Brandwave

Viktoria & Woods vs Zimmermann:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Zimmermann had more branded searches than Viktoria & Woods among designer fashion labels in Australia. Zimmermann had about 40,500 branded searches, while Viktoria & Woods had 22,200. Zimmermann made up 6.6% of all designer fashion label searches we track, and Viktoria & Woods accounted for 3.6%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about designer fashion labels, Zimmermann appeared in three of the five answers and Viktoria & Woods in none.

Among designer fashion labels in Australia in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Zimmermann, about 82% more searches than Viktoria & Woods

Zimmermann 40.5K searchesViktoria & Woods 22.2K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Zimmermann, mentioned in 3 of 5 answers, Viktoria & Woods in 0

Zimmermann in 3 of 5Viktoria & Woods in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Zimmermann, the only one of the two named

Zimmermann first in 3Viktoria & Woods never named

Follow Viktoria & Woods vs Zimmermann and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top designer fashion labels in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Zimmermann was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Viktoria & Woods did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Aje1st
  2. Camilla and Marc2nd
  3. Christopher Esber3rd
  4. Camilla4th
  5. Zimmermann5th
  6. Rebecca Vallance6th
  7. Shona Joy7th
  8. Alémais8th
  9. St. Agni9th
  10. +3 more
  11. Viktoria & Woods–
  12. +2 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Aje5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Camilla and Marc3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Zimmermann3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Alémais3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • St. Agni3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Christopher Esber3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Camilla3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Shona Joy2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Rebecca Vallance2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Viktoria & Woods0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+5 more

See every answer about designer fashion labels

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.

Is Viktoria & Woods or Zimmermann more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Viktoria & Woods and Zimmermann by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 designer fashion labels we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.

Viktoria & Woods and Zimmermann among designer fashion labels in Australia, by month

Share of searches by month for Zimmermann, Viktoria & Woods. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthAjeBec + BridgeScanlan TheodoreCamilla and MarcShona JoyZimmermannAlémaisRebecca VallanceSir the LabelSt. AgniViktoria & WoodsFaithfull the BrandChristopher EsberSass & BideCamilla
Oct 202520.2%16.4%9%6.1%7.4%7.4%4.1%6.1%6.1%4.9%4.1%2.7%1.8%3.3%0.48%
Nov 202524.6%16.5%7.4%6%7.4%7.4%4%4%6%4.9%4%2.7%1.2%3.3%0.39%
Dec 202522.4%18.3%8.2%5.5%4.5%8.2%4.5%3.7%6.7%5.5%4.5%3.7%1.3%2.5%0.53%
Jan 202617.7%17.7%7.9%5.3%6.5%6.5%4.4%4.4%5.3%5.3%4.4%2.9%1.6%9.7%0.51%
Feb 202619.4%15.9%10.7%7.1%7.1%5.8%3.9%4.8%5.8%5.8%4.8%2.1%1.7%3.2%1.7%
Mar 202623%15.4%10.3%6.9%6.9%6.9%3.8%4.6%5.6%5.6%4.6%2.1%1.7%2.1%0.68%
Apr 202623.6%15.8%10.6%7.1%5.8%5.8%3.9%4.7%4.7%7.1%4.7%1.7%1.4%2.1%0.86%
May 202623.3%15.6%10.5%7%5.7%7%3.8%4.7%4.7%7%4.7%1.7%1.7%2.1%0.45%
Jun 202624.2%13.3%10.8%7.3%8.9%7.3%3.2%4.9%4.9%5.9%4%1.8%1.5%1.8%0.41%
Jul 202621.2%14.2%11.6%6.4%6.4%7.8%4.3%5.2%5.2%6.4%5.2%2.3%1.6%1.9%0.36%
Aug 202621.9%14.7%9.8%6.6%8%6.6%4.4%5.4%5.4%6.6%4.4%2.4%2%1.6%0.35%
Sep 202621.9%17.8%9.8%6.6%6.6%6.6%5.4%5.4%5.4%5.4%3.6%2.4%1.6%1.3%0.47%

How has the Viktoria & Woods and Zimmermann comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for Australia designer fashion labels in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Viktoria & Woods lost share of searches among designer fashion labels in Australia, from 4.4% to 3.6%.

  2. In September 2026, Zimmermann rose from 7th to 6th among designer fashion labels in Australia.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Viktoria & Woods’ and Zimmermann’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Viktoria & Woods

1 branded search term

  • viktoria and woods

Zimmermann

1 branded search term

  • zimmermann

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among designer fashion labels

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.