Brandwave

Exaco vs Juliana:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Juliana had more branded searches than Exaco among greenhouse brands worldwide. Juliana had about 880 branded searches, while Exaco had 610. Juliana made up 1.7% of all greenhouse brand searches we track, and Exaco accounted for 1.2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about greenhouse brands, Exaco appeared in two of the four answers and Juliana in none.

Among greenhouse brands worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Juliana, about 44% more searches than Exaco

Juliana 880 searchesExaco 610 searches

Who does AI mention more?

Exaco, mentioned in 2 of 4 answers, Juliana in 0

Exaco in 2 of 4Juliana in 0 of 4

Who does AI recommend more?

Exaco, the only one of the two named

Exaco first in 2Juliana never named

Follow Exaco vs Juliana and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top greenhouse brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Exaco was mentioned in two out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Juliana did not appear in any of the four answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Palram1st
  2. Exaco2nd
  3. Backyard Discovery3rd
  4. Halls3rd
  5. Rion5th
  6. Vegepod–
  7. Juliana–
  8. Vitavia–
  9. Eden–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Palram3 of 4Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Backyard Discovery2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Exaco2 of 4Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Halls1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Rion1 of 4Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Vegepod0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Juliana0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Vitavia0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers
  • Eden0 of 4Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 1 Google answers

See every answer about greenhouse brands

4 answers
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “Which greenhouse brand should I buy?”

    1. 1Exaco
    2. 2Palram
    3. 3Backyard Discovery
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What are the best greenhouse brands?”

    1. 1Palram
    2. 2Halls
    3. 3Rion
  • Asked ChatGPT

    “What's the best greenhouse brand for year round gardening?”

    1. 1Palram
    2. 2Exaco
    3. 3Backyard Discovery
  • Searched Google, AI Overview

    “small greenhouse”

    1. Searched Google, AI Overview

      “garden greenhouse”

      Google showed no AI Overview for this search.

    Not named in any answer:

    Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

    Is Exaco or Juliana more popular in search?

    This chart shows how often people search Google for Exaco and Juliana by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine greenhouse brands we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

    Exaco and Juliana among greenhouse brands worldwide, by month

    Share of searches by month for Juliana, Exaco. The figures are in the table below the chart.

    View monthly share of searches table
    MonthBackyard DiscoveryVegepodHallsPalramJulianaVitaviaExacoEdenRion
    Oct 202541.8%27.9%8.3%15.2%1.7%1.7%1.4%1.7%0.32%
    Nov 202544.2%29.6%7.1%13.2%1.8%1.4%1.5%0.95%0.27%
    Dec 202549.2%26.9%6.5%12%1.6%1.3%1.4%0.87%0.3%
    Jan 202644.2%24.2%10.7%13.2%2.1%2.1%1.9%1.2%0.34%
    Feb 202650.8%18.5%10.1%12.4%2%2.3%2.3%1.3%0.32%
    Mar 202658.8%17.6%9.6%7.8%1.9%1.9%1.1%1%0.31%
    Apr 202657.1%17.1%11.4%7.6%1.8%2.8%0.85%1.2%0.2%
    May 202664.3%12.9%10.5%7%1.7%1.7%0.78%0.93%0.22%
    Jun 202664.3%12.9%8.6%8.6%2.1%1.4%1.2%0.94%0.17%
    Jul 202660.3%18%6.6%9.8%1.6%1.3%1.3%0.87%0.2%
    Aug 202649.3%26.9%8%9.8%1.6%1.6%1.3%1.1%0.25%
    Sep 202642.8%34.9%8.5%8.5%1.7%1.4%1.2%0.92%0.21%

    How has the Exaco and Juliana comparison changed over the last 12 months?

    3 findings
    • The lead changed hands 2 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: Exaco took it in February 2026, Juliana took it in March 2026.
    • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Exaco’s share of searches among greenhouse brands worldwide moved from 1.4% to 1.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 610.
    • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Juliana’s share of searches among greenhouse brands worldwide held steady at 1.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 720 to 880.

    How did search popularity change for greenhouse brands worldwide in September 2026?

    1 change
    1. Estimated monthly branded searches for Juliana worldwide rose 22.2% over 12 measured months, from 720 to 880 in September 2026.

    How are branded searches counted?

    3 search terms

    Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Exaco’s and Juliana’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

    Exaco

    2 branded search terms

    • exaco greenhouse
    • exaco riga

    Juliana

    1 branded search term

    • juliana greenhouse

    How the Brand Demand Index is measured

    Other head-to-heads among greenhouse brands

    Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

    Put your own brand in this comparison

    Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.