Chaser vs Esker:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Chaser had more branded searches than Esker among accounts receivable automation platforms worldwide. Chaser had about 370 branded searches, while Esker had 30. Chaser made up 0.37% of all accounts receivable automation platform searches we track, and Esker accounted for 0.03%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about accounts receivable automation platforms, Chaser appeared in three of the five answers and Esker in one. Chaser was mentioned before Esker in two out of three answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Chaser, about 12 searches for every 1 for Esker
Who does AI mention more?
Chaser, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Esker in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
Chaser, named ahead of Esker in 2 of 3 answers
Follow Chaser vs Esker and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top accounts receivable automation platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Chaser was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Esker was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Chaser was listed before Esker in two out of three answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
HighRadius5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Versapay5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Billtrust4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
BILL3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Chaser3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Upflow2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Tesorio1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Esker1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
YayPay0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about accounts receivable automation platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which accounts receivable automation platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best accounts receivable automation platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best accounts receivable automation platform for collecting payments?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“accounts receivable automation”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“accounts receivable software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Chaser or Esker more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Chaser and Esker by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all nine accounts receivable automation platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Chaser, Esker. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | BILL | HighRadius | Billtrust | Versapay | Upflow | Tesorio | YayPay | Chaser | Esker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 52.4% | 21.6% | 9.6% | 9.6% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 0.97% | 0.39% | 0.07% |
| Nov 2025 | 49.6% | 25% | 9.1% | 9% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 0.98% | 0.39% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 49.7% | 25% | 9.1% | 9.1% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 0.98% | 0.31% | 0.03% |
| Jan 2026 | 48.4% | 24.4% | 8.9% | 10.8% | 4% | 2.1% | 0.96% | 0.47% | 0.03% |
| Feb 2026 | 48.4% | 24.4% | 8.9% | 10.8% | 4% | 2.1% | 0.96% | 0.44% | 0.04% |
| Mar 2026 | 52.1% | 21.5% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 4.3% | 1.8% | 0.84% | 0.41% | 0.04% |
| Apr 2026 | 44.8% | 27.4% | 10% | 10% | 4.5% | 1.9% | 0.89% | 0.4% | 0.05% |
| May 2026 | 49.7% | 24.9% | 9.1% | 9.1% | 4.1% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.51% | 0.03% |
| Jun 2026 | 51.6% | 25.9% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 4.2% | 1.6% | 0.84% | 0.38% | 0.02% |
| Jul 2026 | 46.5% | 28.4% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 4.7% | 2% | 0.92% | 0.55% | 0.02% |
| Aug 2026 | 47.1% | 28.8% | 8.6% | 8.6% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
| Sep 2026 | 45% | 27.5% | 10% | 10% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 0.89% | 0.37% | 0.03% |
How has the Chaser and Esker comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Chaser was ahead of Esker in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Chaser’s share of searches among accounts receivable automation platforms worldwide moved from 0.39% to 0.37%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 400 to 370.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Esker’s share of searches among accounts receivable automation platforms worldwide moved from 0.07% to 0.03%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 70 to 30.
How did search popularity change for accounts receivable automation platforms worldwide in September 2026?
1 change
Estimated monthly branded searches for Esker worldwide fell 57.1% over 12 measured months, from 70 to 30 in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Chaser’s and Esker’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among accounts receivable automation platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.