--- title: "M*Modal vs TranscribeMe: Which is searched more?" description: "Is M*Modal or TranscribeMe more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Medical transcription services set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/m-modal-vs-transcribeme" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # M*Modal vs TranscribeMe: Which is searched more? Is M*Modal or TranscribeMe more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Medical transcription services set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: M*Modal and TranscribeMe - **Competitive set**: Medical transcription services - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **M*Modal Share of Search**: 0.42% - **TranscribeMe Share of Search**: 45.1% ## Is M*Modal or TranscribeMe more popular in search? - In September 2026, TranscribeMe had more branded searches than M*Modal among medical transcription services worldwide. TranscribeMe had about 135,000 branded searches, while M*Modal had 1,260. TranscribeMe made up 45.1% of all medical transcription service searches we track, and M*Modal accounted for 0.42%. - TranscribeMe was ahead of M*Modal in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, M*Modal’s share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide moved from 0.59% to 0.42%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 1.6K to 1.3K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, TranscribeMe’s share of searches among medical transcription services worldwide moved from 41.9% to 45.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 110K to 135K. ## Top medical transcription services in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, TranscribeMe was mentioned in two out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. M*Modal did not appear in any of the four answers. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Nabla | 1st | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | TranscribeMe | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | Freed | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | Dragon Medical One | 4th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 | | TranscribeMD | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | Amphion | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | iMedX | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | M*Modal | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | | Nuance | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 | ## Every AI answer about medical transcription services - Asked ChatGPT "Which medical transcription service should I use?": 1. Nabla, 2. TranscribeMe, 3. Dragon Medical One - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best medical transcription services?": 1. TranscribeMe, 2. Freed, 3. Dragon Medical One - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best medical transcription service for clinical notes?": 1. Nabla, 2. Freed - Searched Google, AI Overview "medical transcription services": named none of the brands we track Not named in any answer: TranscribeMD, Amphion, iMedX, M*Modal and Nuance. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for medical transcription services worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for TranscribeMe worldwide rose 22.7% over 12 measured months, from 110K to 135K in September 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for M*Modal worldwide fell 19.2% over 12 measured months, from 1.6K to 1.3K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | M*Modal estimated searches | M*Modal Share of Search | M*Modal rank | TranscribeMe estimated searches | TranscribeMe Share of Search | TranscribeMe rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 1.6K | 0.59% | 8 | 110K | 41.9% | 2 | | Nov 2025 | 1.3K | 0.49% | 8 | 110K | 42.6% | 2 | | Dec 2025 | 1.3K | 0.58% | 8 | 90.5K | 41.6% | 2 | | Jan 2026 | 1.7K | 0.54% | 8 | 135K | 43.1% | 2 | | Feb 2026 | 1.6K | 0.64% | 7 | 110K | 43.2% | 2 | | Mar 2026 | 1.3K | 0.42% | 9 | 135K | 43.2% | 2 | | Apr 2026 | 1.3K | 0.34% | 8 | 165K | 44.7% | 2 | | May 2026 | 1.3K | 0.41% | 8 | 135K | 42.3% | 2 | | Jun 2026 | 1.2K | 0.4% | 8 | 135K | 44.9% | 2 | | Jul 2026 | 1.1K | 0.32% | 8 | 165K | 45.9% | 2 | | Aug 2026 | 1.3K | 0.45% | 8 | 135K | 45.5% | 2 | | Sep 2026 | 1.3K | 0.42% | 8 | 135K | 45.1% | 2 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using M*Modal’s and TranscribeMe’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **M*Modal**: Measured on the search terms “m modal” and “mmodal”, summed into one figure. - **TranscribeMe**: Measured on the search term “transcribeme”. - [M*Modal profile](/demand/global-en/brands/m-modal) - [TranscribeMe profile](/demand/global-en/brands/transcribeme) - [All medical transcription services worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/medical-transcription-services): The set both shares are measured inside, 9 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is M*Modal or TranscribeMe more popular in search? In September 2026, TranscribeMe had more branded searches than M*Modal among medical transcription services worldwide. TranscribeMe had about 135,000 branded searches, while M*Modal had 1,260. TranscribeMe made up 45.1% of all medical transcription service searches we track, and M*Modal accounted for 0.42%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "M*Modal vs TranscribeMe: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/m-modal-vs-transcribeme This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/m-modal-vs-transcribeme. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.