Fusion 360 vs Tinkercad:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Tinkercad had more branded searches than Fusion 360 among 3D modelling software worldwide. Tinkercad had about 7.5 million branded searches, while Fusion 360 had 450,000. Tinkercad made up 66.8% of all 3D modelling software searches we track, and Fusion 360 accounted for 4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about 3D modelling software, Fusion 360 appeared in all five answers and Tinkercad in two. Fusion 360 was mentioned before Tinkercad in every answer.
Who do people search for more?
Tinkercad, about 17 searches for every 1 for Fusion 360
Who does AI mention more?
Fusion 360, mentioned in every answer we collected
Who does AI recommend more?
Fusion 360, named ahead of Tinkercad in every answer
Follow Fusion 360 vs Tinkercad and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top 3D modelling software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Fusion 360 appeared in all five answers. Tinkercad was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. Fusion 360 was listed before Tinkercad in every answer.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Fusion 3601st
Blender2nd
Autodesk Maya3rd
ZBrush4th
SketchUp5th
Shapr3D6th
Onshape7th
Plasticity8th
3ds Max9th
Tinkercad10th- +1 more
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Fusion 3605 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Blender5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
SketchUp4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Autodesk Maya4 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
3ds Max3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
ZBrush3 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Tinkercad2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Onshape2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Cinema 4D2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
Shapr3D2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about 3D modelling software
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which 3D modelling software should I use?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best 3D modelling software options?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What's the best 3D modelling software for a 3D model?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“3d modelling software”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“3d design software”
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in the United States on October 20, 2026.
Is Fusion 360 or Tinkercad more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for Fusion 360 and Tinkercad by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 11 3D modelling software we track, month by month, from English-language searches worldwide.
Share of searches by month for Tinkercad, Fusion 360. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Tinkercad | SketchUp | Onshape | Fusion 360 | Blender | 3ds Max | ZBrush | Cinema 4D | Shapr3D | Autodesk Maya | Plasticity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 68.4% | 13.7% | 9.1% | 4.1% | 1.2% | 0.82% | 1% | 0.55% | 0.55% | 0.45% | 0.05% |
| Nov 2025 | 65.2% | 15.9% | 8.7% | 4.8% | 1.4% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.79% | 0.53% | 0.06% |
| Dec 2025 | 63.9% | 15.7% | 8.6% | 5.7% | 1.7% | 0.94% | 1.1% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 0.52% | 0.07% |
| Jan 2026 | 59.6% | 17.8% | 9.7% | 6.5% | 2% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.72% | 0.88% | 0.59% | 0.06% |
| Feb 2026 | 65.4% | 16% | 8.7% | 4.8% | 1.4% | 0.79% | 0.96% | 0.53% | 0.79% | 0.43% | 0.06% |
| Mar 2026 | 64% | 15.6% | 10.4% | 4.7% | 1.4% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.63% | 0.77% | 0.52% | 0.06% |
| Apr 2026 | 65.4% | 16% | 8.7% | 4.8% | 1.4% | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.53% | 0.05% |
| May 2026 | 66.1% | 16.2% | 8.8% | 4% | 1.5% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.53% | 0.8% | 0.44% | 0.06% |
| Jun 2026 | 66.3% | 16.2% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 1.5% | 0.8% | 0.98% | 0.66% | 0.8% | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| Jul 2026 | 59.9% | 17.9% | 8.1% | 6.6% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.89% | 1.1% | 0.72% | 0.08% |
| Aug 2026 | 63.6% | 15.5% | 8.6% | 5.7% | 2.1% | 0.94% | 1.2% | 0.77% | 0.94% | 0.63% | 0.07% |
| Sep 2026 | 66.8% | 13.4% | 10.9% | 4% | 1.5% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.66% | 0.44% | 0.06% |
How has the Fusion 360 and Tinkercad comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Tinkercad was ahead of Fusion 360 in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Fusion 360’s share of searches among 3D modelling software worldwide moved from 4.1% to 4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 550K to 450K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Tinkercad’s share of searches among 3D modelling software worldwide moved from 68.4% to 66.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.1M to 7.5M.
How did search popularity change for 3D modelling software worldwide in September 2026?
2 changes

In September 2026, Tinkercad gained share of searches among 3D modelling software worldwide, from 63.6% to 66.8%.

In September 2026, Fusion 360 lost share of searches among 3D modelling software worldwide, from 5.7% to 4%.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Fusion 360’s and Tinkercad’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Fusion 360
1 branded search term
- fusion360
Tinkercad
1 branded search term
- tinkercad
Other head-to-heads among 3D modelling software

Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.