Brandwave

LeagueApps vs Spond:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Spond had more branded searches than LeagueApps among sports league management software worldwide. Spond had about 246,000 branded searches, while LeagueApps had 9,900. Spond made up 28.2% of all sports league management software searches we track, and LeagueApps accounted for 1.1%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about sports league management software, LeagueApps appeared in four of the five answers and Spond in none.

Among sports league management software worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Spond, about 25 searches for every 1 for LeagueApps

Spond 246K searchesLeagueApps 9.9K searches

Who does AI mention more?

LeagueApps, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Spond in 0

LeagueApps in 4 of 5Spond in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

LeagueApps, the only one of the two named

LeagueApps first in 3Spond never named

Follow LeagueApps vs Spond and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top sports league management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, LeagueApps was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Spond did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. SportsEngine1st
  2. LeagueApps2nd
  3. TeamSnap3rd
  4. TeamSideline4th
  5. Jersey Watch5th
  6. PlayHQ–
  7. Spond–
  8. Pitchero–
  9. SportLoMo–
  10. Demosphere–
  11. +2 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • TeamSnap4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • SportsEngine4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • LeagueApps4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • TeamSideline2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Jersey Watch2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • PlayHQ0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Spond0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Pitchero0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • SportLoMo0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Demosphere0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+2 more

See every answer about sports league management software

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 22, 2026.

Is LeagueApps or Spond more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for LeagueApps and Spond by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 12 sports league management software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

LeagueApps and Spond among sports league management software worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for Spond, LeagueApps. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthPlayHQSpondTeamSnapSportsEnginePitcheroSportLoMoTeamSidelineLeagueAppsDemosphereHejaStack SportsJersey Watch
Oct 202542.7%19.1%19.1%12.8%1.4%1.4%0.94%0.94%0.94%0.28%0.28%0.15%
Nov 202538.4%21%21%14.1%1.5%1%0.69%0.84%0.84%0.25%0.3%0.1%
Dec 202528.5%23.4%19.1%23.4%1.1%0.93%0.93%1.1%0.76%0.23%0.34%0.23%
Jan 202625.4%25.4%20.9%20.9%1.5%1.3%1.3%1.3%1%0.3%0.56%0.2%
Feb 202641%22.4%18.4%12.3%1.3%0.9%1.1%1.1%0.6%0.27%0.4%0.21%
Mar 202639.1%21.4%21.4%11.7%1.3%0.86%1.3%1.3%0.7%0.38%0.47%0.2%
Apr 202645.7%20.4%16.8%11.2%1.5%0.67%1.2%1.2%0.45%0.37%0.37%0.16%
May 202651.2%18.7%15.4%10.2%1.1%0.5%0.92%0.92%0.34%0.27%0.27%0.15%
Jun 202645.6%20.5%16.7%11.2%1.5%0.55%1.2%1.5%0.36%0.3%0.36%0.2%
Jul 202642.5%23.3%15.5%12.8%1.4%0.51%1.1%1.7%0.34%0.27%0.41%0.23%
Aug 202645%20.1%20.1%9.1%1.2%0.99%1.2%1.2%0.24%0.29%0.36%0.16%
Sep 202628.2%28.2%23.1%12.6%2.1%2.1%1.4%1.1%0.41%0.28%0.28%0.15%

How has the LeagueApps and Spond comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for sports league management software worldwide in September 2026?

3 changes

  1. In September 2026, Pitchero overtook LeagueApps to rank 5th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches.

  2. In September 2026, SportLoMo overtook LeagueApps and TeamSideline to rank 6th among sports league management software worldwide, with 2.1% of the searches.

  3. In September 2026, Spond gained share of searches among sports league management software worldwide, from 20.1% to 28.2%.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using LeagueApps’ and Spond’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

LeagueApps

1 branded search term

  • leagueapps

Spond

1 branded search term

  • spond

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among sports league management software

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free