Brandwave

Faithfull the Brand vs Viktoria & Woods:Which is more popular?

In September 2026, Viktoria & Woods had more branded searches than Faithfull the Brand among designer fashion labels in Australia. Viktoria & Woods had about 22,200 branded searches, while Faithfull the Brand had 14,800. Viktoria & Woods made up 3.6% of all designer fashion label searches we track, and Faithfull the Brand accounted for 2.4%. When we asked ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews about designer fashion labels, neither Faithfull the Brand nor Viktoria & Woods appeared in any of the five answers.

Among designer fashion labels in Australia in September 2026

Who do people search for more?

Viktoria & Woods, about 50% more searches than Faithfull the Brand

Viktoria & Woods 22.2K searchesFaithfull the Brand 14.8K searches

Who does AI mention more?

Both were mentioned in 0 of 5 answers.

Faithfull the Brand in 0 of 5Viktoria & Woods in 0 of 5

Follow Faithfull the Brand vs Viktoria & Woods and get free monthly updates on what changed

By continuing you'll get index updates and occasional product news from Brandwave. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy

Track your brand against a rival →

Top designer fashion labels in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, neither Faithfull the Brand nor Viktoria & Woods showed up in any of the five answers.

Most recommended by AI

Brands get a higher ranking if they are mentioned earlier in the answers.

  1. Aje1st
  2. Camilla and Marc2nd
  3. Christopher Esber3rd
  4. Camilla4th
  5. Zimmermann5th
  6. Rebecca Vallance6th
  7. Shona Joy7th
  8. Alémais8th
  9. +4 more
  10. Viktoria & Woods–
  11. Faithfull the Brand–
  12. +1 more

Mentioned by AI

Each dot is one answer, filled in when that answer mentions the brand.

  • Aje5 of 5Named in 3 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 2 of 2 Google answers
  • Camilla and Marc3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Zimmermann3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Alémais3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • St. Agni3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Christopher Esber3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Camilla3 of 5Named in 2 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Shona Joy2 of 5Named in 1 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 1 of 2 Google answers
  • Viktoria & Woods0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers
  • Faithfull the Brand0 of 5Named in 0 of 3 ChatGPT answersNamed in 0 of 2 Google answers

+5 more

See every answer about designer fashion labels

5 answers

Brands are shown in the order each answer named them. The survey took place in Australia on October 26, 2026.

Is Faithfull the Brand or Viktoria & Woods more popular in search?

This chart shows how often people search Google for Faithfull the Brand and Viktoria & Woods by name. Each line represents a brand's share of searches for all 15 designer fashion labels we track, month by month, from searches in Australia.

Faithfull the Brand and Viktoria & Woods among designer fashion labels in Australia, by month

Share of searches by month for Viktoria & Woods, Faithfull the Brand. The figures are in the table below the chart.

View monthly share of searches table
MonthAjeBec + BridgeScanlan TheodoreCamilla and MarcShona JoyZimmermannAlémaisRebecca VallanceSir the LabelSt. AgniViktoria & WoodsFaithfull the BrandChristopher EsberSass & BideCamilla
Oct 202520.2%16.4%9%6.1%7.4%7.4%4.1%6.1%6.1%4.9%4.1%2.7%1.8%3.3%0.48%
Nov 202524.6%16.5%7.4%6%7.4%7.4%4%4%6%4.9%4%2.7%1.2%3.3%0.39%
Dec 202522.4%18.3%8.2%5.5%4.5%8.2%4.5%3.7%6.7%5.5%4.5%3.7%1.3%2.5%0.53%
Jan 202617.7%17.7%7.9%5.3%6.5%6.5%4.4%4.4%5.3%5.3%4.4%2.9%1.6%9.7%0.51%
Feb 202619.4%15.9%10.7%7.1%7.1%5.8%3.9%4.8%5.8%5.8%4.8%2.1%1.7%3.2%1.7%
Mar 202623%15.4%10.3%6.9%6.9%6.9%3.8%4.6%5.6%5.6%4.6%2.1%1.7%2.1%0.68%
Apr 202623.6%15.8%10.6%7.1%5.8%5.8%3.9%4.7%4.7%7.1%4.7%1.7%1.4%2.1%0.86%
May 202623.3%15.6%10.5%7%5.7%7%3.8%4.7%4.7%7%4.7%1.7%1.7%2.1%0.45%
Jun 202624.2%13.3%10.8%7.3%8.9%7.3%3.2%4.9%4.9%5.9%4%1.8%1.5%1.8%0.41%
Jul 202621.2%14.2%11.6%6.4%6.4%7.8%4.3%5.2%5.2%6.4%5.2%2.3%1.6%1.9%0.36%
Aug 202621.9%14.7%9.8%6.6%8%6.6%4.4%5.4%5.4%6.6%4.4%2.4%2%1.6%0.35%
Sep 202621.9%17.8%9.8%6.6%6.6%6.6%5.4%5.4%5.4%5.4%3.6%2.4%1.6%1.3%0.47%

How has the Faithfull the Brand and Viktoria & Woods comparison changed over the last 12 months?

3 findings

How did search popularity change for Australia designer fashion labels in September 2026?

2 changes
  1. In September 2026, Viktoria & Woods lost share of searches among designer fashion labels in Australia, from 4.4% to 3.6%.

  2. Estimated monthly branded searches for Faithfull the Brand in Australia fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 18.1K to 14.8K in September 2026.

How are branded searches counted?

2 search terms

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Faithfull the Brand’s and Viktoria & Woods’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

Faithfull the Brand

1 branded search term

  • faithfull the brand

Viktoria & Woods

1 branded search term

  • viktoria and woods

How the Brand Demand Index is measured

Other head-to-heads among designer fashion labels

Creator with pink hair and a pink jacket

Put your own brand in this comparison

Brandwave tracks your branded demand next to the rival you actually watch, with your campaigns, spend and outcomes on the same timeline.