Brandwave

Intruder vs ZAP:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, ZAP had more branded searches than Intruder among penetration testing platforms worldwide. ZAP had about 51,900 branded searches, while Intruder had 440. ZAP made up 5.1% of all penetration testing platform searches we track, and Intruder accounted for 0.04%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about penetration testing platforms, ZAP appeared in all five answers and Intruder in one. ZAP was mentioned before Intruder in four out of five answers.

Among penetration testing platforms worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

ZAP, about 118 searches for every 1 for Intruder

ZAP 51.9K searchesIntruder 440 searches

Who does AI mention more?

ZAP, mentioned in every answer we collected

ZAP in 5 of 5Intruder in 1 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

ZAP, named ahead of Intruder in 4 of 5 answers

ZAP first in 4Intruder first in 1

Follow Intruder vs ZAP and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top penetration testing platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, ZAP appeared in all five answers. Intruder was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. ZAP was listed before Intruder in four out of five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Burp Suite1st
  2. Kali Linux2nd
  3. Metasploit3rd
  4. ZAP4th
  5. Tenable5th
  6. Nmap6th
  7. Horizon3.ai7th
  8. Pentera8th
  9. Intruder9th
  10. Cobalt10th
  11. +1 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Burp Suite5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • ZAP5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Metasploit4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Kali Linux3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Nmap3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Tenable3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Pentera2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Horizon3.ai2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Cobalt1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Intruder1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers

+1 more

See every answer about penetration testing platforms

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Is Intruder or ZAP more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Intruder and ZAP by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 penetration testing platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Intruder and ZAP among penetration testing platforms worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for ZAP, Intruder. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthKali LinuxNmapBurp SuiteZAPTenableMetasploitPenteraHorizon3.aiAstra SecurityCobaltIntruder
Oct 202555.2%16.5%11.1%4.3%6.1%5%1%0.41%0.24%0.2%0.06%
Nov 202552.1%15.6%12.8%5%7%5.7%0.96%0.39%0.27%0.18%0.05%
Dec 202553.9%16.2%13.2%4.2%5.9%4.9%0.81%0.35%0.28%0.14%0.05%
Jan 202653.6%16.1%13.2%4.2%5.9%4.8%1.2%0.43%0.28%0.16%0.05%
Feb 202653.8%16.1%13.2%4.2%5.9%4.8%1%0.43%0.28%0.15%0.05%
Mar 202651.3%18.7%12.6%4.9%5.6%4.6%1.2%0.55%0.34%0.15%0.06%
Apr 202653.2%15.9%13%5%5.8%4.8%1%0.64%0.35%0.17%0.05%
May 202648.7%17.8%14.6%4.6%6.5%5.4%1.1%0.72%0.39%0.16%0.06%
Jun 202652.3%15.7%12.8%6%5.8%4.7%1.2%0.87%0.42%0.18%0.06%
Jul 202651.1%18.7%12.5%4.8%5.6%4.6%1.2%0.85%0.41%0.17%0.05%
Aug 202656%16.8%11.2%4.3%5%4.1%1%0.88%0.37%0.15%0.04%
Sep 202654.1%16.2%13.3%5.1%4.9%4%1%0.92%0.35%0.16%0.04%

How has the Intruder and ZAP comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • ZAP was ahead of Intruder in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Intruder’s share of searches among penetration testing platforms worldwide moved from 0.06% to 0.04%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 680 to 440.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, ZAP’s share of searches among penetration testing platforms worldwide moved from 4.3% to 5.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 52.4K to 51.9K.

How did search popularity change for penetration testing platforms worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes

  1. In September 2026, ZAP overtook Tenable to rank 4th among penetration testing platforms worldwide, with 5.1% of the searches.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Intruder worldwide fell 35.3% over 12 measured months, from 680 to 440 in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

4 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Intruder’s and ZAP’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Intruder

2 branded search terms

  • intruder io
  • intruder penetration testing

ZAP

2 branded search terms

  • owasp zap
  • zap proxy

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among penetration testing platforms

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free