Elliptic vs Scorechain:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Elliptic had more branded searches than Scorechain among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide. Elliptic had about 14,800 branded searches, while Scorechain had 1,300. Elliptic made up 6.6% of all blockchain analytics platform searches we track, and Scorechain accounted for 0.58%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about blockchain analytics platforms, Elliptic appeared in four of the five answers and Scorechain in two. Elliptic was mentioned before Scorechain in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Elliptic, about 11 searches for every 1 for Scorechain
Who does AI mention more?
Elliptic, mentioned in 4 of 5 answers, Scorechain in 2
Who does AI recommend more?
Elliptic, named ahead of Scorechain in 4 of 4 answers
Follow Elliptic vs Scorechain and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top blockchain analytics platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Elliptic was mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Scorechain was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Elliptic was listed before Scorechain in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Chainalysis1st
Dune2nd
Nansen3rd- Elliptic4th
TRM Labs5th
DefiLlama6th
Arkham7th
Glassnode8th
Scorechain9th
Token Terminal10th
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
- Chainalysis5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- Elliptic4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
- DefiLlama3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Nansen3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- TRM Labs3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Dune3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Arkham2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
- Glassnode2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Token Terminal2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
- Scorechain2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about blockchain analytics platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which blockchain analytics platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best blockchain analytics platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best blockchain analytics platform for crypto compliance?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“blockchain analytics platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“crypto compliance software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Elliptic or Scorechain more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Elliptic and Scorechain by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten blockchain analytics platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Elliptic, Scorechain. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | DefiLlama | Nansen | Arkham | Chainalysis | TRM Labs | Elliptic | Glassnode | Token Terminal | Dune | Scorechain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 43.3% | 10.6% | 14.7% | 7.1% | 2.8% | 3.9% | 8.7% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 0.34% |
| Nov 2025 | 34.4% | 12.7% | 17.2% | 8.5% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 10.4% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 0.5% |
| Dec 2025 | 37% | 11.1% | 15% | 9.1% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 9.1% | 4% | 4.9% | 0.53% |
| Jan 2026 | 33.6% | 12.3% | 16.7% | 10.1% | 4.8% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 3% | 5.5% | 0.48% |
| Feb 2026 | 30.7% | 11.3% | 18.7% | 11.3% | 5.3% | 6.1% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 4.1% | 0.54% |
| Mar 2026 | 30.8% | 13.8% | 15% | 11.3% | 5.4% | 6.2% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 5% | 0.54% |
| Apr 2026 | 32.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | 11.9% | 4.7% | 6.5% | 7.9% | 2.4% | 5.3% | 0.7% |
| May 2026 | 32.6% | 11.9% | 16.2% | 11.9% | 5.6% | 8% | 6.5% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 0.71% |
| Jun 2026 | 34.2% | 12.5% | 13.8% | 10.2% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 8.4% | 3% | 3% | 0.74% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.7% | 13.1% | 11.9% | 10.7% | 6.2% | 7.1% | 8.7% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 0.77% |
| Aug 2026 | 36.8% | 13.5% | 12.2% | 11% | 6.4% | 6% | 7.4% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 0.65% |
| Sep 2026 | 40.6% | 12.2% | 11% | 10% | 7% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 3% | 0.58% |
How has the Elliptic and Scorechain comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Elliptic was ahead of Scorechain in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Elliptic’s share of searches among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide moved from 3.9% to 6.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 14.8K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Scorechain’s share of searches among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide moved from 0.34% to 0.58%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 1.3K.
How did search popularity change for blockchain analytics platforms worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
In September 2026, Elliptic overtook Glassnode to rank 6th among blockchain analytics platforms worldwide, with 6.6% of the searches.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Elliptic’s and Scorechain’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Elliptic
1 branded search term
- elliptic
Scorechain
1 branded search term
- scorechain
Other head-to-heads among blockchain analytics platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.