---
title: "Connetix vs PicassoTiles: Which is searched more?"
description: "Is Connetix or PicassoTiles more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Magnetic tile brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time."
canonical: "https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/connetix-vs-picassotiles"
publisher: "Brandwave"
---

# Connetix vs PicassoTiles: Which is searched more?

Is Connetix or PicassoTiles more popular in search? Compare estimated monthly branded-search demand and Share of Search inside the Magnetic tile brands set worldwide. Branded searches tell you how often people look for a brand by name or related terms. Comparing these searches across competitors helps you see how popular each brand is over time.

## Key facts

- **Compared**: Connetix and PicassoTiles
- **Competitive set**: Magnetic tile brands
- **Market**: Global
- **Month measured**: Sep 2026
- **Connetix Share of Search**: 26.7%
- **PicassoTiles Share of Search**: 0.56%

## Is Connetix or PicassoTiles more popular in search?

- In September 2026, Connetix had more branded searches than PicassoTiles among magnetic tile brands worldwide. Connetix had about 90,500 branded searches, while PicassoTiles had 1,900. Connetix made up 26.7% of all magnetic tile brand searches we track, and PicassoTiles accounted for 0.56%.
- Connetix was ahead of PicassoTiles in every measured month of the 12 months ending September 2026.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, Connetix’s share of searches among magnetic tile brands worldwide moved from 30.8% to 26.7%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 135K to 90.5K.
- Across the 12 months ending September 2026, PicassoTiles’ share of searches among magnetic tile brands worldwide moved from 0.55% to 0.56%, and its estimated monthly branded searches moved from 2.4K to 1.9K.

## Top magnetic tile brands in ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews

In three ChatGPT questions and two Google AI Overviews, both Connetix and PicassoTiles showed up in all five answers. Connetix was listed before PicassoTiles in four of them.

Brands get a higher AI rank if they are mentioned earlier in the answers that list options.

| Brand | AI rank | ChatGPT answers that named it | Google AI Overviews that named it | All answers that named it |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MAGNA-TILES | 1st | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| Connetix | 2nd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |
| PicassoTiles | 3rd | 3 of 3 | 2 of 2 | 5 of 5 |

## Every AI answer about magnetic tile brands

- Asked ChatGPT "Which magnetic tiles should I buy for my kids?": 1. MAGNA-TILES, 2. Connetix, 3. PicassoTiles
- Asked ChatGPT "What are the best magnetic tile brands?": 1. MAGNA-TILES, 2. Connetix, 3. PicassoTiles
- Asked ChatGPT "What's the best magnetic tile set for a toddler?": 1. MAGNA-TILES, 2. Connetix, 3. PicassoTiles
- Searched Google, AI Overview "magnetic tiles": 1. MAGNA-TILES, 2. PicassoTiles, 3. Connetix
- Searched Google, AI Overview "best magnetic tiles": 1. Connetix, 2. MAGNA-TILES, 3. PicassoTiles

Brands are listed in the order each answer named them. The answers were collected in the United States on October 22, 2026.

## How did search popularity change for magnetic tile brands worldwide in September 2026?

- In September 2026, Connetix gained share of searches among magnetic tile brands worldwide, from 19.6% to 26.7%.
- Estimated monthly branded searches for PicassoTiles worldwide fell 20.8% over 12 measured months, from 2.4K to 1.9K in September 2026.

## Month by month

| Month | Connetix estimated searches | Connetix Share of Search | Connetix rank | PicassoTiles estimated searches | PicassoTiles Share of Search | PicassoTiles rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Oct 2025 | 135K | 30.8% | 2 | 2.4K | 0.55% | 3 |
| Nov 2025 | 201K | 26.6% | 2 | 4.4K | 0.58% | 3 |
| Dec 2025 | 165K | 22.9% | 2 | 5.4K | 0.75% | 3 |
| Jan 2026 | 74K | 23% | 2 | 2.4K | 0.74% | 3 |
| Feb 2026 | 60.5K | 19.6% | 2 | 1.9K | 0.62% | 3 |
| Mar 2026 | 60.5K | 19.6% | 2 | 1.9K | 0.62% | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | 40.5K | 16.7% | 2 | 1.6K | 0.66% | 3 |
| May 2026 | 49.5K | 22.9% | 2 | 1.6K | 0.74% | 3 |
| Jun 2026 | 49.5K | 22.9% | 2 | 1.6K | 0.74% | 3 |
| Jul 2026 | 60.5K | 23% | 2 | 1.9K | 0.72% | 3 |
| Aug 2026 | 60.5K | 19.6% | 2 | 1.9K | 0.62% | 3 |
| Sep 2026 | 90.5K | 26.7% | 2 | 1.9K | 0.56% | 3 |

## How each brand is measured

Brandwave collects information about searches that people make online using Connetix’s and PicassoTiles’ names. When viewed over time, estimated search volumes for these branded terms can be used to understand whether interest in the brands is growing, holding steady, or fading.

- **Connetix**: Measured on the search term “connetix”.
- **PicassoTiles**: Measured on the search term “picassotiles”.

- [Connetix profile](/demand/global-en/brands/connetix)
- [PicassoTiles profile](/demand/global-en/brands/picassotiles)
- [All magnetic tile brands worldwide](/demand/global-en/categories/magnetic-tile-brands): The set both shares are measured inside, 3 brands.

## Methodology

- [How is the Brand Demand Index measured?](/demand/methodology): Where the figures come from, what they compare, and how they may be reused.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Connetix or PicassoTiles more popular in search?

In September 2026, Connetix had more branded searches than PicassoTiles among magnetic tile brands worldwide. Connetix had about 90,500 branded searches, while PicassoTiles had 1,900. Connetix made up 26.7% of all magnetic tile brand searches we track, and PicassoTiles accounted for 0.56%.

## Cite this page

Brandwave. "Connetix vs PicassoTiles: Which is searched more?". https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/connetix-vs-picassotiles

This page is also available as HTML at https://gobrandwave.com/demand/global-en/compare/connetix-vs-picassotiles. Brandwave publishes an index of its Markdown pages at https://gobrandwave.com/llms.txt.
