Himalayas vs We Work Remotely:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, We Work Remotely had more branded searches than Himalayas among remote job boards worldwide. We Work Remotely had about 320,000 branded searches, while Himalayas had 97,100. We Work Remotely made up 23.1% of all remote job board searches we track, and Himalayas accounted for 7%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow Himalayas vs We Work Remotely and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is Himalayas or We Work Remotely more popular in search?
Compare the job boards people use to find remote work. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for We Work Remotely, Himalayas. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Wellfound | We Work Remotely | FlexJobs | Remote OK | Himalayas | Remotive | Working Nomads | Remote.co | JustRemote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 18.1% | 23.1% | 29.1% | 8.8% | 1.4% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 4.2% | 0.96% |
| Nov 2025 | 19.9% | 22.2% | 26.2% | 11.7% | 1.1% | 7.9% | 6.4% | 3.7% | 0.86% |
| Dec 2025 | 23.1% | 24.2% | 24.9% | 11.1% | 1.1% | 6.1% | 5% | 3.6% | 0.82% |
| Jan 2026 | 21% | 26.8% | 22.6% | 10.2% | 1.4% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 4.8% | 0.91% |
| Feb 2026 | 25.2% | 24.8% | 22.2% | 9.9% | 1.2% | 5.5% | 6.7% | 3.9% | 0.73% |
| Mar 2026 | 28% | 24.5% | 20.6% | 9.2% | 1.2% | 5.1% | 6.2% | 4.4% | 0.83% |
| Apr 2026 | 27.5% | 25.7% | 16.2% | 8.8% | 1.4% | 4.9% | 6% | 9% | 0.53% |
| May 2026 | 28.4% | 26.7% | 16.7% | 9.2% | 1.8% | 6.2% | 6.2% | 4.3% | 0.55% |
| Jun 2026 | 31.6% | 25.5% | 15.2% | 8.3% | 2.3% | 5.6% | 6.9% | 4% | 0.61% |
| Jul 2026 | 33.4% | 25.6% | 16.1% | 8.8% | 2.2% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 3.5% | 0.65% |
| Aug 2026 | 34.5% | 25.8% | 16.2% | 7.2% | 3.1% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 2.9% | 0.53% |
| Sep 2026 | 31% | 23.1% | 17.8% | 8% | 7% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 0.59% |
How has the Himalayas and We Work Remotely comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- We Work Remotely was ahead of Himalayas in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Himalayas’ share of searches among remote job boards worldwide moved from 1.4% to 7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.7K to 97.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, We Work Remotely’s share of searches among remote job boards worldwide held steady at 23.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 239K to 320K.
How did search popularity change for remote job boards worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Himalayas overtook Remotive and Working Nomads to rank 5th among remote job boards worldwide, with 7% of the searches.

In September 2026, We Work Remotely lost share of searches among remote job boards worldwide, from 25.8% to 23.1%.
How are branded searches counted?
4 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Himalayas’ and We Work Remotely’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Himalayas
2 branded search terms
- himalayas app
- himalayas jobs
We Work Remotely
2 branded search terms
- we work remotely
- weworkremotely
Other head-to-heads among remote job boards

Wellfound vs We Work Remotely: compare search popularity
Wellfound vs FlexJobs: compare search popularity
Wellfound vs Remote OK: compare search popularity
Wellfound vs Himalayas: compare search popularity
We Work Remotely vs FlexJobs: compare search popularity
We Work Remotely vs Remote OK: compare search popularity

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.