Nansen vs Scorechain:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Nansen had more branded searches than Scorechain among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide. Nansen had about 27,100 branded searches, while Scorechain had 1,300. Nansen made up 12.2% of all blockchain analytics platform searches we track, and Scorechain accounted for 0.58%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about blockchain analytics platforms, Nansen appeared in three of the five answers and Scorechain in two. Nansen and Scorechain were each mentioned first in two of the four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Nansen, about 21 searches for every 1 for Scorechain
Who does AI mention more?
Nansen, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Scorechain in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Nansen vs Scorechain and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top blockchain analytics platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Nansen was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Scorechain was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Nansen and Scorechain were each listed first in two of the four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Chainalysis1st
Dune2nd
Nansen3rd
Elliptic4th
TRM Labs5th
DefiLlama6th
Arkham7th
Glassnode8th
Scorechain9th
Token Terminal10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Chainalysis5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Elliptic4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
DefiLlama3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Nansen3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
TRM Labs3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Dune3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Arkham2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Glassnode2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Token Terminal2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Scorechain2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about blockchain analytics platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which blockchain analytics platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best blockchain analytics platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best blockchain analytics platform for crypto compliance?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“blockchain analytics platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“crypto compliance software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Nansen or Scorechain more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Nansen and Scorechain by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten blockchain analytics platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Nansen, Scorechain. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | DefiLlama | Nansen | Arkham | Chainalysis | TRM Labs | Elliptic | Glassnode | Token Terminal | Dune | Scorechain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 43.3% | 10.6% | 14.7% | 7.1% | 2.8% | 3.9% | 8.7% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 0.34% |
| Nov 2025 | 34.4% | 12.7% | 17.2% | 8.5% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 10.4% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 0.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 37% | 11.1% | 15% | 9.1% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 9.1% | 4% | 4.9% | 0.53% |
| Jan 2026 | 33.6% | 12.3% | 16.7% | 10.1% | 4.8% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 3% | 5.5% | 0.48% |
| Feb 2026 | 30.7% | 11.3% | 18.7% | 11.3% | 5.3% | 6.1% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 0.54% |
| Mar 2026 | 30.8% | 13.8% | 15% | 11.3% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 5% | 0.54% |
| Apr 2026 | 32.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | 11.9% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 7.9% | 2.4% | 5.3% | 0.7% |
| May 2026 | 32.6% | 11.9% | 16.2% | 11.9% | 5.6% | 8% | 6.5% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 0.71% |
| Jun 2026 | 34.2% | 12.5% | 13.8% | 10.2% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 8.4% | 3% | 3% | 0.74% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.7% | 13.1% | 11.9% | 10.7% | 6.2% | 7.1% | 8.7% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 0.77% |
| Aug 2026 | 36.8% | 13.5% | 12.2% | 11% | 6.4% | 6% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 0.65% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.6% | 12.2% | 11% | 10% | 7% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 3% | 0.58% |
How has the Nansen and Scorechain comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Nansen was ahead of Scorechain in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nansen’s share of searches among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide moved from 10.6% to 12.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 40.5K to 27.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Scorechain’s share of searches among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide moved from 0.34% to 0.58%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.3K.
How did search popularity change for blockchain analytics platforms worldwide in September 2026?
1 change

In September 2026, Nansen lost share of searches among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide, from 13.5% to 12.2%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Nansen’s and Scorechain’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Nansen
1 branded search term
- nansen
Scorechain
1 branded search term
- scorechain
Other head-to-heads among blockchain analytics platforms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.