---
title: "Gilmour vs Hozelock: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Gilmour or Hozelock more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Hose connector brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/gilmour-vs-hozelock"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Gilmour vs Hozelock: Which is searched more?

Is Gilmour or Hozelock more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Hose connector brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Gilmour and Hozelock
- **Competitive set**: Hose connector brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Gilmour Share of Search**: 0.07%
- **Hozelock Share of Search**: 1.8%

## Is Gilmour or Hozelock more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Hozelock had more branded searches than Gilmour among hose connector brands worldwide. Hozelock had about 18,100 branded searches, while Gilmour had 720. Hozelock made up 1.8% of all hose connector brand searches we track, and Gilmour accounted for 0.07%.
- Hozelock was ahead of Gilmour in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Gilmour’s share of searches among hose connector brands worldwide moved from 0.06% to 0.07%, and its estimated monthly branded searches held steady at 720.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Hozelock’s share of searches among hose connector brands worldwide moved from 1.3% to 1.8%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 14.8K to 18.1K.

## Top hose connector brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and one Google AI Overview, Gilmour was mentioned in two out of four: in two of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Hozelock was mentioned in one out of four: in one of the three ChatGPT answers, but not in the Google AI Overview. Gilmour was listed before Hozelock in every answer.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gilmour | 1st | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 |
| Gardena | 2nd | 2 of 3 | 1 of 1 | 3 of 4 |
| Dramm | 3rd | 2 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 2 of 4 |
| Hozelock | 4th | 1 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 1 of 4 |
| Karcher | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |
| Neta | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |
| Claber | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |
| Draper | Not ranked | 0 of 3 | 0 of 1 | 0 of 4 |

## Every AI answer about hose connector brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which hose connector brand should I buy?": named none of the brands we track
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best hose connector brands?": 1. Gilmour, 2. Dramm, 3. Gardena
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best hose connector brand for easy watering?": 1. Gardena, 2. Gilmour, 3. Dramm, 4. Hozelock
- Searched Google, AI Overview "hose fittings": 1. Gardena

Not named in any answer: Karcher, Neta, Claber and Draper.

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 21, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for hose connector brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Hozelock lost share of searches among hose connector brands worldwide, from 2.7% to 1.8%.

## Month by month

| Month | Gilmour estimated searches | Gilmour Share of Search | Gilmour rank | Hozelock estimated searches | Hozelock Share of Search | Hozelock rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 720 | 0.06% | 7 | 14.8K | 1.3% | 4 |
| Nov 2025 | 480 | 0.04% | 7 | 12.1K | 0.92% | 4 |
| Dec 2025 | 320 | 0.03% | 7 | 12.1K | 1.1% | 4 |
| Jan 2026 | 320 | 0.03% | 7 | 14.8K | 1.3% | 4 |
| Feb 2026 | 480 | 0.04% | 7 | 14.8K | 1.3% | 4 |
| Mar 2026 | 1K | 0.06% | 7 | 33.1K | 1.9% | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | 1.3K | 0.07% | 7 | 49.5K | 2.8% | 4 |
| May 2026 | 1.6K | 0.1% | 7 | 60.5K | 3.7% | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | 1.3K | 0.1% | 7 | 49.5K | 3.6% | 4 |
| Jul 2026 | 1.6K | 0.12% | 7 | 60.5K | 4.6% | 4 |
| Aug 2026 | 1K | 0.08% | 7 | 33.1K | 2.7% | 4 |
| Sep 2026 | 720 | 0.07% | 7 | 18.1K | 1.8% | 4 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Gilmour’s and Hozelock’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Gilmour**: Measured on the search term “gilmour hose”.
- **Hozelock**: Measured on the search term “hozelock”.

- [Gilmour profile](/demand/global-en/brands/gilmour)
- [Hozelock profile](/demand/global-en/brands/hozelock)
- [All hose connector brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/hose-connector-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 8 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Gilmour or Hozelock more popular in search?

In September 2026, Hozelock had more branded searches than Gilmour among hose connector brands worldwide. Hozelock had about 18,100 branded searches, while Gilmour had 720. Hozelock made up 1.8% of all hose connector brand searches we track, and Gilmour accounted for 0.07%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Gilmour vs Hozelock: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/gilmour-vs-hozelock

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/gilmour-vs-hozelock. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
