--- title: "BIBS vs MAM: Which is searched more in New Zealand?" description: "Is BIBS or MAM more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Baby dummy brands set in New Zealand. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/nz/compare/bibs-vs-mam" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # BIBS vs MAM: Which is searched more in New Zealand? Is BIBS or MAM more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Baby dummy brands set in New Zealand. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: BIBS and MAM - **Competitive set**: Baby dummy brands - **Market**: New Zealand - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **BIBS Share of Search**: 5.9% - **MAM Share of Search**: 2.1% ## Is BIBS or MAM more popular in search? - In September 2026, BIBS had more branded searches than MAM among baby dummy brands in New Zealand. BIBS had about 480 branded searches, while MAM had 170. BIBS made up 5.9% of all baby dummy brand searches we track, and MAM accounted for 2.1%. - BIBS was ahead of MAM in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, BIBS’s share of searches among baby dummy brands in New Zealand moved from 4.1% to 5.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 260 to 480. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, MAM’s share of searches among baby dummy brands in New Zealand moved from 2.7% to 2.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 170. ## Top baby dummy brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, BIBS appeared in all five answers. MAM was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. BIBS was listed before MAM in four out of five answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Philips Avent | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | BIBS | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | MAM | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Tommee Tippee | 4th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Haakaa | 5th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | FRIGG | 6th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Pigeon | 7th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about baby dummy brands - Asked ChatGPT "Which baby dummy brand should I buy in New Zealand?": 1. BIBS, 2. Philips Avent, 3. MAM - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best baby dummy brands in New Zealand?": 1. BIBS, 2. MAM, 3. Philips Avent, 4. Pigeon, 5. FRIGG - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best baby dummy brand in New Zealand for soothing baby?": 1. Philips Avent, 2. MAM, 3. BIBS, 4. Tommee Tippee, 5. Haakaa - Searched Google, AI Overview "newborn dummy nz": 1. Philips Avent, 2. Haakaa, 3. BIBS, 4. Tommee Tippee - Searched Google, AI Overview "baby dummy brands nz": 1. Philips Avent, 2. Tommee Tippee, 3. BIBS, 4. FRIGG, 5. Haakaa Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in New Zealand on October 20, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for New Zealand baby dummy brands in September 2026? - In September 2026, FRIGG overtook MAM to rank 6th among baby dummy brands in New Zealand, with 2.6% of the searches. - In September 2026, BIBS overtook Philips Avent to rank 4th among baby dummy brands in New Zealand, with 5.9% of the searches. ## Month by month | Month | BIBS estimated searches | BIBS Share of Search | BIBS rank | MAM estimated searches | MAM Share of Search | MAM rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 260 | 4.1% | 5 | 170 | 2.7% | 7 | | Nov 2025 | 260 | 4.4% | 5 | 140 | 2.4% | 7 | | Dec 2025 | 260 | 4.9% | 5 | 140 | 2.6% | 7 | | Jan 2026 | 320 | 4.7% | 5 | 210 | 3.1% | 6 | | Feb 2026 | 320 | 5.4% | 5 | 210 | 3.5% | 6 | | Mar 2026 | 320 | 4.8% | 5 | 140 | 2.1% | 7 | | Apr 2026 | 260 | 4.1% | 5 | 170 | 2.7% | 6 | | May 2026 | 320 | 4.6% | 5 | 210 | 3% | 6 | | Jun 2026 | 320 | 4.3% | 5 | 170 | 2.3% | 7 | | Jul 2026 | 390 | 4.9% | 5 | 170 | 2.1% | 6 | | Aug 2026 | 390 | 4.7% | 5 | 210 | 2.5% | 6 | | Sep 2026 | 480 | 5.9% | 4 | 170 | 2.1% | 7 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using BIBS’s and MAM’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **BIBS**: Measured on the search term “bibs dummy”. - **MAM**: Measured on the search term “mam bottles”. - [BIBS profile](/demand/nz/brands/bibs) - [MAM profile](/demand/nz/brands/mam) - [All baby dummy brands in New Zealand](/demand/nz/categories/nz-baby-dummy-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is BIBS or MAM more popular in search? In September 2026, BIBS had more branded searches than MAM among baby dummy brands in New Zealand. BIBS had about 480 branded searches, while MAM had 170. BIBS made up 5.9% of all baby dummy brand searches we track, and MAM accounted for 2.1%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "BIBS vs MAM: Which is searched more in New Zealand?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/nz/compare/bibs-vs-mam This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/nz/compare/bibs-vs-mam. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.