Anomali vs OpenCTI:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, Anomali had more branded searches than OpenCTI among threat intelligence platforms worldwide. Anomali had about 90,500 branded searches, while OpenCTI had 12,100. Anomali made up 30.3% of all threat intelligence platform searches we track, and OpenCTI accounted for 4.1%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow Anomali vs OpenCTI and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is Anomali or OpenCTI more popular in search?
Compare the threat intelligence platforms developers choose between. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for Anomali, OpenCTI. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Flashpoint | Anomali | Mandiant | MISP | Recorded Future | OpenCTI | Google Threat Intelligence | CrowdStrike | ThreatConnect | Group-IB Threat Intelligence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 44.2% | 36.3% | 4% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 0.97% | 0.35% | 1.2% | 0.07% |
| Nov 2025 | 43.2% | 35.4% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 0.42% | 0.63% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 44.1% | 36.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.96% | 0.35% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Jan 2026 | 44.1% | 36.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 0.96% | 0.43% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| Feb 2026 | 41.8% | 34.1% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.74% | 0.07% |
| Mar 2026 | 42.7% | 34.9% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 1.4% | 0.34% | 0.62% | 0.08% |
| Apr 2026 | 38.5% | 38.5% | 6.3% | 5.2% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| May 2026 | 46.8% | 31.2% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.2% | 1.5% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| Jun 2026 | 45.1% | 30.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4% | 1.5% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 0.07% |
| Jul 2026 | 45.6% | 30.6% | 5% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 0.34% | 0.54% | 0.09% |
| Aug 2026 | 51.2% | 28.1% | 5.6% | 4.6% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.31% | 0.4% | 0.08% |
| Sep 2026 | 45.2% | 30.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 1.2% | 0.44% | 0.44% | 0.11% |
How has the Anomali and OpenCTI comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Anomali was ahead of OpenCTI in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Anomali’s share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide moved from 36.3% to 30.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 165K to 90.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OpenCTI’s share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide moved from 3.3% to 4.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 12.1K.
How did search popularity change for threat intelligence platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Anomali gained share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, from 28.1% to 30.3%.
In September 2026, OpenCTI gained share of searches among threat intelligence platforms worldwide, from 3.1% to 4.1%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Anomali’s and OpenCTI’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among threat intelligence platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.