Mozaik vs Polyboard:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Polyboard had more branded searches than Mozaik among cabinet design software worldwide. Polyboard had about 9,900 branded searches, while Mozaik had 4,480. Polyboard made up 28.7% of all cabinet design software searches we track, and Mozaik accounted for 13%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about cabinet design software, Mozaik appeared in four of the five answers and Polyboard in one. Mozaik was mentioned before Polyboard in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Polyboard, about 2 searches for every 1 for Mozaik
Who does AI mention more?
Mozaik, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Polyboard in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Mozaik, named ahead of Polyboard in 4 of 4 answers
Follow Mozaik vs Polyboard and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top cabinet design software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Mozaik was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Polyboard was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Mozaik was listed before Polyboard in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Cabinet Vision4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Mozaik4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
ProKitchen3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
SketchList3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
KCD2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Polyboard1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
2020 Design1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Microvellum0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- CabinetSense0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
CutList Plus0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about cabinet design software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which cabinet design software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best cabinet design software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best cabinet design software for a small cabinet shop?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“cabinet design software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“kitchen cabinet design software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.
Is Mozaik or Polyboard more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Mozaik and Polyboard by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten cabinet design software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Polyboard, Mozaik. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Polyboard | Cabinet Vision | ProKitchen | Mozaik | Microvellum | 2020 Design | CabinetSense | KCD | CutList Plus | SketchList |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 28.8% | 15.7% | 19.3% | 10.6% | 10.5% | 8.6% | 2.1% | 2.4% | 1.4% | 0.76% |
| Nov 2025 | 30.3% | 16.6% | 16.6% | 10.8% | 11% | 7.3% | 2.2% | 2.5% | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Dec 2025 | 30% | 16.4% | 16.4% | 13.6% | 8.8% | 7.3% | 2.2% | 3% | 1.5% | 0.97% |
| Jan 2026 | 28.7% | 15.7% | 15.7% | 13.5% | 10.4% | 8.5% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 0.93% |
| Feb 2026 | 25.7% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 14% | 11.4% | 7.5% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 1.5% | 0.83% |
| Mar 2026 | 28.2% | 18.9% | 15.4% | 13.3% | 10.3% | 6.8% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 0.75% |
| Apr 2026 | 31% | 16.9% | 16.9% | 11.8% | 9.2% | 7.4% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1% |
| May 2026 | 32.2% | 17.6% | 14.4% | 12.2% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 0.85% |
| Jun 2026 | 27.6% | 22.6% | 15% | 12.8% | 8.1% | 6.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 0.72% |
| Jul 2026 | 27.7% | 22.6% | 15.1% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 6.7% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 0.73% |
| Aug 2026 | 25.3% | 20.7% | 13.8% | 13.8% | 13.8% | 6.1% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.2% | 0.82% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.7% | 19.1% | 15.7% | 13% | 10.4% | 7% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.75% |
How has the Mozaik and Polyboard comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Polyboard was ahead of Mozaik in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mozaik’s share of searches among cabinet design software worldwide moved from 10.6% to 13%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 4.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Polyboard’s share of searches among cabinet design software worldwide moved from 28.8% to 28.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K.
How did search popularity change for cabinet design software worldwide in September 2026?
3 changes
In September 2026, ProKitchen overtook Microvellum and Mozaik to rank 3rd among cabinet design software worldwide, with 15.7% of the searches.
In September 2026, Polyboard gained share of searches among cabinet design software worldwide, from 25.3% to 28.7%.
In September 2026, Mozaik lost share of searches among cabinet design software worldwide, from 13.8% to 13%.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Mozaik’s and Polyboard’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among cabinet design software
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.