--- title: "Cursor vs Neovim: Which is searched more?" description: "Is Cursor or Neovim more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Code editors set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time." canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/cursor-vs-neovim" publisher: "Brandwave" --- # Cursor vs Neovim: Which is searched more? Is Cursor or Neovim more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Code editors set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time. ## Key facts - **Compared**: Cursor and Neovim - **Competitive set**: Code editors - **Market**: Global - **Month measured**: Sep 2026 - **Cursor Share of Search**: 2.7% - **Neovim Share of Search**: 1.7% ## Is Cursor or Neovim more popular in search? - In September 2026, Cursor had more branded searches than Neovim among code editors worldwide. Cursor had about 142,000 branded searches, while Neovim had 90,500. Cursor made up 2.7% of all code editor searches we track, and Neovim accounted for 1.7%. - Cursor was ahead of Neovim in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Cursor’s share of searches among code editors worldwide moved from 2.9% to 2.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 165K to 142K. - Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Neovim’s share of searches among code editors worldwide moved from 2.4% to 1.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 135K to 90.5K. ## Top code editors in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, Cursor appeared in all five answers. Neovim was mentioned in three out of five: in one of the three ChatGPT answers and in both Google AI Overviews. Cursor was listed before Neovim in every answer. Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options. | Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Visual Studio Code | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Cursor | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Zed | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 | | Sublime Text | 4th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | JetBrains | 5th | 2 of 3 | 0 of 2 | 2 of 5 | | Neovim | 6th | 1 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 3 of 5 | | Notepad++ | 7th | 0 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 2 of 5 | ## Every AI answer about code editors - Asked ChatGPT "Which code editor should I use?": 1. Visual Studio Code, 2. Cursor, 3. Zed - Asked ChatGPT "What are the best code editors?": 1. Visual Studio Code, 2. Cursor, 3. Zed, 4. JetBrains, 5. Sublime Text, 6. Neovim - Asked ChatGPT "What's the best code editor for daily programming work?": 1. Visual Studio Code, 2. Cursor, 3. JetBrains, 4. Zed - Searched Google, AI Overview "code editor": 1. Visual Studio Code, 2. Cursor, 3. Zed, 4. Sublime Text, 5. Neovim, 6. Notepad++ - Searched Google, AI Overview "programming editor": 1. Visual Studio Code, 2. Cursor, 3. Zed, 4. Sublime Text, 5. Notepad++, 6. Neovim Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 20, 2026. ## How did search popularity change for code editors worldwide in September 2026? - Cursor’s share of searches among code editors worldwide has lost ground for 3 months in a row, from 3.5% to 2.7% in September 2026. - Estimated monthly branded searches for Neovim worldwide fell 33% over 12 measured months, from 135K to 90.5K in September 2026. ## Month by month | Month | Cursor estimated searches | Cursor Share of Search | Cursor rank | Neovim estimated searches | Neovim Share of Search | Neovim rank | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Oct 2025 | 165K | 2.9% | 5 | 135K | 2.4% | 6 | | Nov 2025 | 161K | 3% | 5 | 110K | 2% | 6 | | Dec 2025 | 145K | 3% | 5 | 110K | 2.3% | 6 | | Jan 2026 | 179K | 3.2% | 5 | 135K | 2.4% | 6 | | Feb 2026 | 186K | 3.2% | 5 | 110K | 1.9% | 6 | | Mar 2026 | 213K | 3.7% | 5 | 135K | 2.4% | 6 | | Apr 2026 | 192K | 3.5% | 5 | 110K | 2% | 6 | | May 2026 | 190K | 3.5% | 5 | 110K | 2% | 6 | | Jun 2026 | 188K | 3.5% | 4 | 90.5K | 1.7% | 6 | | Jul 2026 | 168K | 3.3% | 4 | 90.5K | 1.8% | 6 | | Aug 2026 | 158K | 3.1% | 5 | 90.5K | 1.8% | 6 | | Sep 2026 | 142K | 2.7% | 5 | 90.5K | 1.7% | 6 | ## How each brand is measured Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Cursor’s and Neovim’s names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading. - **Cursor**: Measured on the search terms “anysphere cursor”, “cursor ai editor”, “cursor app”, “cursor bugbot”, “cursor cli”, “cursor code”, “cursor code editor”, “cursor composer”, “cursor editor”, “cursor ide”, “cursor pro”, “cursor sh”, “cursor vscode” and “cursor.sh”, summed into one figure. - **Neovim**: Measured on the search term “neovim”. - [Cursor profile](/demand/global-en/brands/cursor) - [Neovim profile](/demand/global-en/brands/neovim) - [All code editors worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/code-editors): The set both shares are measured inside, 7 brands. ## Methodology - [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused. ## Frequently asked questions ### Is Cursor or Neovim more popular in search? In September 2026, Cursor had more branded searches than Neovim among code editors worldwide. Cursor had about 142,000 branded searches, while Neovim had 90,500. Cursor made up 2.7% of all code editor searches we track, and Neovim accounted for 1.7%. ## Cite this page Brandwave. "Cursor vs Neovim: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/cursor-vs-neovim This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/cursor-vs-neovim. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.