--- title: "O-Cedar vs Rubbermaid: Which is searched more?" description: "Is O-Cedar or Rubbermaid more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Mop brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/o-cedar-vs-rubbermaid" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # O-Cedar vs Rubbermaid: Which is searched more? Is O-Cedar or Rubbermaid more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Mop brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: O-Cedar and Rubbermaid - **Competitive set**: Mop brands - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **O-Cedar Share of Search**: 1.8% - **Rubbermaid Share of Search**: 0.35% ## Is O-Cedar or Rubbermaid more popular in search? - In September 2026, O-Cedar had more branded searches than Rubbermaid among mop brands worldwide. O-Cedar had about 18,100 branded searches, while Rubbermaid had 3,600. O-Cedar made up 1.8% of all mop brand searches we track, and Rubbermaid accounted for 0.35%. - O-Cedar was ahead of Rubbermaid in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, O-Cedar’s share of searches among mop brands worldwide moved from 2.2% to 1.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 18.1K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Rubbermaid’s share of searches among mop brands worldwide held steady at 0.35%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 3.6K. ## Top mop brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, O-Cedar appeared in all five answers. Rubbermaid was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. O-Cedar was listed before Rubbermaid in every answer. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | O-Cedar | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Bona | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Rubbermaid | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | BISSELL | 4th | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Swiffer | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Vileda | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Leifheit | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | Beldray | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about mop brands - Asked ChatGPT "Which mop brand should I buy?": 1. O-Cedar, 2. Bona, 3. Rubbermaid - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best mop brands?": 1. O-Cedar, 2. Rubbermaid, 3. Bona, 4. BISSELL - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best mop brand for floor cleaning?": 1. O-Cedar, 2. Bona, 3. Rubbermaid, 4. BISSELL - Searched Google, AI Overview "best mop": 1. O-Cedar, 2. BISSELL, 3. Rubbermaid - Searched Google, AI Overview "best floor mop": 1. O-Cedar, 2. Bona, 3. BISSELL Not named in any answer: Swiffer, Vileda, Leifheit and Beldray. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for mop brands worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for O-Cedar worldwide fell 18.5% over 12 measured months, from 22.2K to 18.1K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | O-Cedar estimated searches | O-Cedar Share of Search | O-Cedar rank | Rubbermaid estimated searches | Rubbermaid Share of Search | Rubbermaid rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 22.2K | 2.2% | 5 | 3.6K | 0.35% | 8 | | Nov 2025 | 22.2K | 2% | 5 | 2.9K | 0.26% | 8 | | Dec 2025 | 18.1K | 2% | 6 | 2.9K | 0.32% | 8 | | Jan 2026 | 18.1K | 1.9% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.37% | 8 | | Feb 2026 | 18.1K | 2% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.39% | 8 | | Mar 2026 | 18.1K | 1.8% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.36% | 8 | | Apr 2026 | 18.1K | 2.1% | 6 | 2.9K | 0.33% | 8 | | May 2026 | 18.1K | 2.2% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.44% | 8 | | Jun 2026 | 14.8K | 1.9% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.45% | 8 | | Jul 2026 | 18.1K | 2.3% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.45% | 8 | | Aug 2026 | 18.1K | 1.9% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.37% | 8 | | Sep 2026 | 18.1K | 1.8% | 6 | 3.6K | 0.35% | 8 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using O-Cedar’s and Rubbermaid’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **O-Cedar**: Measured on the search terms “o cedar” and “o-cedar”, summed into one figure. - **Rubbermaid**: Measured on the search term “rubbermaid mop”. - [O-Cedar profile](/demand/global-en/brands/o-cedar) - [Rubbermaid profile](/demand/global-en/brands/rubbermaid) - [All mop brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/mop-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 8 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is O-Cedar or Rubbermaid more popular in search? In September 2026, O-Cedar had more branded searches than Rubbermaid among mop brands worldwide. O-Cedar had about 18,100 branded searches, while Rubbermaid had 3,600. O-Cedar made up 1.8% of all mop brand searches we track, and Rubbermaid accounted for 0.35%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "O-Cedar vs Rubbermaid: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/o-cedar-vs-rubbermaid This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/o-cedar-vs-rubbermaid. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.