Apromore vs IBM Process Mining:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Apromore had more branded searches than IBM Process Mining among process mining platforms worldwide. Apromore had about 2,900 branded searches, while IBM Process Mining had 320. Apromore made up 1.4% of all process mining platform searches we track, and IBM Process Mining accounted for 0.15%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about process mining platforms, Apromore and IBM Process Mining each appeared in three of the five answers. Apromore and IBM Process Mining were each mentioned first in two of the four answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Apromore, about 9 searches for every 1 for IBM Process Mining
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 3 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
Each is named first in 2 of 4 answers.
Follow Apromore vs IBM Process Mining and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top process mining platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Apromore was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. IBM Process Mining was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Apromore and IBM Process Mining were each listed first in two of the four answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
UiPath5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Celonis5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Signavio5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Apromore3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- IBM Process Mining3 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
KYP.ai2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Software AG1 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about process mining platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which process mining platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best process mining platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best process mining platform for process bottlenecks?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“process mining platforms”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“process mining software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 21, 2026.
Is Apromore or IBM Process Mining more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Apromore and IBM Process Mining by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all eight process mining platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Apromore, IBM Process Mining. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | UiPath | Celonis | Signavio | Software AG | Apromore | KYP.ai | IBM Process Mining | Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 61.5% | 22.6% | 10.1% | 3% | 2.5% | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Nov 2025 | 54% | 29.6% | 10.8% | 4% | 1.2% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 0.04% |
| Dec 2025 | 61.2% | 27.4% | 6.7% | 3.7% | 0.7% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.05% |
| Jan 2026 | 60.2% | 27% | 8.1% | 3.6% | 0.69% | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.08% |
| Feb 2026 | 55.7% | 30.5% | 9.2% | 3.3% | 0.78% | 0.2% | 0.16% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 54.5% | 29.9% | 10.9% | 3.3% | 0.97% | 0.24% | 0.19% | 0.07% |
| Apr 2026 | 56% | 30.7% | 9.2% | 2.7% | 0.79% | 0.24% | 0.2% | 0.06% |
| May 2026 | 52.4% | 35.1% | 8.6% | 2.6% | 0.93% | 0.23% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Jun 2026 | 50.9% | 34.2% | 10.3% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.22% | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Jul 2026 | 52% | 35% | 8.6% | 3.1% | 0.9% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Aug 2026 | 50.7% | 33.9% | 10.1% | 3.7% | 1.1% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 52.1% | 35% | 8.6% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
How has the Apromore and IBM Process Mining comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Apromore was ahead of IBM Process Mining in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Apromore’s share of searches among process mining platforms worldwide moved from 2.5% to 1.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 2.9K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, IBM Process Mining’s share of searches among process mining platforms worldwide held steady at 0.15%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 480 to 320.
How did search popularity change for process mining platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, IBM Process Mining fell from 6th to 7th among process mining platforms worldwide.

Estimated monthly branded searches for Apromore worldwide fell 64.2% over 12 measured months, from 8.1K to 2.9K in September 2026.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Apromore’s and IBM Process Mining’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Apromore
1 branded search term
- apromore
IBM Process Mining
1 branded search term
- ibm process mining
Other head-to-heads among process mining platforms

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.