--- title: "Philips vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Medical imaging software set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/philips-vs-radiant-dicom" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Philips vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: Which is searched more? Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Medical imaging software set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Philips and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer - **Competitive set**: Medical imaging software - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Philips Share of Search**: 11.4% - **RadiAnt DICOM Viewer Share of Search**: 2.1% ## Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? - In September 2026, Philips had more branded searches than RadiAnt DICOM Viewer among medical imaging software worldwide. Philips had about 135,000 branded searches, while RadiAnt DICOM Viewer had 25,100. Philips made up 11.4% of all medical imaging software searches we track, and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer accounted for 2.1%. - Philips was ahead of RadiAnt DICOM Viewer in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Philips’ share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide moved from 19% to 11.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 246K to 135K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, RadiAnt DICOM Viewer’s share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide moved from 1.7% to 2.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.5K to 25.1K. ## Top medical imaging software in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, RadiAnt DICOM Viewer was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Philips was mentioned in one out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer was listed before Philips in every answer that named either. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Weasis | 1st | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | 3D Slicer | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Horos | 4th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | OsiriX MD | 5th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | OHIF Viewer | 6th | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Sectra | 7th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Philips | 8th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | GE HealthCare | 9th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 | | Fujifilm | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Agfa HealthCare | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about medical imaging software - Asked ChatGPT "Which medical imaging software should I use?": 1. 3D Slicer, 2. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer, 3. OHIF Viewer - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best medical imaging software options?": 1. Weasis, 2. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer, 3. 3D Slicer, 4. OHIF Viewer, 5. OsiriX MD, 6. Sectra, 7. Philips, 8. GE HealthCare - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best medical imaging software for medical image viewing?": 1. Weasis, 2. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer, 3. 3D Slicer, 4. Horos, 5. OHIF Viewer - Searched Google, AI Overview "dicom viewer software": 1. Weasis, 2. Horos, 3. 3D Slicer, 4. RadiAnt DICOM Viewer, 5. OsiriX MD - Searched Google, AI Overview "medical imaging software": 1. OsiriX MD, 2. Horos Not named in any answer: Fujifilm and Agfa HealthCare. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for medical imaging software worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, GE HealthCare overtook Philips to rank 2nd among medical imaging software worldwide, with 11.4% of the searches. - In September 2026, RadiAnt DICOM Viewer lost share of searches among medical imaging software worldwide, from 2.6% to 2.1%. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Philips worldwide fell 45.1% over 12 measured months, from 246K to 135K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Philips estimated searches | Philips Share of Search | Philips rank | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer estimated searches | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer Share of Search | RadiAnt DICOM Viewer rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 246K | 19% | 2 | 22.5K | 1.7% | 5 | | Nov 2025 | 301K | 22.8% | 2 | 21.7K | 1.6% | 5 | | Dec 2025 | 301K | 20.2% | 2 | 21.7K | 1.5% | 5 | | Jan 2026 | 246K | 16.7% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.1% | 4 | | Feb 2026 | 201K | 18.7% | 2 | 25.8K | 2.4% | 5 | | Mar 2026 | 165K | 13.5% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.5% | 5 | | Apr 2026 | 165K | 13.5% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.5% | 5 | | May 2026 | 135K | 11.6% | 2 | 25.8K | 2.2% | 5 | | Jun 2026 | 135K | 13.5% | 2 | 21K | 2.1% | 5 | | Jul 2026 | 110K | 9.7% | 3 | 25.1K | 2.2% | 5 | | Aug 2026 | 135K | 11.6% | 2 | 30.7K | 2.6% | 4 | | Sep 2026 | 135K | 11.4% | 3 | 25.1K | 2.1% | 5 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Philips’ and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Philips**: Measured on the search term “philips airfryer”. - **RadiAnt DICOM Viewer**: Measured on the search terms “radiant dicom viewer” and “radiant viewer”, summed into one figure. - [Philips profile](/demand/global-en/brands/philips) - [RadiAnt DICOM Viewer profile](/demand/global-en/brands/radiant-dicom) - [All medical imaging software worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/medical-imaging-software): The set both shares are measured inside, 11 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Philips or RadiAnt DICOM Viewer more popular in search? In September 2026, Philips had more branded searches than RadiAnt DICOM Viewer among medical imaging software worldwide. Philips had about 135,000 branded searches, while RadiAnt DICOM Viewer had 25,100. Philips made up 11.4% of all medical imaging software searches we track, and RadiAnt DICOM Viewer accounted for 2.1%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Philips vs RadiAnt DICOM Viewer: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/philips-vs-radiant-dicom This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/philips-vs-radiant-dicom. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.