---
title: "Mend vs OWASP Dependency-Track: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Mend or OWASP Dependency-Track more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Dependency scanning tools set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/mend-vs-owasp-dependency-track"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Mend vs OWASP Dependency-Track: Which is searched more?

Is Mend or OWASP Dependency-Track more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Dependency scanning tools set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Mend and OWASP Dependency-Track
- **Competitive set**: Dependency scanning tools
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Mend Share of Search**: 0.6%
- **OWASP Dependency-Track Share of Search**: 6.8%

## Is Mend or OWASP Dependency-Track more popular in search?

- In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track had more branded searches than Mend among dependency scanning tools worldwide. OWASP Dependency-Track had about 9,900 branded searches, while Mend had 880. OWASP Dependency-Track made up 6.8% of all dependency scanning tool searches we track, and Mend accounted for 0.6%.
- OWASP Dependency-Track was ahead of Mend in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Mend’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide moved from 0.72% to 0.6%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1K to 880.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track’s share of searches among dependency scanning tools worldwide moved from 5.8% to 6.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 8.1K to 9.9K.

## Top dependency scanning tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Mend was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. OWASP Dependency-Track was mentioned in one out of five: not in any of the three ChatGPT answers, but in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Mend was listed before OWASP Dependency-Track in two out of three answers that named either.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Trivy | 1st | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Dependabot | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Snyk | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| OWASP Dependency-Check | 4th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| Socket | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| Sonatype | 6th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| Renovate | 7th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| Mend | 8th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| Black Duck | 9th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| OWASP Dependency-Track | 10th | 0 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 1 of 5 |
| FOSSA | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 |

## Every AI answer about dependency scanning tools

- Asked ChatGPT "Which dependency scanning tool should I use?": 1. Dependabot, 2. Snyk, 3. Trivy, 4. Black Duck
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best dependency scanning tools?": 1. Snyk, 2. Dependabot, 3. Trivy, 4. Socket, 5. Mend, 6. Black Duck, 7. Sonatype, 8. Renovate, 9. OWASP Dependency-Check
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best dependency scanning tool for a software team?": 1. Snyk, 2. Dependabot, 3. Renovate, 4. Socket, 5. Mend
- Searched Google, AI Overview "dependency scanning tools": 1. Trivy, 2. OWASP Dependency-Check, 3. Sonatype, 4. Dependabot
- Searched Google, AI Overview "open source dependency scanner": 1. Trivy, 2. OWASP Dependency-Check, 3. OWASP Dependency-Track

Not named in any answer: FOSSA.

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 20, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for dependency scanning tools worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track overtook Sonatype to rank 4th among dependency scanning tools worldwide, with 6.8% of the searches.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for Mend worldwide fell 12% over 12 measured months, from 1K to 880 in September 2026.

## Month by month

| Month | Mend estimated searches | Mend Share of Search | Mend rank | OWASP Dependency-Track estimated searches | OWASP Dependency-Track Share of Search | OWASP Dependency-Track rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 1K | 0.72% | 10 | 8.1K | 5.8% | 5 |
| Nov 2025 | 1K | 0.81% | 10 | 8.1K | 6.6% | 5 |
| Dec 2025 | 1K | 0.8% | 10 | 8.1K | 6.5% | 4 |
| Jan 2026 | 1K | 0.79% | 10 | 8.1K | 6.4% | 5 |
| Feb 2026 | 1K | 0.73% | 10 | 8.1K | 5.9% | 5 |
| Mar 2026 | 1K | 0.43% | 10 | 9.9K | 4.3% | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | 1.3K | 0.77% | 10 | 9.9K | 5.8% | 4 |
| May 2026 | 1K | 0.64% | 10 | 9.9K | 6.4% | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | 880 | 0.58% | 10 | 9.9K | 6.5% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | 1K | 0.72% | 10 | 9.9K | 7.1% | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | 1K | 0.68% | 10 | 8.1K | 5.5% | 5 |
| Sep 2026 | 880 | 0.6% | 10 | 9.9K | 6.8% | 4 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Mend’s and OWASP Dependency-Track’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Mend**: Measured on the search term “mend io”.
- **OWASP Dependency-Track**: Measured on the search term “dependency track”.

- [Mend profile](/demand/global-en/brands/mend)
- [OWASP Dependency-Track profile](/demand/global-en/brands/owasp-dependency-track)
- [All dependency scanning tools worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/dependency-scanning-tools): The set both shares are measured inside, 11 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Mend or OWASP Dependency-Track more popular in search?

In September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track had more branded searches than Mend among dependency scanning tools worldwide. OWASP Dependency-Track had about 9,900 branded searches, while Mend had 880. OWASP Dependency-Track made up 6.8% of all dependency scanning tool searches we track, and Mend accounted for 0.6%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Mend vs OWASP Dependency-Track: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/mend-vs-owasp-dependency-track

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/mend-vs-owasp-dependency-track. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
