CosmoLex vs PracticePanther:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, PracticePanther had more branded searches than CosmoLex among legal practice software worldwide. PracticePanther had about 12,100 branded searches, while CosmoLex had 6,600. PracticePanther made up 12.7% of all legal practice software searches we track, and CosmoLex accounted for 6.9%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow CosmoLex vs PracticePanther and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is CosmoLex or PracticePanther more popular in search?
Compare the legal practice software people choose between. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for PracticePanther, CosmoLex. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Filevine | Actionstep | PracticePanther | Smokeball | CosmoLex | CASEpeer | Clio | LEAP | MyCase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 33.6% | 22.6% | 12.3% | 12.3% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 2.8% | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Nov 2025 | 30.7% | 25.1% | 11.2% | 13.7% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 1.2% | 0.16% |
| Dec 2025 | 33.2% | 22.2% | 12.1% | 12.1% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 2.9% | 1.1% | 0.13% |
| Jan 2026 | 35.1% | 19.2% | 12.8% | 12.8% | 8.6% | 7% | 3.3% | 1.2% | 0.12% |
| Feb 2026 | 33.5% | 22.5% | 10% | 15% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 3% | 1% | 0.14% |
| Mar 2026 | 30.9% | 25.3% | 11.3% | 13.8% | 7.6% | 6.2% | 3.5% | 1.4% | 0.16% |
| Apr 2026 | 34.3% | 23% | 10.2% | 12.5% | 8.4% | 6.8% | 2.9% | 1.7% | 0.14% |
| May 2026 | 36.4% | 19.9% | 10.9% | 13.3% | 8.9% | 5.9% | 3% | 1.5% | 0.12% |
| Jun 2026 | 35.6% | 19.5% | 13% | 13% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 0.15% |
| Jul 2026 | 35.4% | 19.3% | 12.9% | 15.8% | 7.1% | 5.8% | 2.5% | 1.1% | 0.12% |
| Aug 2026 | 36.4% | 19.9% | 13.3% | 13.3% | 7.3% | 5.9% | 2.6% | 1.1% | 0.12% |
| Sep 2026 | 34.7% | 23.3% | 12.7% | 12.7% | 6.9% | 5.7% | 2.7% | 1.1% | 0.15% |
How has the CosmoLex and PracticePanther comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- PracticePanther was ahead of CosmoLex in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, CosmoLex’s share of searches among legal practice software worldwide moved from 8.2% to 6.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 6.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, PracticePanther’s share of searches among legal practice software worldwide moved from 12.3% to 12.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 12.1K.
How did search popularity change for legal practice software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, PracticePanther lost share of searches among legal practice software worldwide, from 13.3% to 12.7%.
Estimated monthly branded searches for CosmoLex worldwide fell 18.5% over 12 measured months, from 8.1K to 6.6K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using CosmoLex’s and PracticePanther’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
CosmoLex
1 branded search term
- cosmolex
PracticePanther
1 branded search term
- practicepanther
Other head-to-heads among legal practice software
Filevine vs Actionstep: compare search popularity- Filevine vs PracticePanther: compare search popularity
Filevine vs Smokeball: compare search popularity- Filevine vs CosmoLex: compare search popularity
- Actionstep vs PracticePanther: compare search popularity
- Actionstep vs Smokeball: compare search popularity
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.