---
title: "Hunter vs Xtratuf: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Hunter or Xtratuf more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Gumboot brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/hunter-vs-xtratuf"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Hunter vs Xtratuf: Which is searched more?

Is Hunter or Xtratuf more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Gumboot brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Hunter and Xtratuf
- **Competitive set**: Gumboot brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Hunter Share of Search**: 18.1%
- **Xtratuf Share of Search**: 14.8%

## Is Hunter or Xtratuf more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Hunter had more branded searches than Xtratuf among gumboot brands worldwide. Hunter had about 60,500 branded searches, while Xtratuf had 49,500. Hunter made up 18.1% of all gumboot brand searches we track, and Xtratuf accounted for 14.8%.
- The lead changed hands once in the 12 months ending September 2026: Hunter took it in February 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Hunter’s share of searches among gumboot brands worldwide moved from 15.5% to 18.1%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 60.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Xtratuf’s share of searches among gumboot brands worldwide moved from 15.5% to 14.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 60.5K to 49.5K.

## Top gumboot brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Hunter was mentioned in three out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers and in one of the two Google AI Overviews. Xtratuf was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Hunter was listed before Xtratuf in every answer that named either.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Muck Boot | 1st | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Hunter | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| Bogs | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 |
| Dunlop | 4th | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 |
| Xtratuf | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 |
| Boonies | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 |

## Every AI answer about gumboot brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which gumboot brand should I buy?": 1. Hunter, 2. Bogs, 3. Xtratuf, 4. Dunlop
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best gumboot brands?": 1. Hunter, 2. Muck Boot, 3. Bogs, 4. Dunlop, 5. Xtratuf
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best gumboot brand for wet muddy work?": 1. Muck Boot, 2. Dunlop, 3. Bogs
- Searched Google, AI Overview "best gumboots": 1. Muck Boot, 2. Hunter, 3. Bogs
- Searched Google, AI Overview "rubber boots for mud": 1. Muck Boot

Not named in any answer: Boonies.

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for gumboot brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Xtratuf overtook Boonies to rank 3rd among gumboot brands worldwide, with 14.8% of the searches.
- In September 2026, Hunter lost share of searches among gumboot brands worldwide, from 22.7% to 18.1%.

## Month by month

| Month | Hunter estimated searches | Hunter Share of Search | Hunter rank | Xtratuf estimated searches | Xtratuf Share of Search | Xtratuf rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 60.5K | 15.5% | 2 | 60.5K | 15.5% | 3 |
| Nov 2025 | 49.5K | 8.5% | 4 | 110K | 18.9% | 2 |
| Dec 2025 | 49.5K | 7.9% | 5 | 135K | 21.6% | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | 60.5K | 13.9% | 2 | 60.5K | 13.9% | 3 |
| Feb 2026 | 60.5K | 18.2% | 2 | 49.5K | 14.9% | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | 74K | 23.4% | 2 | 49.5K | 15.6% | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | 74K | 25.1% | 2 | 49.5K | 16.8% | 4 |
| May 2026 | 60.5K | 20.9% | 2 | 60.5K | 20.9% | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | 60.5K | 24.4% | 2 | 40.5K | 16.3% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | 60.5K | 26.3% | 1 | 40.5K | 17.6% | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | 60.5K | 22.7% | 2 | 33.1K | 12.4% | 4 |
| Sep 2026 | 60.5K | 18.1% | 2 | 49.5K | 14.8% | 3 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Hunter’s and Xtratuf’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Hunter**: Measured on the search term “hunter io”.
- **Xtratuf**: Measured on the search term “xtratuf”.

- [Hunter profile](/demand/global-en/brands/hunter)
- [Xtratuf profile](/demand/global-en/brands/xtratuf)
- [All gumboot brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/gumboot-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 6 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Hunter or Xtratuf more popular in search?

In September 2026, Hunter had more branded searches than Xtratuf among gumboot brands worldwide. Hunter had about 60,500 branded searches, while Xtratuf had 49,500. Hunter made up 18.1% of all gumboot brand searches we track, and Xtratuf accounted for 14.8%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Hunter vs Xtratuf: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/hunter-vs-xtratuf

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/hunter-vs-xtratuf. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
