---
title: "NetNut vs Oxylabs: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is NetNut or Oxylabs more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Proxy providers set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/netnut-vs-oxylabs"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# NetNut vs Oxylabs: Which is searched more?

Is NetNut or Oxylabs more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Proxy providers set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: NetNut and Oxylabs
- **Competitive set**: Proxy providers
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **NetNut Share of Search**: 0.66%
- **Oxylabs Share of Search**: 6.1%

## Is NetNut or Oxylabs more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Oxylabs had more branded searches than NetNut among proxy providers worldwide. Oxylabs had about 33,100 branded searches, while NetNut had 3,600. Oxylabs made up 6.1% of all proxy provider searches we track, and NetNut accounted for 0.66%.
- Oxylabs was ahead of NetNut in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, NetNut’s share of searches among proxy providers worldwide moved from 1.2% to 0.66%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 6.6K to 3.6K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Oxylabs’ share of searches among proxy providers worldwide moved from 9% to 6.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 49.5K to 33.1K.

## Top proxy providers in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Oxylabs was mentioned in four out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. NetNut did not appear in any of the five answers.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Decodo | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| Bright Data | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| Oxylabs | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Webshare | 4th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| SOAX | 5th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 |
| IPRoyal | 6th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 |
| DataImpulse | 7th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 1 of 5 |
| NetNut | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 |

## Every AI answer about proxy providers

- Asked ChatGPT "Which proxy provider should I use?": 1. Decodo, 2. Oxylabs, 3. Webshare, 4. Bright Data
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best residential proxy providers?": 1. Decodo, 2. Bright Data, 3. Oxylabs, 4. SOAX, 5. IPRoyal, 6. DataImpulse
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best proxy service for web scraping?": 1. Decodo, 2. Bright Data, 3. Webshare, 4. Oxylabs
- Searched Google, AI Overview "residential proxies": 1. Decodo, 2. Bright Data, 3. Oxylabs
- Searched Google, AI Overview "proxy service": 1. Decodo, 2. Bright Data

Not named in any answer: NetNut.

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 22, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for proxy providers worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Oxylabs lost share of searches among proxy providers worldwide, from 6.7% to 6.1%.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for NetNut worldwide fell 45.5% over 12 measured months, from 6.6K to 3.6K in September 2026.

## Month by month

| Month | NetNut estimated searches | NetNut Share of Search | NetNut rank | Oxylabs estimated searches | Oxylabs Share of Search | Oxylabs rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 6.6K | 1.2% | 8 | 49.5K | 9% | 5 |
| Nov 2025 | 6.6K | 1.3% | 8 | 40.5K | 8.2% | 6 |
| Dec 2025 | 6.6K | 1.3% | 8 | 40.5K | 7.7% | 6 |
| Jan 2026 | 6.6K | 1.1% | 8 | 49.5K | 8.5% | 6 |
| Feb 2026 | 6.6K | 1.1% | 8 | 49.5K | 8.4% | 6 |
| Mar 2026 | 8.1K | 1.2% | 8 | 60.5K | 9.1% | 6 |
| Apr 2026 | 8.1K | 1.2% | 8 | 60.5K | 9.2% | 6 |
| May 2026 | 6.6K | 1.1% | 8 | 49.5K | 7.9% | 6 |
| Jun 2026 | 6.6K | 1.1% | 8 | 49.5K | 8% | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | 27.1K | 4% | 7 | 60.5K | 9% | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | 5.4K | 0.89% | 8 | 40.5K | 6.7% | 6 |
| Sep 2026 | 3.6K | 0.66% | 8 | 33.1K | 6.1% | 6 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using NetNut’s and Oxylabs’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **NetNut**: Measured on the search term “netnut”.
- **Oxylabs**: Measured on the search term “oxylabs”.

- [NetNut profile](/demand/global-en/brands/netnut)
- [Oxylabs profile](/demand/global-en/brands/oxylabs)
- [All proxy providers worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/proxy-providers): The set both shares are measured inside, 8 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is NetNut or Oxylabs more popular in search?

In September 2026, Oxylabs had more branded searches than NetNut among proxy providers worldwide. Oxylabs had about 33,100 branded searches, while NetNut had 3,600. Oxylabs made up 6.1% of all proxy provider searches we track, and NetNut accounted for 0.66%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "NetNut vs Oxylabs: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/netnut-vs-oxylabs

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/netnut-vs-oxylabs. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
