---
title: "Neo4j vs TigerGraph: Which is more popular by branded search?"
description: "Which is more popular in search, Neo4j or TigerGraph? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Graph databases set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/neo4j-vs-tigergraph"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Neo4j vs TigerGraph: Which is more popular by branded search?

Which is more popular in search, Neo4j or TigerGraph? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Graph databases set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Neo4j and TigerGraph
- **Competitive set**: Graph databases
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Aug 2026
- **Neo4j Share of Search**: 84.7%
- **TigerGraph Share of Search**: 2.7%

## Which is more popular in search, Neo4j or TigerGraph?

- In August 2026, Neo4j had more branded searches than TigerGraph among graph databases worldwide. Neo4j was estimated to have 90.5K branded searches compared to TigerGraph’s 2.9K, and held an 84.7% Share of Search versus TigerGraph’s 2.7%.
- Neo4j was ahead of TigerGraph in every measured month of the 11 months ending August 2026.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, Neo4j’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide moved from 82.5% to 84.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 110K to 90.5K.
- Across the 11 months ending August 2026, TigerGraph’s estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide moved from 3.3% to 2.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 4.4K to 2.9K.

## How did search popularity change for graph databases worldwide in August 2026?

- In August 2026, Neo4j gained estimated Share of Search among graph databases worldwide, from 83.3% to 84.7%.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for TigerGraph worldwide fell 34.1% over 11 measured months, from 4.4K to 2.9K in August 2026.

## Month by month

| Month | Neo4j estimated searches | Neo4j Share of Search | Neo4j rank | TigerGraph estimated searches | TigerGraph Share of Search | TigerGraph rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 110K | 82.5% | 1 | 4.4K | 3.3% | 5 |
| Nov 2025 | 110K | 81.9% | 1 | 3.6K | 2.7% | 5 |
| Dec 2025 | 90.5K | 82% | 1 | 2.9K | 2.6% | 5 |
| Jan 2026 | 90.5K | 80.1% | 1 | 3.6K | 3.2% | 5 |
| Feb 2026 | 90.5K | 81.9% | 1 | 3.6K | 3.3% | 5 |
| Mar 2026 | 135K | 85.2% | 1 | 4.4K | 2.8% | 5 |
| Apr 2026 | 110K | 83.8% | 1 | 3.6K | 2.7% | 5 |
| May 2026 | 110K | 84.6% | 1 | 3.6K | 2.8% | 5 |
| Jun 2026 | 110K | 85.9% | 1 | 2.9K | 2.3% | 5 |
| Jul 2026 | 90.5K | 83.3% | 1 | 2.9K | 2.7% | 5 |
| Aug 2026 | 90.5K | 84.7% | 1 | 2.9K | 2.7% | 5 |
| Sep 2026 | — | — | — | — | — | — |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Neo4j’s and TigerGraph’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Neo4j**: Measured on the search term “neo4j”.
- **TigerGraph**: Measured on the search term “tigergraph”.

- [Neo4j profile](/demand/global-en/brands/neo4j)
- [TigerGraph profile](/demand/global-en/brands/tigergraph)
- [All graph databases worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/graph-databases): The set both shares are measured inside, 5 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is branded search demand measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Which is more popular in search, Neo4j or TigerGraph?

In August 2026, Neo4j had more branded searches than TigerGraph among graph databases worldwide. Neo4j was estimated to have 90.5K branded searches compared to TigerGraph’s 2.9K, and held an 84.7% Share of Search versus TigerGraph’s 2.7%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Neo4j vs TigerGraph: Which is more popular by branded search?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/neo4j-vs-tigergraph

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/neo4j-vs-tigergraph. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.