Font Awesome vs Heroicons:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Font Awesome had more branded searches than Heroicons among icon libraries worldwide. Font Awesome had about 246,000 branded searches, while Heroicons had 22,200. Font Awesome made up 14.2% of all icon library searches we track, and Heroicons accounted for 1.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about icon libraries, Heroicons appeared in four of the five answers and Font Awesome in three. Heroicons was mentioned before Font Awesome in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Font Awesome, about 11 searches for every 1 for Heroicons
Who does AI mention more?
Heroicons, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Font Awesome in 3
Who does AI recommend more?
Heroicons, named ahead of Font Awesome in 4 of 4 answers
Follow Font Awesome vs Heroicons and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top icon libraries in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Heroicons was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Font Awesome was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Heroicons was listed before Font Awesome in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Lucide1st
Phosphor Icons2nd
Heroicons3rd
Material Symbols4th
Tabler Icons5th
Font Awesome6th
Flaticon7th
Iconoir8th
Noun Project9th
Iconify10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Lucide4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Phosphor Icons4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Heroicons4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Material Symbols4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Font Awesome3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Iconoir3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Tabler Icons2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Flaticon1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Noun Project1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Iconify1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about icon libraries
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which icon library should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best icon libraries?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best icon library for app design?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“icon libraries”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“free icon set”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Font Awesome or Heroicons more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Font Awesome and Heroicons by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten icon libraries we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Font Awesome, Heroicons. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Flaticon | Font Awesome | Noun Project | Lucide | Iconify | Phosphor Icons | Tabler Icons | Heroicons | Material Symbols | Iconoir |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 59.4% | 17.8% | 11.9% | 3.6% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 2% | 0.72% | 0.26% |
| Nov 2025 | 59.6% | 17.9% | 12% | 3.6% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 2% | 0.59% | 0.21% |
| Dec 2025 | 59.7% | 18% | 9.8% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 2% | 0.72% | 0.22% |
| Jan 2026 | 57.8% | 17.4% | 11.6% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.3% | 0.86% | 0.21% |
| Feb 2026 | 58.2% | 17.5% | 11.7% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 0.86% | 0.21% |
| Mar 2026 | 55.4% | 16.7% | 13.7% | 5% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.2% | 0.82% | 0.24% |
| Apr 2026 | 57% | 17.2% | 11.5% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 0.85% | 0.25% |
| May 2026 | 59.3% | 14.6% | 12% | 5.4% | 2.4% | 2% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.88% | 0.21% |
| Jun 2026 | 59.3% | 14.6% | 12% | 5.4% | 2.4% | 2% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.88% | 0.21% |
| Jul 2026 | 55.5% | 16.7% | 11.2% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1% | 0.3% |
| Aug 2026 | 58.2% | 14.3% | 11.7% | 6.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 0.86% | 0.31% |
| Sep 2026 | 57.7% | 14.2% | 14.2% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.85% | 0.25% |
How has the Font Awesome and Heroicons comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Font Awesome was ahead of Heroicons in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Font Awesome’s share of searches among icon libraries worldwide moved from 17.8% to 14.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 450K to 246K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Heroicons’ share of searches among icon libraries worldwide moved from 2% to 1.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 49.5K to 22.2K.
How did search popularity change for icon libraries worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

Estimated monthly branded searches for Heroicons worldwide fell 55.2% over 12 measured months, from 49.5K to 22.2K in September 2026.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Font Awesome worldwide fell 45.3% over 12 measured months, from 450K to 246K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Font Awesome’s and Heroicons’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Font Awesome
1 branded search term
- font awesome
Heroicons
1 branded search term
- heroicons
Other head-to-heads among icon libraries

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.