Pitchero vs Spond:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Spond had more branded searches than Pitchero among sports league management software worldwide. Spond had about 246,000 branded searches, while Pitchero had 18,100. Spond made up 28.2% of all sports league management software searches we track, and Pitchero accounted for 2.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about sports league management software, neither Pitchero nor Spond appeared in any of the five answers.
Who do people search for more?
Spond, about 14 searches for every 1 for Pitchero
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 0 of 5 answers.
Follow Pitchero vs Spond and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top sports league management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, neither Pitchero nor Spond showed up in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
TeamSnap4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
SportsEngine4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
LeagueApps4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
TeamSideline2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Jersey Watch2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
PlayHQ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Spond0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Pitchero0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
SportLoMo0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Demosphere0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about sports league management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which sports league management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best sports league management platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best sports league management software for a youth soccer club?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“sports league management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“youth sports software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Is Pitchero or Spond more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Pitchero and Spond by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 sports league management software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Spond, Pitchero. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | PlayHQ | Spond | TeamSnap | SportsEngine | Pitchero | SportLoMo | TeamSideline | LeagueApps | Demosphere | Heja | Stack Sports | Jersey Watch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 42.7% | 19.1% | 19.1% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Nov 2025 | 38.4% | 21% | 21% | 14.1% | 1.5% | 1% | 0.69% | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.25% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 28.5% | 23.4% | 19.1% | 23.4% | 1.1% | 0.93% | 0.93% | 1.1% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.34% | 0.23% |
| Jan 2026 | 25.4% | 25.4% | 20.9% | 20.9% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1% | 0.3% | 0.56% | 0.2% |
| Feb 2026 | 41% | 22.4% | 18.4% | 12.3% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.27% | 0.4% | 0.21% |
| Mar 2026 | 39.1% | 21.4% | 21.4% | 11.7% | 1.3% | 0.86% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.2% |
| Apr 2026 | 45.7% | 20.4% | 16.8% | 11.2% | 1.5% | 0.67% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.45% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.16% |
| May 2026 | 51.2% | 18.7% | 15.4% | 10.2% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.15% |
| Jun 2026 | 45.6% | 20.5% | 16.7% | 11.2% | 1.5% | 0.55% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.36% | 0.3% | 0.36% | 0.2% |
| Jul 2026 | 42.5% | 23.3% | 15.5% | 12.8% | 1.4% | 0.51% | 1.1% | 1.7% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.41% | 0.23% |
| Aug 2026 | 45% | 20.1% | 20.1% | 9.1% | 1.2% | 0.99% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.24% | 0.29% | 0.36% | 0.16% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.2% | 28.2% | 23.1% | 12.6% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.41% | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
How has the Pitchero and Spond comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Spond was ahead of Pitchero in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Pitchero’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide moved from 1.4% to 2.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 18.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Spond’s share of searches among sports league management software worldwide moved from 19.1% to 28.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 201K to 246K.
How did search popularity change for sports league management software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Pitchero overtook LeagueApps to rank 5th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches.
In September 2026, Spond gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 28.2%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Pitchero’s and Spond’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among sports league management software
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.