Brandwave

CourtListener vs Justia:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, CourtListener had more branded searches than Justia among legal research platforms worldwide. CourtListener had about 22,200 branded searches, while Justia had 18,100. CourtListener made up 3.1% of all legal research platform searches we track, and Justia accounted for 2.5%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about legal research platforms, CourtListener appeared in three of the five answers and Justia in two. CourtListener was mentioned before Justia in three out of four answers that named either.

Among legal research platforms worldwide in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

CourtListener, about 23% more searches than Justia

CourtListener 22.2K searchesJustia 18.1K searches

Who does AI mention more?

CourtListener, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Justia in 2

CourtListener in 3 of 5Justia in 2 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

CourtListener, named ahead of Justia in 3 of 4 answers

CourtListener first in 3Justia first in 1

Follow CourtListener vs Justia and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top legal research platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, CourtListener was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Justia was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. CourtListener was listed before Justia in three out of four answers that named either.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Westlaw1st
  2. Bloomberg Law2nd
  3. Lexis+ AI3rd
  4. LexisNexis4th
  5. Fastcase5th
  6. CourtListener6th
  7. vLex7th
  8. Justia8th
  9. Casetext9th

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • LexisNexis5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Westlaw5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Bloomberg Law5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Lexis+ AI4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Fastcase4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • CourtListener3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • vLex2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Justia2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Casetext2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers

See every answer about legal research platforms

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.

Is CourtListener or Justia more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for CourtListener and Justia by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine legal research platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.

CourtListener and Justia among legal research platforms worldwide, by month

Share of searches by month for CourtListener, Justia. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthLexisNexisWestlawvLexCourtListenerJustiaLexis+ AIBloomberg LawCasetextFastcase
Oct 202541.8%41.8%6.9%1.7%2.5%2.4%1.7%0.75%0.5%
Nov 202544.3%36.2%8.9%2.2%2.7%2.5%1.8%0.97%0.43%
Dec 202544.7%36.5%7.4%2.7%3.3%2.1%1.8%0.98%0.53%
Jan 202644.7%36.6%7.4%3.3%2.7%2.1%2.2%0.65%0.43%
Feb 202647.1%31.5%6.3%5.2%4.2%2.2%2.3%0.84%0.37%
Mar 202648.5%32.4%8%2.9%2%2.9%2.4%0.47%0.47%
Apr 202647.4%31.6%9.5%3.5%2.3%3%1.6%0.57%0.46%
May 202647.6%31.8%9.6%3.5%2.3%2.6%1.6%0.46%0.46%
Jun 202646.8%31.3%11.5%3.5%1.9%2.7%1.5%0.45%0.37%
Jul 202649.8%27.3%12.2%3.7%2%2.5%1.6%0.31%0.48%
Aug 202649.4%33%6.6%3.6%2%2.5%2%0.26%0.59%
Sep 202642%34.3%12.6%3.1%2.5%2.3%1.7%0.92%0.5%

How has the CourtListener and Justia comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • The lead changed hands once in the 12 months ending September 2026: CourtListener took it in January 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, CourtListener’s share of searches among legal research platforms worldwide moved from 1.7% to 3.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 22.2K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Justia’s share of searches among legal research platforms worldwide held steady at 2.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 18.1K.

How did search popularity change for legal research platforms worldwide in September 2026?

2 changes

  1. In September 2026, Justia overtook Lexis+ AI and Bloomberg Law to rank 5th among legal research platforms worldwide, with 2.5% of the searches.

  2. In September 2026, CourtListener lost share of searches among legal research platforms worldwide, from 3.6% to 3.1%.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using CourtListener’s and Justia’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

CourtListener

1 branded search term

  • courtlistener

Justia

1 branded search term

  • justia

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among legal research platforms

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.

Start free