--- title: "Redis Streams vs ZeroMQ: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Redis Streams or ZeroMQ more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Message queue services set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/redis-streams-vs-zeromq" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Redis Streams vs ZeroMQ: Which is searched more? Is Redis Streams or ZeroMQ more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Message queue services set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Redis Streams and ZeroMQ - **Competitive set**: Message queue services - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Redis Streams Share of Search**: 4.3% - **ZeroMQ Share of Search**: 6.4% ## Is Redis Streams or ZeroMQ more popular in search? - In September 2026, ZeroMQ had more branded searches than Redis Streams among message queue services worldwide. ZeroMQ had about 8,100 branded searches, while Redis Streams had 5,400. ZeroMQ made up 6.4% of all message queue service searches we track, and Redis Streams accounted for 4.3%. - ZeroMQ was ahead of Redis Streams in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Redis Streams’ share of searches among message queue services worldwide moved from 3.7% to 4.3%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 5.4K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, ZeroMQ’s share of searches among message queue services worldwide moved from 6.8% to 6.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 8.1K. ## Top message queue services in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, neither Redis Streams nor ZeroMQ showed up in any of the five answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | RabbitMQ | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Amazon SQS | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Kafka | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Azure Service Bus | 4th | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Google Cloud Pub/Sub | 5th | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | NATS | 6th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | ActiveMQ | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | ZeroMQ | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Redis Streams | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Google Pub/Sub | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about message queue services - Asked ChatGPT "Which message queue service should I use?": 1. Amazon SQS, 2. RabbitMQ, 3. Google Cloud Pub/Sub, 4. Azure Service Bus, 5. Kafka - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best message queue services?": 1. Amazon SQS, 2. RabbitMQ, 3. Kafka, 4. Google Cloud Pub/Sub, 5. Azure Service Bus, 6. NATS - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best message queue service for service-to-service messaging?": 1. Amazon SQS, 2. RabbitMQ, 3. NATS, 4. Kafka, 5. Azure Service Bus, 6. Google Cloud Pub/Sub - Searched Google, AI Overview "message queue services": 1. Kafka, 2. Azure Service Bus, 3. RabbitMQ - Searched Google, AI Overview "message broker service": 1. RabbitMQ, 2. Kafka, 3. Amazon SQS, 4. Google Cloud Pub/Sub, 5. NATS Not named in any answer: ActiveMQ, ZeroMQ, Redis Streams and Google Pub/Sub. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for message queue services worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for ZeroMQ worldwide fell 45.3% over 12 measured months, from 14.8K to 8.1K in September 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Redis Streams worldwide fell 33.3% over 12 measured months, from 8.1K to 5.4K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Redis Streams estimated searches | Redis Streams Share of Search | Redis Streams rank | ZeroMQ estimated searches | ZeroMQ Share of Search | ZeroMQ rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 8.1K | 3.7% | 7 | 14.8K | 6.8% | 4 | | Nov 2025 | 8.1K | 4.4% | 7 | 14.8K | 8% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | 6.6K | 3.8% | 7 | 12.1K | 7% | 3 | | Jan 2026 | 8.1K | 4.5% | 7 | 14.8K | 8.2% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | 6.6K | 3.7% | 7 | 12.1K | 6.8% | 3 | | Mar 2026 | 8.1K | 4.3% | 7 | 14.8K | 7.8% | 3 | | Apr 2026 | 6.6K | 3.9% | 7 | 12.1K | 7.1% | 5 | | May 2026 | 6.6K | 4.2% | 7 | 12.1K | 7.7% | 3 | | Jun 2026 | 5.4K | 3.6% | 7 | 9.9K | 6.6% | 5 | | Jul 2026 | 5.4K | 3.7% | 7 | 9.9K | 6.7% | 4 | | Aug 2026 | 5.4K | 4.3% | 7 | 8.1K | 6.4% | 6 | | Sep 2026 | 5.4K | 4.3% | 7 | 8.1K | 6.4% | 6 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Redis Streams’ and ZeroMQ’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Redis Streams**: Measured on the search term “redis streams”. - **ZeroMQ**: Measured on the search term “zeromq”. - [Redis Streams profile](/demand/global-en/brands/redis-streams) - [ZeroMQ profile](/demand/global-en/brands/zeromq) - [All message queue services worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/message-queue-services): The set both shares are measured inside, 10 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Redis Streams or ZeroMQ more popular in search? In September 2026, ZeroMQ had more branded searches than Redis Streams among message queue services worldwide. ZeroMQ had about 8,100 branded searches, while Redis Streams had 5,400. ZeroMQ made up 6.4% of all message queue service searches we track, and Redis Streams accounted for 4.3%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Redis Streams vs ZeroMQ: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/redis-streams-vs-zeromq This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/redis-streams-vs-zeromq. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.