O'Neill vs Volcom:Which is more popular?
In September 2026, Volcom had more branded searches than O'Neill among surf brands in Australia. Volcom had about 8,100 branded searches, while O'Neill had 5,400. Volcom made up 3% of all surf brand searches we track, and O'Neill accounted for 2%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about surf brands, O'Neill and Volcom each appeared in two of the five answers. O'Neill was mentioned before Volcom in two out of three answers that named either.
Who do people search for more?
Volcom, about 50% more searches than O'Neill
Who does AI mention more?
Both were mentioned in 2 of 5 answers.
Who does AI recommend more?
O'Neill, named ahead of Volcom in 2 of 3 answers
Follow O'Neill vs Volcom and get free monthly updates on what changed
By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy
Top surf brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews
In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, O'Neill was mentioned in two out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Volcom was mentioned in two out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in both Google AI Overviews. O'Neill was listed before Volcom in two out of three answers that named either.
Most recommended by AI
Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.
Mentioned by AI
Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.
Billabong5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Rip Curl5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Quiksilver4 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Ocean & Earth3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers- Volcom2 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
Rhythm2 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers- O'Neill2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Rusty2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Vissla2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
Afends1 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
See every answer about surf brands
5 answers
Asked ChatGPT
“Which surf brand should I buy from in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“What are the best surf brands in Australia?”
Asked ChatGPT
“Which boardshorts are best for surfing?”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“boardshorts”
Searched Google, AI Overview
“surf brands”
Not named in any answer:
Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.
Is O'Neill or Volcom more popular in search?
This chart shows how often people search Google for O'Neill and Volcom by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 surf brands we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.
Share of searches by month for Volcom, O'Neill. The figures are in the table below the chart.
View monthly share of searches table
| Month | Billabong | Rip Curl | Afends | Roxy | Deus Ex Machina | Volcom | Rhythm | Mambo | O'Neill | Quiksilver | Rusty | Ocean & Earth | Salty Crew | Vissla | The Critical Slide Society |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 23.4% | 28.6% | 15.7% | 8.6% | 5.7% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 2.6% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
| Nov 2025 | 21.9% | 26.6% | 21.9% | 8% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 0.87% | 1.1% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
| Dec 2025 | 24.4% | 29.7% | 13.3% | 7.3% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 4.9% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Jan 2026 | 24.2% | 29.6% | 16.2% | 7.3% | 4.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.95% | 0.79% | 0.62% |
| Feb 2026 | 23.7% | 23.7% | 19.4% | 7.1% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.91% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
| Mar 2026 | 20.7% | 25.3% | 20.7% | 6.2% | 7.6% | 3.4% | 3.4% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 1% | 1% | 0.67% | 0.54% |
| Apr 2026 | 21.7% | 26.6% | 17.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.83% | 0.57% |
| May 2026 | 24% | 24% | 16% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.77% | 0.63% |
| Jun 2026 | 21.1% | 21.1% | 25.8% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1% | 0.81% | 0.56% | 0.43% |
| Jul 2026 | 24.5% | 24.5% | 16.4% | 9% | 6% | 4% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 2.2% | 2.7% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.5% |
| Aug 2026 | 23.9% | 23.9% | 16% | 8.7% | 7.1% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.77% | 0.63% |
| Sep 2026 | 27.6% | 22.6% | 18.5% | 10.1% | 5.5% | 3% | 2.5% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.48% |
How has the O'Neill and Volcom comparison changed over the last 12 months?
3 findings
- Volcom was ahead of O'Neill in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, O'Neill’s share of searches among surf brands in Australia moved from 1.7% to 2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 5.4K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Volcom’s share of searches among surf brands in Australia moved from 3.8% to 3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 9.9K to 8.1K.
How did search popularity change for Australia surf brands in September 2026?
2 changes
In September 2026, Volcom lost share of searches among surf brands in Australia, from 3.9% to 3%.
In September 2026, O'Neill rose from 10th to 9th among surf brands in Australia.
How are branded searches counted?
2 search terms
Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using O'Neill’s and Volcom’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.
Other head-to-heads among surf brands
Put your own brand in this comparison
Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.