Brandwave

Google Security Operations vs LogRhythm:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, LogRhythm had more branded searches than Google Security Operations among security operations platforms worldwide. LogRhythm had about 5,400 branded searches, while Google Security Operations had 880. LogRhythm made up 1.9% of all security operations platform searches we track, and Google Security Operations accounted for 0.31%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about security operations platforms, Google Security Operations appeared in three of the five answers and LogRhythm in none.

Among security operations platforms worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

LogRhythm, about 6 searches for every 1 for Google Security Operations

LogRhythm 5.4K searchesGoogle Security Operations 880 searches

Who does AI mention more?

Google Security Operations, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, LogRhythm in 0

Google Security Operations in 3 of 5LogRhythm in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Google Security Operations, the only one of the two named

Google Security Operations first in 2LogRhythm never named

Follow Google Security Operations vs LogRhythm and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top security operations platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Google Security Operations was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. LogRhythm did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Microsoft Sentinel1st
  2. Splunk2nd
  3. CrowdStrike3rd
  4. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM4th
  5. IBM QRadar5th
  6. Wazuh6th
  7. Google Security Operations6th
  8. Sumo Logic–
  9. Securonix–
  10. +1 more
  11. LogRhythm–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Splunk4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Microsoft Sentinel4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • CrowdStrike3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Google Security Operations3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Wazuh2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • IBM QRadar1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Sumo Logic0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Securonix0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • LogRhythm0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+1 more

See every answer about security operations platforms

5 answers

Not named in any answer:

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Is Google Security Operations or LogRhythm more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Google Security Operations and LogRhythm by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 security operations platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

Google Security Operations and LogRhythm among security operations platforms worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for LogRhythm, Google Security Operations. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthSplunkWazuhMicrosoft SentinelSumo LogicSecuronixExabeamLogRhythmIBM QRadarCrowdStrikeGoogle Security OperationsPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Oct 202555.9%25.2%6.2%4.1%1.8%2.3%2.3%1.5%0.45%0.28%0.03%
Nov 202551.6%28.3%7%4.6%1.7%2.1%2.1%1.7%0.5%0.41%0.02%
Dec 202552.1%28.6%5.7%3.8%3.8%2.1%1.7%1.4%0.41%0.32%0.03%
Jan 202651.7%28.3%7%4.6%2.1%2.1%2.1%1.4%0.5%0.31%0.03%
Feb 202652%28.5%7%3.8%2.1%2.1%2.1%1.4%0.5%0.5%0.07%
Mar 202651.5%28.3%6.9%4.6%2.1%2.1%2.1%1.7%0.41%0.31%0.07%
Apr 202652%28.5%7%3.8%2.1%2.1%2.1%1.7%0.41%0.31%0.08%
May 202646.9%31.4%7.7%5.1%2.3%2.3%1.9%1.5%0.45%0.35%0.11%
Jun 202652.2%28.6%7%3.8%2.1%2.1%1.7%1.4%0.32%0.51%0.19%
Jul 202648.1%32.3%7.9%3.5%1.9%1.9%1.9%1.3%0.36%0.57%0.17%
Aug 202648.2%32.3%7.9%3.5%2.4%1.9%1.9%1%0.36%0.36%0.11%
Sep 202648%32.2%7.9%3.5%2.3%1.9%1.9%1.3%0.46%0.31%0.11%

How has the Google Security Operations and LogRhythm comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for security operations platforms worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes

  1. Estimated monthly branded searches for LogRhythm worldwide fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 8.1K to 5.4K in September 2026.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Google Security Operations worldwide fell 12% over 12 measured months, from 1K to 880 in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Google Security Operations’ and LogRhythm’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Google Security Operations

1 branded search term

  • google security operations

LogRhythm

1 branded search term

  • logrhythm

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among security operations platforms

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free