3D Slicer vs Fujifilm:Which is searched more?
In September 2026, Fujifilm had more branded searches than 3D Slicer among medical imaging software worldwide. Fujifilm had about 823,000 branded searches, while 3D Slicer had 27,100. Fujifilm made up 69.5% of all medical imaging software searches we track, and 3D Slicer accounted for 2.3%. These are worldwide searches for English-language branded terms.
Follow 3D Slicer vs Fujifilm and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Is 3D Slicer or Fujifilm more popular in search?
Compare the software used to view medical images. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.
Share of searches by month for Fujifilm, 3D Slicer. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Fujifilm | GE HealthCare | Philips | 3D Slicer | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer | Sectra | Weasis | OsiriX MD | Agfa HealthCare | OHIF Viewer | Horos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 63.6% | 10.4% | 19% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.63% | 0.7% | 0.34% | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Nov 2025 | 62.3% | 8.3% | 22.8% | 2.1% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.61% | 0.57% | 0.27% | 0.22% | 0.14% |
| Dec 2025 | 67% | 7.4% | 20.2% | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.49% | 0.19% | 0.16% | 0.11% |
| Jan 2026 | 67.7% | 9.1% | 16.7% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 0.82% | 0.55% | 0.61% | 0.24% | 0.2% | 0.13% |
| Feb 2026 | 62.6% | 10.2% | 18.7% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 1.4% | 0.75% | 0.7% | 0.33% | 0.27% | 0.18% |
| Mar 2026 | 67.1% | 11% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 1.2% | 0.66% | 0.61% | 0.29% | 0.29% | 0.15% |
| Apr 2026 | 67.2% | 11% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 1.2% | 0.66% | 0.61% | 0.29% | 0.24% | 0.16% |
| May 2026 | 70.8% | 9.5% | 11.6% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 1% | 0.7% | 0.64% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.16% |
| Jun 2026 | 67.1% | 11% | 13.5% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 0.81% | 0.61% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.16% |
| Jul 2026 | 72.9% | 9.7% | 9.7% | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.1% | 0.72% | 0.53% | 0.32% | 0.26% | 0.14% |
| Aug 2026 | 70.8% | 9.5% | 11.6% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 1% | 0.85% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.14% |
| Sep 2026 | 69.5% | 11.4% | 11.4% | 2.3% | 2.1% | 1.2% | 0.84% | 0.52% | 0.3% | 0.24% | 0.16% |
How has the 3D Slicer and Fujifilm comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Fujifilm was ahead of 3D Slicer in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, 3D Slicer’s share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide moved from 2.1% to 2.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 27.1K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Fujifilm’s share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide moved from 63.6% to 69.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 823K.
How did search popularity change for medical imaging software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Fujifilm lost share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide, from 70.8% to 69.5%.
In September 2026, 3D Slicer rose from 5th to 4th among medical imaging software worldwide.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using 3D Slicer’s and Fujifilm’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among medical imaging software
Fujifilm vs GE HealthCare: compare search popularity
Fujifilm vs Philips: compare search popularity
Fujifilm vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: compare search popularity- GE HealthCare vs Philips: compare search popularity
- GE HealthCare vs 3D Slicer: compare search popularity
- GE HealthCare vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: compare search popularity
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.