Brandwave

Producer Loops vs Tracklib:Which is more popular?

In October 2026, Tracklib had more branded searches than Producer Loops among sample pack sites worldwide. Tracklib had about 22,200 branded searches, while Producer Loops had 2,400. Tracklib made up 6.8% of all sample pack site searches we track, and Producer Loops accounted for 0.73%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about sample pack sites, Tracklib appeared in two of the five answers and Producer Loops in none.

Among sample pack sites worldwide in October 2026

Who do people search for more?

Tracklib, about 9 searches for every 1 for Producer Loops

Tracklib 22.2K searchesProducer Loops 2.4K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Tracklib, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Producer Loops in 0

Tracklib in 2 of 5Producer Loops in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Tracklib, the only one of the two named

Tracklib first in 2Producer Loops never named

Follow Producer Loops vs Tracklib and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top sample pack sites in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Tracklib was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Producer Loops did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Splice1st
  2. Cymatics2nd
  3. Loopmasters3rd
  4. The Drum Broker4th
  5. Ghosthack5th
  6. Black Octopus Sound6th
  7. Loopcloud7th
  8. LANDR8th
  9. Tracklib9th
  10. +2 more
  11. Producer Loops–
  12. +2 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Splice4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Cymatics4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Loopmasters3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Tracklib2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Loopcloud2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • LANDR2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • The Drum Broker2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Ghosthack2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Black Octopus Sound2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Producer Loops0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+4 more

See every answer about sample pack sites

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 27, 2026.

Is Producer Loops or Tracklib more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Producer Loops and Tracklib by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 14 sample pack sites we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Producer Loops and Tracklib among sample pack sites worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Tracklib, Producer Loops. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthLoopermanSampleFocusSpliceTracklibLoopcloudLoopmastersLANDRCymaticsThe Drum BrokerGhosthackProducer LoopsADSR SoundsBlack Octopus SoundNoiiz
Nov 202552%15.6%6.7%8.6%4.7%3.8%1.4%1.5%1.8%1.4%1.1%0.49%0.49%0.41%
Dec 202553.8%16.2%7.4%7.3%4%3.2%1.4%1.3%1.3%1.8%0.96%0.43%0.51%0.35%
Jan 202651.9%19.1%6.9%8.5%3.8%3.1%1.1%1.4%1%0.93%0.93%0.41%0.41%0.41%
Feb 202651.7%19%6.7%8.5%3.1%3.8%1.4%1.3%1.2%1.1%0.91%0.41%0.41%0.41%
Mar 202653.9%19.8%6.5%7.3%2.7%3.2%1.2%1.2%1.3%0.96%0.78%0.35%0.35%0.51%
Apr 202653.7%19.8%7.2%7.2%2.6%2.6%1.2%1.2%1.6%0.96%0.77%0.35%0.35%0.35%
May 202654.3%20%6.8%7.3%2.7%2.7%0.97%1.4%1.3%0.97%0.78%0.27%0.27%0.27%
Jun 202650%22.4%7.5%6.7%4.5%2.5%1.1%1.5%1.2%1.1%0.73%0.3%0.27%0.27%
Jul 202651.9%19%6.8%8.5%3.8%2.5%1.1%1.8%1.3%1.1%0.91%0.31%0.41%0.28%
Aug 202653.2%19.6%7.6%7.2%3.9%2.6%0.95%1.5%0.9%0.95%0.77%0.26%0.34%0.23%
Sep 202651.2%23%7.1%6.9%3.1%2.5%1.1%1.4%1.2%0.9%0.74%0.31%0.31%0.31%
Oct 202650.2%22.5%6.9%6.8%4.5%2.5%1.6%1.2%1.2%0.88%0.73%0.3%0.3%0.3%

How has branded search for Producer Loops and Tracklib changed worldwide over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • Tracklib was ahead of Producer Loops in every measured month of the 12 months ending October 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Producer Loops’ share of searches among sample pack sites worldwide moved from 1.1% to 0.73%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 2.4K.
  • Across the 12 months ending October 2026, Tracklib’s share of searches among sample pack sites worldwide moved from 8.6% to 6.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 33.1K to 22.2K.

How did search popularity change for sample pack sites worldwide in October 2026?

2 changes
  1. Tracklib’s share of searches among sample pack sites worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 8.5% to 6.8% in October 2026.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Producer Loops worldwide fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 4.4K to 2.4K in October 2026.

How are Producer Loops’ and Tracklib’s branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Producer Loops’ and Tracklib’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Producer Loops

1 branded search term

  • producer loops

Tracklib

1 branded search term

  • tracklib

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among sample pack sites

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.