%.

How are branded searches counted?

3 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Socket’s and Sonatype’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Socket

2 branded search terms

  • socket security
  • socket.dev

Sonatype

1 branded search term

  • sonatype

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among dependency scanning tools

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.