IBM Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, IBM Process Mining had more branded searches than Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining among process mining platforms worldwide. IBM Process Mining had about 320 branded searches, while Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining had 140. IBM Process Mining made up 0.15% of all process mining platform searches we track, and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining accounted for 0.07%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow IBM Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is IBM Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining more popular in search?
Compare the platforms that analyse how processes run. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | UiPath | Celonis | Signavio | Software AG | Apromore | KYP.ai | IBM Process Mining | Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 61.5% | 22.6% | 10.1% | 3% | 2.5% | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Nov 2025 | 54% | 29.6% | 10.8% | 4% | 1.2% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 0.04% |
| Dec 2025 | 61.2% | 27.4% | 6.7% | 3.7% | 0.7% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.05% |
| Jan 2026 | 60.2% | 27% | 8.1% | 3.6% | 0.69% | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
| Feb 2026 | 55.7% | 30.5% | 9.2% | 3.3% | 0.78% | 0.2% | 0.16% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 54.5% | 29.9% | 10.9% | 3.3% | 0.97% | 0.24% | 0.19% | 0.07% |
| Apr 2026 | 56% | 30.7% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 0.79% | 0.24% | 0.2% | 0.06% |
| May 2026 | 52.4% | 35.1% | 8.6% | 2.6% | 0.93% | 0.23% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Jun 2026 | 50.9% | 34.2% | 10.3% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.22% | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Jul 2026 | 52% | 35% | 8.6% | 3.1% | 0.9% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Aug 2026 | 50.7% | 33.9% | 10.1% | 3.7% | 1.1% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 52.1% | 35% | 8.6% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
How has the IBM Process Mining and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- IBM Process Mining was ahead of Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, IBM Process Mining’s share of searches among process mining platforms worldwide held steady at 0.15%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 480 to 320.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining’s share of searches among process mining platforms worldwide moved from 0.03% to 0.07%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 110 to 140.
How did search popularity change for process mining platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, IBM Process Mining fell from 6th to 7th among process mining platforms worldwide.
Estimated monthly branded searches for Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining worldwide rose 27.3% over 12 measured months, from 110 to 140 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using IBM Process Mining’s and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
IBM Process Mining
1 branded search term
- ibm process mining
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
1 branded search term
- microsoft power automate process mining
Other head-to-heads among process mining platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.