--- title: "Google Rich Results Test vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Google Rich Results Test or Screaming Frog SEO Spider more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Schema markup tools set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/google-rich-results-test-vs-screaming-frog-seo-spider" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Google Rich Results Test vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider: Which is searched more? Is Google Rich Results Test or Screaming Frog SEO Spider more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Schema markup tools set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Google Rich Results Test and Screaming Frog SEO Spider - **Competitive set**: Schema markup tools - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Google Rich Results Test Share of Search**: 45.4% - **Screaming Frog SEO Spider Share of Search**: 24.8% ## Is Google Rich Results Test or Screaming Frog SEO Spider more popular in search? - In September 2026, Google Rich Results Test had more branded searches than Screaming Frog SEO Spider among schema markup tools worldwide. Google Rich Results Test had about 33,100 branded searches, while Screaming Frog SEO Spider had 18,100. Google Rich Results Test made up 45.4% of all schema markup tool searches we track, and Screaming Frog SEO Spider accounted for 24.8%. - Google Rich Results Test was ahead of Screaming Frog SEO Spider in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Google Rich Results Test’s share of searches among schema markup tools worldwide moved from 30.5% to 45.4%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 22.2K to 33.1K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Screaming Frog SEO Spider’s share of searches among schema markup tools worldwide moved from 24.9% to 24.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 18.1K. ## Top schema markup tools in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Google Rich Results Test was mentioned in three out of five: in all three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Screaming Frog SEO Spider was mentioned in two out of five: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in either of the two Google AI Overviews. Google Rich Results Test was listed before Screaming Frog SEO Spider in every answer that named either. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Rank Math | 1st | 3 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 4 of 5 | | TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Google Rich Results Test | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Schema App | 4th | 1 of 3 | 1 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Screaming Frog SEO Spider | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Schema Pro | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | WordLift | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | InLinks | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | | WPSSO | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 0 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about schema markup tools - Asked ChatGPT "Which schema markup tool should I use?": 1. TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator, 2. Google Rich Results Test, 3. Rank Math, 4. Screaming Frog SEO Spider - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best schema markup tools?": 1. Google Rich Results Test, 2. Rank Math, 3. Screaming Frog SEO Spider - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best schema markup tool for a website?": 1. TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator, 2. Rank Math, 3. Schema App, 4. Google Rich Results Test - Searched Google, AI Overview "schema markup tool": 1. Schema App, 2. Rank Math, 3. TechnicalSEO.com Schema Markup Generator - Searched Google, AI Overview "schema markup generator": named none of the brands we track Not named in any answer: Schema Pro, WordLift, InLinks and WPSSO. Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for schema markup tools worldwide in September 2026? - Estimated monthly branded searches for Google Rich Results Test worldwide rose 49.1% over 12 measured months, from 22.2K to 33.1K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Google Rich Results Test estimated searches | Google Rich Results Test Share of Search | Google Rich Results Test rank | Screaming Frog SEO Spider estimated searches | Screaming Frog SEO Spider Share of Search | Screaming Frog SEO Spider rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 22.2K | 30.5% | 2 | 18.1K | 24.9% | 3 | | Nov 2025 | 22.2K | 30.7% | 2 | 18.1K | 25% | 3 | | Dec 2025 | 22.2K | 32.5% | 2 | 14.8K | 21.6% | 3 | | Jan 2026 | 27.1K | 35.2% | 1 | 18.1K | 23.5% | 3 | | Feb 2026 | 27.1K | 33.4% | 1 | 22.2K | 27.4% | 3 | | Mar 2026 | 33.1K | 35.9% | 1 | 27.1K | 29.4% | 3 | | Apr 2026 | 33.1K | 36% | 1 | 27.1K | 29.5% | 3 | | May 2026 | 33.1K | 40.1% | 1 | 22.2K | 26.9% | 3 | | Jun 2026 | 40.5K | 43.2% | 1 | 22.2K | 23.7% | 3 | | Jul 2026 | 40.5K | 40.3% | 1 | 22.2K | 22.1% | 3 | | Aug 2026 | 33.1K | 45.5% | 1 | 18.1K | 24.9% | 3 | | Sep 2026 | 33.1K | 45.4% | 1 | 18.1K | 24.8% | 3 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Google Rich Results Test’s and Screaming Frog SEO Spider’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Google Rich Results Test**: Measured on the search term “google rich results test”. - **Screaming Frog SEO Spider**: Measured on the search term “screaming frog seo spider”. - [Google Rich Results Test profile](/demand/global-en/brands/google-rich-results-test) - [Screaming Frog SEO Spider profile](/demand/global-en/brands/screaming-frog-seo-spider) - [All schema markup tools worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/schema-markup-tools): The set both shares are measured inside, 9 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Google Rich Results Test or Screaming Frog SEO Spider more popular in search? In September 2026, Google Rich Results Test had more branded searches than Screaming Frog SEO Spider among schema markup tools worldwide. Google Rich Results Test had about 33,100 branded searches, while Screaming Frog SEO Spider had 18,100. Google Rich Results Test made up 45.4% of all schema markup tool searches we track, and Screaming Frog SEO Spider accounted for 24.8%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Google Rich Results Test vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/google-rich-results-test-vs-screaming-frog-seo-spider This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/google-rich-results-test-vs-screaming-frog-seo-spider. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.