Blue Yonder vs Extensiv:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Blue Yonder had more branded searches than Extensiv among warehouse management software worldwide. Blue Yonder had about 60,500 branded searches, while Extensiv had 9,900. Blue Yonder made up 24.2% of all warehouse management software searches we track, and Extensiv accounted for 4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about warehouse management software, Blue Yonder appeared in three of the five answers and Extensiv in none.
Who do people search for more?
Blue Yonder, about 6 searches for every 1 for Extensiv
Who does AI mention more?
Blue Yonder, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Extensiv in 0
Who does AI recommend more?
Blue Yonder, the only one of the two named
Follow Blue Yonder vs Extensiv and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top warehouse management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Blue Yonder was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Extensiv did not appear in any of the five answers.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Blue Yonder3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Zoho Inventory3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Manhattan Associates3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Cin73 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Fishbowl3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
ShipHero2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
HighJump0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Extensiv0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Korber0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about warehouse management software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which warehouse management software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best warehouse management software tools?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best warehouse management software for a warehouse team?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“warehouse management software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“inventory management software”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Blue Yonder or Extensiv more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Blue Yonder and Extensiv by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 warehouse management software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Blue Yonder, Extensiv. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Blue Yonder | Zoho Inventory | HighJump | Manhattan Associates | Cin7 | Extensiv | Korber | ShipHero | Fishbowl | Descartes MacroPoint | Manhattan Active Warehouse Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 25.7% | 25.7% | 21% | 6.3% | 7.8% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 2% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
| Nov 2025 | 22.6% | 27.7% | 22.6% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 3.7% | 3% | 4.5% | 1.7% | 0.27% | 0.1% |
| Dec 2025 | 19.4% | 29% | 23.7% | 8.7% | 6.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 4.7% | 1.5% | 0.23% | 0.1% |
| Jan 2026 | 20.5% | 25.1% | 25.1% | 9.2% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 1.6% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| Feb 2026 | 21% | 25.6% | 25.6% | 9.4% | 6.4% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 1.6% | 0.31% | 0.35% |
| Mar 2026 | 23% | 23% | 28.1% | 6.9% | 7% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 1.5% | 0.27% | 0.4% |
| Apr 2026 | 21.2% | 26% | 26% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.6% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| May 2026 | 21.5% | 26.3% | 26.3% | 6.4% | 6.8% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 1.4% | 0.26% | 0.31% |
| Jun 2026 | 22.2% | 27.2% | 22.2% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 3% | 3.6% | 1.4% | 0.26% | 0.12% |
| Jul 2026 | 22.4% | 27.4% | 18.3% | 12.2% | 8.3% | 3% | 3% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 0.27% | 0.14% |
| Aug 2026 | 22.9% | 22.9% | 22.9% | 12.5% | 7.2% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Sep 2026 | 24.2% | 24.2% | 19.8% | 10.8% | 7.6% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 1.2% | 0.29% | 0.13% |
How has the Blue Yonder and Extensiv comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Blue Yonder was ahead of Extensiv in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Blue Yonder’s share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide moved from 25.7% to 24.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 74K to 60.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Extensiv’s share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide moved from 3.4% to 4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 9.9K.
How did search popularity change for warehouse management software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Extensiv overtook ShipHero to rank 6th among warehouse management software worldwide, with 4% of the searches.

In September 2026, Blue Yonder gained share of searches among warehouse management software worldwide, from 22.9% to 24.2%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Blue Yonder’s and Extensiv’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Blue Yonder
1 branded search term
- blue yonder
Extensiv
1 branded search term
- extensiv
Other head-to-heads among warehouse management software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.