---
title: "Nittaku vs Tibhar: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Nittaku or Tibhar more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Table tennis brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/nittaku-vs-tibhar"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Nittaku vs Tibhar: Which is searched more?

Is Nittaku or Tibhar more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Table tennis brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Nittaku and Tibhar
- **Competitive set**: Table tennis brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Nittaku Share of Search**: 0.14%
- **Tibhar Share of Search**: 1.5%

## Is Nittaku or Tibhar more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Tibhar had more branded searches than Nittaku among table tennis brands worldwide. Tibhar had about 9,900 branded searches, while Nittaku had 880. Tibhar made up 1.5% of all table tennis brand searches we track, and Nittaku accounted for 0.14%.
- Tibhar was ahead of Nittaku in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nittaku’s share of searches among table tennis brands worldwide held steady at 0.14%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 880.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Tibhar’s share of searches among table tennis brands worldwide moved from 2.3% to 1.5%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 9.9K.

## Top table tennis brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Nittaku and Tibhar were each mentioned in four out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Tibhar was listed before Nittaku in three out of four answers that named either.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Butterfly | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| Stiga | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| DHS | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| JOOLA | 4th | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Tibhar | 5th | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Yasaka | 6th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| Nittaku | 7th | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Cornilleau | 8th | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 |

## Every AI answer about table tennis brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which table tennis brand should I buy?": 1. Stiga, 2. Butterfly, 3. DHS, 4. Cornilleau
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best table tennis brands?": 1. Butterfly, 2. DHS, 3. Stiga, 4. Yasaka, 5. Tibhar, 6. JOOLA, 7. Nittaku, 8. Cornilleau
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best table tennis brand for competitive play?": 1. Butterfly, 2. DHS, 3. JOOLA, 4. Stiga, 5. Nittaku, 6. Tibhar
- Searched Google, AI Overview "table tennis brands": 1. Butterfly, 2. Stiga, 3. DHS, 4. JOOLA, 5. Tibhar, 6. Yasaka, 7. Nittaku, 8. Cornilleau
- Searched Google, AI Overview "table tennis racket brands": 1. Butterfly, 2. Stiga, 3. JOOLA, 4. Yasaka, 5. Tibhar, 6. Nittaku, 7. DHS

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for table tennis brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Tibhar lost share of searches among table tennis brands worldwide, from 2.3% to 1.5%.

## Month by month

| Month | Nittaku estimated searches | Nittaku Share of Search | Nittaku rank | Tibhar estimated searches | Tibhar Share of Search | Tibhar rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 880 | 0.14% | 7 | 14.8K | 2.3% | 3 |
| Nov 2025 | 880 | 0.16% | 7 | 14.8K | 2.7% | 3 |
| Dec 2025 | 880 | 0.16% | 7 | 12.1K | 2.2% | 4 |
| Jan 2026 | 880 | 0.09% | 7 | 12.1K | 1.3% | 4 |
| Feb 2026 | 720 | 0.08% | 7 | 12.1K | 1.3% | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | 720 | 0.08% | 7 | 12.1K | 1.3% | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | 720 | 0.1% | 7 | 12.1K | 1.8% | 4 |
| May 2026 | 720 | 0.12% | 7 | 14.8K | 2.4% | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | 720 | 0.12% | 7 | 9.9K | 1.7% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | 720 | 0.13% | 7 | 9.9K | 1.8% | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | 880 | 0.16% | 7 | 12.1K | 2.3% | 4 |
| Sep 2026 | 880 | 0.14% | 7 | 9.9K | 1.5% | 5 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Nittaku’s and Tibhar’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Nittaku**: Measured on the search term “nittaku table tennis”.
- **Tibhar**: Measured on the search term “tibhar”.

- [Nittaku profile](/demand/global-en/brands/nittaku)
- [Tibhar profile](/demand/global-en/brands/tibhar)
- [All table tennis brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/table-tennis-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 8 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Nittaku or Tibhar more popular in search?

In September 2026, Tibhar had more branded searches than Nittaku among table tennis brands worldwide. Tibhar had about 9,900 branded searches, while Nittaku had 880. Tibhar made up 1.5% of all table tennis brand searches we track, and Nittaku accounted for 0.14%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Nittaku vs Tibhar: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/nittaku-vs-tibhar

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/nittaku-vs-tibhar. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
