--- title: "Touch Portal vs Ulanzi: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Touch Portal or Ulanzi more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Stream controllers set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/touch-portal-vs-ulanzi" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Touch Portal vs Ulanzi: Which is searched more? Is Touch Portal or Ulanzi more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Stream controllers set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Touch Portal and Ulanzi - **Competitive set**: Stream controllers - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Touch Portal Share of Search**: 9.1% - **Ulanzi Share of Search**: 0.81% ## Is Touch Portal or Ulanzi more popular in search? - In September 2026, Touch Portal had more branded searches than Ulanzi among stream controllers worldwide. Touch Portal had about 9,900 branded searches, while Ulanzi had 880. Touch Portal made up 9.1% of all stream controller searches we track, and Ulanzi accounted for 0.81%. - Touch Portal was ahead of Ulanzi in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Touch Portal’s share of searches among stream controllers worldwide moved from 10.4% to 9.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 9.9K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Ulanzi’s share of searches among stream controllers worldwide moved from 0.5% to 0.81%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 720 to 880. ## Top stream controllers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Touch Portal was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Ulanzi did not appear in any of the five answers. Too few answers listed options to rank the brands, so only mentions are counted. | Brand | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Elgato | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Loupedeck | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Touch Portal | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Logitech | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Mirabox | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Razer | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Ulanzi | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about stream controllers - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best stream deck for streaming?": 1. Elgato - Asked ChatGPT "What are good alternatives to the Elgato Stream Deck?": 1. Razer, 2. Touch Portal, 3. Loupedeck, 4. Logitech, 5. Elgato - Asked ChatGPT "Which stream controller should I buy?": 1. Elgato - Searched Google, AI Overview "stream controller": 1. Elgato, 2. Razer - Searched Google, AI Overview "stream deck alternative": named none of the brands we track Not named in any answer: Mirabox and Ulanzi. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 27, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for stream controllers worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, Touch Portal lost share of searches among stream controllers worldwide, from 10.9% to 9.1%. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Ulanzi worldwide rose 22.2% over 12 measured months, from 720 to 880 in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Touch Portal estimated searches | Touch Portal Share of Search | Touch Portal rank | Ulanzi estimated searches | Ulanzi Share of Search | Ulanzi rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 14.8K | 10.4% | 3 | 720 | 0.5% | 7 | | Nov 2025 | 14.8K | 10.2% | 3 | 720 | 0.5% | 7 | | Dec 2025 | 14.8K | 9.2% | 3 | 720 | 0.45% | 7 | | Jan 2026 | 18.1K | 10.8% | 3 | 720 | 0.43% | 7 | | Feb 2026 | 14.8K | 12.4% | 3 | 590 | 0.5% | 7 | | Mar 2026 | 14.8K | 10.9% | 3 | 720 | 0.53% | 7 | | Apr 2026 | 14.8K | 12.9% | 3 | 880 | 0.77% | 7 | | May 2026 | 12.1K | 10.7% | 3 | 880 | 0.78% | 7 | | Jun 2026 | 9.9K | 8.8% | 3 | 880 | 0.78% | 7 | | Jul 2026 | 12.1K | 11% | 3 | 880 | 0.8% | 7 | | Aug 2026 | 12.1K | 10.9% | 3 | 880 | 0.8% | 7 | | Sep 2026 | 9.9K | 9.1% | 3 | 880 | 0.81% | 7 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Touch Portal’s and Ulanzi’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Touch Portal**: Measured on the search term “touch portal”. - **Ulanzi**: Measured on the search term “ulanzi stream deck”. - [Touch Portal profile](/demand/global-en/brands/touch-portal) - [Ulanzi profile](/demand/global-en/brands/ulanzi) - [All stream controllers worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/stream-controllers): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Touch Portal or Ulanzi more popular in search? In September 2026, Touch Portal had more branded searches than Ulanzi among stream controllers worldwide. Touch Portal had about 9,900 branded searches, while Ulanzi had 880. Touch Portal made up 9.1% of all stream controller searches we track, and Ulanzi accounted for 0.81%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Touch Portal vs Ulanzi: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/touch-portal-vs-ulanzi This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/touch-portal-vs-ulanzi. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.