Brandwave

Sass & Bide vs Shona Joy:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Shona Joy had more branded searches than Sass & Bide among designer fashion labels in Australia. Shona Joy had about 40,500 branded searches, while Sass & Bide had 8,100. Shona Joy made up 6.6% of all designer fashion label searches we track, and Sass & Bide accounted for 1.3%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about designer fashion labels, Shona Joy appeared in two of the five answers and Sass & Bide in none.

Among designer fashion labels in Australia in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Shona Joy, about 5 searches for every 1 for Sass & Bide

Shona Joy 40.5K searchesSass & Bide 8.1K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Shona Joy, mentioned in 2 of 5 answers, Sass & Bide in 0

Shona Joy in 2 of 5Sass & Bide in 0 of 5

Who does AI recommend more?

Shona Joy, the only one of the two named

Shona Joy first in 2Sass & Bide never named

Follow Sass & Bide vs Shona Joy and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top designer fashion labels in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Shona Joy was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Sass & Bide did not appear in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Aje1st
  2. Camilla and Marc2nd
  3. Christopher Esber3rd
  4. Camilla4th
  5. Zimmermann5th
  6. Rebecca Vallance6th
  7. Shona Joy7th
  8. Alémais8th
  9. St. Agni9th
  10. +5 more
  11. Sass & Bide–

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Aje5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Camilla and Marc3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Zimmermann3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Alémais3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • St. Agni3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Christopher Esber3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Camilla3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Shona Joy2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Rebecca Vallance2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Sass & Bide0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+5 more

See every answer about designer fashion labels

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.

Is Sass & Bide or Shona Joy more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Sass & Bide and Shona Joy by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 designer fashion labels we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.

Sass & Bide and Shona Joy among designer fashion labels in Australia, by month

Share of searches by month for Shona Joy, Sass & Bide. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthAjeBec + BridgeScanlan TheodoreCamilla and MarcShona JoyZimmermannAlémaisRebecca VallanceSir the LabelSt. AgniViktoria & WoodsFaithfull the BrandChristopher EsberSass & BideCamilla
Oct 202520.2%16.4%9%6.1%7.4%7.4%4.1%6.1%6.1%4.9%4.1%2.7%1.8%3.3%0.48%
Nov 202524.6%16.5%7.4%6%7.4%7.4%4%4%6%4.9%4%2.7%1.2%3.3%0.39%
Dec 202522.4%18.3%8.2%5.5%4.5%8.2%4.5%3.7%6.7%5.5%4.5%3.7%1.3%2.5%0.53%
Jan 202617.7%17.7%7.9%5.3%6.5%6.5%4.4%4.4%5.3%5.3%4.4%2.9%1.6%9.7%0.51%
Feb 202619.4%15.9%10.7%7.1%7.1%5.8%3.9%4.8%5.8%5.8%4.8%2.1%1.7%3.2%1.7%
Mar 202623%15.4%10.3%6.9%6.9%6.9%3.8%4.6%5.6%5.6%4.6%2.1%1.7%2.1%0.68%
Apr 202623.6%15.8%10.6%7.1%5.8%5.8%3.9%4.7%4.7%7.1%4.7%1.7%1.4%2.1%0.86%
May 202623.3%15.6%10.5%7%5.7%7%3.8%4.7%4.7%7%4.7%1.7%1.7%2.1%0.45%
Jun 202624.2%13.3%10.8%7.3%8.9%7.3%3.2%4.9%4.9%5.9%4%1.8%1.5%1.8%0.41%
Jul 202621.2%14.2%11.6%6.4%6.4%7.8%4.3%5.2%5.2%6.4%5.2%2.3%1.6%1.9%0.36%
Aug 202621.9%14.7%9.8%6.6%8%6.6%4.4%5.4%5.4%6.6%4.4%2.4%2%1.6%0.35%
Sep 202621.9%17.8%9.8%6.6%6.6%6.6%5.4%5.4%5.4%5.4%3.6%2.4%1.6%1.3%0.47%

How has the Sass & Bide and Shona Joy comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings
  • The lead changed hands 2 times in the 12 months ending September 2026: Sass & Bide took it in January 2026, Shona Joy took it in February 2026.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Sass & Bide’s share of searches among designer fashion labels in Australia moved from 3.3% to 1.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 8.1K.
  • Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Shona Joy’s share of searches among designer fashion labels in Australia moved from 7.4% to 6.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 49.5K to 40.5K.

How did search popularity change for Australia designer fashion labels in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Shona Joy lost share of searches among designer fashion labels in Australia, from 8% to 6.6%.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Sass & Bide in Australia fell 63.5% over 12 measured months, from 22.2K to 8.1K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Sass & Bide’s and Shona Joy’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Sass & Bide

1 branded search term

  • sass and bide

Shona Joy

1 branded search term

  • shona joy

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among designer fashion labels

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.