--- title: "Nama vs Philips: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Nama or Philips more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Juicer brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/nama-juicers-vs-philips" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Nama vs Philips: Which is searched more? Is Nama or Philips more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Juicer brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Nama and Philips - **Competitive set**: Juicer brands - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Nama Share of Search**: 7.8% - **Philips Share of Search**: 6.4% ## Is Nama or Philips more popular in search? - In September 2026, Nama had more branded searches than Philips among juicer brands worldwide. Nama had about 27,100 branded searches, while Philips had 22,200. Nama made up 7.8% of all juicer brand searches we track, and Philips accounted for 6.4%. - Nama was ahead of Philips in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Nama’s share of searches among juicer brands worldwide moved from 10.1% to 7.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 33.1K to 27.1K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Philips’ share of searches among juicer brands worldwide moved from 6.8% to 6.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 22.2K. ## Top juicer brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Nama appeared in all five answers. Philips did not appear in any of the five answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Nama | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Ninja | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Breville | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | Omega | 4th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Kuvings | 5th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Hurom | 6th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Philips | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about juicer brands - Asked ChatGPT "Which juicer brand should I buy?": 1. Nama, 2. Omega, 3. Breville - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best juicer brands?": 1. Nama, 2. Omega, 3. Kuvings, 4. Hurom, 5. Breville, 6. Ninja - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best juicer brand for everyday juice making?": 1. Breville, 2. Nama, 3. Ninja, 4. Hurom - Searched Google, AI Overview "best juicer": 1. Nama, 2. Ninja, 3. Breville, 4. Kuvings - Searched Google, AI Overview "cold press juicer": 1. Ninja, 2. Nama Not named in any answer: Philips. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for juicer brands worldwide in September 2026? - In September 2026, Philips gained share of searches among juicer brands worldwide, from 5.8% to 6.4%. - In September 2026, Nama lost share of searches among juicer brands worldwide, from 8.7% to 7.8%. ## Month by month | Month | Nama estimated searches | Nama Share of Search | Nama rank | Philips estimated searches | Philips Share of Search | Philips rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 33.1K | 10.1% | 5 | 22.2K | 6.8% | 6 | | Nov 2025 | 49.5K | 9.4% | 5 | 18.1K | 3.4% | 6 | | Dec 2025 | 49.5K | 9.7% | 4 | 22.2K | 4.4% | 6 | | Jan 2026 | 40.5K | 9.6% | 5 | 22.2K | 5.3% | 6 | | Feb 2026 | 33.1K | 10% | 5 | 18.1K | 5.5% | 6 | | Mar 2026 | 33.1K | 10.1% | 5 | 18.1K | 5.5% | 6 | | Apr 2026 | 33.1K | 10.1% | 5 | 18.1K | 5.5% | 6 | | May 2026 | 33.1K | 9.8% | 5 | 18.1K | 5.4% | 6 | | Jun 2026 | 27.1K | 9% | 5 | 14.8K | 4.9% | 6 | | Jul 2026 | 27.1K | 8.9% | 4 | 14.8K | 4.9% | 6 | | Aug 2026 | 27.1K | 8.7% | 5 | 18.1K | 5.8% | 6 | | Sep 2026 | 27.1K | 7.8% | 5 | 22.2K | 6.4% | 6 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Nama’s and Philips’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Nama**: Measured on the search term “nama juicer”. - **Philips**: Measured on the search term “philips juicer”. - [Nama profile](/demand/global-en/brands/nama-juicers) - [Philips profile](/demand/global-en/brands/philips) - [All juicer brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/juicer-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Nama or Philips more popular in search? In September 2026, Nama had more branded searches than Philips among juicer brands worldwide. Nama had about 27,100 branded searches, while Philips had 22,200. Nama made up 7.8% of all juicer brand searches we track, and Philips accounted for 6.4%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Nama vs Philips: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/nama-juicers-vs-philips This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/nama-juicers-vs-philips. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.