ABBYY vs Nanonets:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, ABBYY had more branded searches than Nanonets among AI document processing platforms worldwide. ABBYY had about 15,700 branded searches, while Nanonets had 9,900. ABBYY made up 16.5% of all AI document processing platform searches we track, and Nanonets accounted for 10.4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about AI document processing platforms, ABBYY appeared in three of the five answers and Nanonets in one. ABBYY was mentioned before Nanonets in every answer that named either.
Who do people search for more?
ABBYY, about 58% more searches than Nanonets
Who does AI mention more?
ABBYY, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Nanonets in 1
Who does AI recommend more?
ABBYY, named ahead of Nanonets in 3 of 3 answers
Follow ABBYY vs Nanonets and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top AI document processing platforms in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, ABBYY was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Nanonets was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. ABBYY was listed before Nanonets in every answer that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Azure AI Document Intelligence5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Google Document AI5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Amazon Textract4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers- ABBYY3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Rossum2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Nanonets1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Hyperscience1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Klippa0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Docsumo0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Affinda0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about AI document processing platforms
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which AI document processing platform should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best AI document processing platforms?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best AI document processing platform for reading documents?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“ai document processing”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“document processing software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is ABBYY or Nanonets more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for ABBYY and Nanonets by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all ten AI document processing platforms we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for ABBYY, Nanonets. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Rossum | ABBYY | Azure AI Document Intelligence | Google Document AI | Nanonets | Amazon Textract | Klippa | Hyperscience | Docsumo | Affinda |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 20.8% | 17.7% | 11.1% | 11.4% | 9.3% | 13.8% | 7.6% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 2.2% |
| Nov 2025 | 18.5% | 19.2% | 11.6% | 12.3% | 10.1% | 12.2% | 8.2% | 2.4% | 3% | 2.4% |
| Dec 2025 | 17% | 17.7% | 12.8% | 13.9% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 9.3% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 1.8% |
| Jan 2026 | 18.8% | 19.6% | 11.9% | 12.5% | 10.3% | 11.4% | 8.4% | 2% | 3.1% | 2% |
| Feb 2026 | 19.3% | 16.6% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 10.5% | 11.7% | 7% | 2.1% | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| Mar 2026 | 21.3% | 15% | 12.9% | 14.2% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 7.8% | 1.9% | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Apr 2026 | 22.7% | 16% | 13.5% | 12.4% | 10.1% | 11.3% | 6.8% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| May 2026 | 24.5% | 17.1% | 14.2% | 10.9% | 10.9% | 9.9% | 6% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| Jun 2026 | 24.8% | 17.5% | 14.2% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 9.3% | 6% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Jul 2026 | 30.3% | 17.5% | 11.4% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 8.2% | 4.9% | 1.7% | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Aug 2026 | 28.2% | 16.3% | 12.9% | 10.3% | 10.3% | 9.4% | 6.9% | 2% | 2% | 1.7% |
| Sep 2026 | 28.5% | 16.5% | 13% | 10.4% | 10.4% | 9.4% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 2% | 1.7% |
How has the ABBYY and Nanonets comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- ABBYY was ahead of Nanonets in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, ABBYY’s share of searches among AI document processing platforms worldwide moved from 17.7% to 16.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 23.1K to 15.7K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nanonets’ share of searches among AI document processing platforms worldwide moved from 9.3% to 10.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K.
How did search popularity change for AI document processing platforms worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
How are branded searches counted?
3 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using ABBYY’s and Nanonets’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among AI document processing platforms
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.