--- title: "TeamSnap vs Wild Apricot: Which is searched more?" description: "Is TeamSnap or Wild Apricot more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Club management software set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/teamsnap-vs-wild-apricot" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # TeamSnap vs Wild Apricot: Which is searched more? Is TeamSnap or Wild Apricot more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Club management software set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: TeamSnap and Wild Apricot - **Competitive set**: Club management software - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **TeamSnap Share of Search**: 84.9% - **Wild Apricot Share of Search**: 4.2% ## Is TeamSnap or Wild Apricot more popular in search? - In September 2026, TeamSnap had more branded searches than Wild Apricot among club management software worldwide. TeamSnap had about 201,000 branded searches, while Wild Apricot had 9,900. TeamSnap made up 84.9% of all club management software searches we track, and Wild Apricot accounted for 4.2%. - TeamSnap was ahead of Wild Apricot in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TeamSnap’s share of searches among club management software worldwide moved from 83.8% to 84.9%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 201K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Wild Apricot’s share of searches among club management software worldwide moved from 5% to 4.2%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 12.1K to 9.9K. ## Top club management software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Wild Apricot was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. TeamSnap was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Wild Apricot was listed before TeamSnap in every answer that named either. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Wild Apricot | 1st | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | ClubExpress | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Clubessential | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Jonas Club Software | 4th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | TeamSnap | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | MemberClicks | 6th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | ClubSpark | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Perfect Gym | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Jonas Fitness | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about club management software - Asked ChatGPT "Which club management software should I use?": 1. Wild Apricot, 2. ClubExpress, 3. TeamSnap - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best club management software options?": 1. Wild Apricot, 2. ClubExpress, 3. Jonas Club Software, 4. TeamSnap, 5. MemberClicks, 6. Clubessential - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best club management software for club operations?": 1. Clubessential, 2. Jonas Club Software - Searched Google, AI Overview "club management software": 1. Jonas Club Software - Searched Google, AI Overview "membership management software": 1. Wild Apricot Not named in any answer: ClubSpark, Perfect Gym and Jonas Fitness. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 20, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for club management software worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for Wild Apricot worldwide fell 18.2% over 12 measured months, from 12.1K to 9.9K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | TeamSnap estimated searches | TeamSnap Share of Search | TeamSnap rank | Wild Apricot estimated searches | Wild Apricot Share of Search | Wild Apricot rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 201K | 83.8% | 1 | 12.1K | 5% | 2 | | Nov 2025 | 201K | 85.5% | 1 | 12.1K | 5.1% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | 135K | 82% | 1 | 9.9K | 6% | 2 | | Jan 2026 | 165K | 80.1% | 1 | 14.8K | 7.2% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | 165K | 81.3% | 1 | 12.1K | 6% | 2 | | Mar 2026 | 201K | 82.7% | 1 | 12.1K | 5% | 3 | | Apr 2026 | 165K | 79.7% | 1 | 9.9K | 4.8% | 4 | | May 2026 | 165K | 80.7% | 1 | 9.9K | 4.8% | 4 | | Jun 2026 | 135K | 78.5% | 1 | 9.9K | 5.8% | 4 | | Jul 2026 | 110K | 74.2% | 1 | 9.9K | 6.7% | 4 | | Aug 2026 | 201K | 84.8% | 1 | 9.9K | 4.2% | 4 | | Sep 2026 | 201K | 84.9% | 1 | 9.9K | 4.2% | 4 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using TeamSnap’s and Wild Apricot’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **TeamSnap**: Measured on the search term “teamsnap”. - **Wild Apricot**: Measured on the search term “wild apricot”. - [TeamSnap profile](/demand/global-en/brands/teamsnap) - [Wild Apricot profile](/demand/global-en/brands/wild-apricot) - [All club management software worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/club-management-software): The set both shares are measured inside, 9 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is TeamSnap or Wild Apricot more popular in search? In September 2026, TeamSnap had more branded searches than Wild Apricot among club management software worldwide. TeamSnap had about 201,000 branded searches, while Wild Apricot had 9,900. TeamSnap made up 84.9% of all club management software searches we track, and Wild Apricot accounted for 4.2%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "TeamSnap vs Wild Apricot: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/teamsnap-vs-wild-apricot This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/teamsnap-vs-wild-apricot. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.